In Reply to: Still not clear on how you define pictures... posted by DeKay on July 24, 2016 at 21:23:01:
The proposition: it's the image per se that hurts the sound, not the vibration of the image or the vibration of the glass/frame that holds the image. Now do you see where I'm going with this?
Edits: 07/25/16 07/25/16
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- A picture is an image. - geoffkait 04:22:49 07/25/16 (12)
- Photos & paintings both = image. However, I can see the presence... - DeKay 10:11:38 07/25/16 (11)
- Things are worse than you suspect. Much worse. - geoffkait 10:35:46 07/25/16 (10)
- Scary - 4everyoung 15:20:34 07/25/16 (9)
- RE: Scary - Tweaker456 18:14:49 07/25/16 (5)
- RE: Scary - geoffkait 03:45:51 07/26/16 (4)
- RE: Scary - Tweaker456 13:03:40 07/26/16 (3)
- I have some bad news. - geoffkait 14:16:58 07/26/16 (2)
- RE: I have some bad news. - Tweaker456 13:35:27 07/27/16 (0)
- RE: I have some bad news. - Tweaker456 12:41:37 07/27/16 (0)
- Interesting... - geoffkait 15:27:31 07/25/16 (2)
- RE: Interesting... - 4everyoung 06:14:04 07/26/16 (1)
- RE: Interesting... - geoffkait 08:53:11 07/26/16 (0)