In Reply to: RE: "HP's tiny Xeon-powered PC puts the Mac Mini to shame." posted by MikeCh on November 16, 2016 at 12:01:08:
It looks like a nice little unit and great value, though the Darth Vader inspired aesthetic seems a bit dated.
Can you substantiate the "300% faster" claim?
. . . in theory, practice and theory are the same; in practice, they are different . . .
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- 300% faster ??? - tlea 18:31:28 11/19/16 (10)
- RE: 300% faster ??? - MikeCh 22:51:24 11/20/16 (9)
- Likewise - tlea 03:50:15 11/21/16 (8)
- He's confused or deliberately spreading misinformation: - AbeCollins 17:33:12 11/21/16 (1)
- RE: He's confused or deliberately spreading misinformation: - Old Listener 23:28:02 11/21/16 (0)
- (Re)read the headline. - MikeCh 07:12:29 11/21/16 (5)
- Re-read you own post - tlea 06:21:45 11/22/16 (4)
- Should have read Mac Mini with fastest available CPU (Intel Core i7-3540M @3GHz). - MikeCh 16:47:06 11/22/16 (3)
- Yes, it should have. N/T - tlea 19:38:34 11/22/16 (2)
- RE: Yes, it should have. N/T - MikeCh 11:02:39 11/25/16 (0)
- Nothing like derailing ones own thread and cred ;-) - AbeCollins 07:13:17 11/23/16 (0)