Home OTL Asylum

OTL, Output Transformerless Amplifier User Group.

RE: Addendum

Thanks for your great insights Tyu.

Like you, I do not speak about things that I have not heard or tried. Theories often can get unstuck when it comes to reality.

ML set-up:

Having two transformers that are the same would require filters (resistor, cap or inductors) in the signal path to get the frequency response right. More filters less sound.

SL set-up:

Now we have come up with a solution that can do away with all the filters on the primary side of the transformer - which is a big plus. The only filter now is in the form of a small value cap (0.015pF) in series with the two legs of the high frequency transformer.

Lew has already used a 0.01uF teflon cap here instead of a 0.015uF cap without any problems. I will be using 0.0075uF teflon.

Comparing the above two filtering set-up, isn't the SL one less obtrusive now?

Big value cap and resistor is more damaging than small value cap and resistor - all things being equal.

Also I suspect that at 8kV the cap on the secondary is also going to be less obtrusive.

Like you already said, the ML set-up have to give away the low bass which the SL can do easily with its multi-tap monstrous bass transformer.

Will



This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Schiit Audio  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups
  • RE: Addendum - KIS 18:32:51 04/28/12 (0)

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.