In Reply to: Re: Your all-capped proposition posted by Phil Tower on November 12, 2002 at 15:50:45:
The context of your original DBT post at the top of this thread was about wires. Now, you tell me that you recognize -- and pay for -- the difference between wires. Why, then, the interest in DBTs for wires, since all that a DBT will ever establish is the existence of a difference -- something that you already acknowledge exists?I could personally understand someone's interest (because I share it) in the use of DBTs to verify the efficacy of some other tweaks, such as isolation platforms for solid-state electronics, "resonance control devices," demagnetizers for aluminum CDs, etc.
But I have to say, that it appears to me that you're admitting that you launched a thread asking a question that you already know the answer to: Why do people resist using DBTs to establish that differences between wires exist?
The answer is that people resist that for the same reason they would resist conducting a DBT to prove that the sun rises in the East in the morning: it would merely establish the truth of a widely held proposition.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: You've lost me here, Phil - Bruce from DC 07:43:44 11/13/02 (1)
- Re: You've lost me here, Phil - Phil Tower 08:06:22 11/13/02 (0)