Home Isolation Ward

From ebony pucks to magic foil, mystical and controversial tweaks.

It's all in your mind

"I did read the article and I did read the original post on the Belt website.

"Where there is discrepancy is by your very own writing where you state that the seal is necessary of the NASA freezer. That, in light that the seal is not even mentioned in your PWB letter, obviously points to major discrepancies in your own accounts. Now to promote a NASA experiment(!) and not to mention such factors would be criminal for a bona fide scientist, but yet you make changes to conditions for experimentation."

What are you going on about? I already told you - it's only a mind experiment. There is no discrepancy.

"In earlier postings you claim a friend's cell phone miraculous cleared up in terms of reception when you placed his photo in a freezer and that from a noticeable distance. That has not been proved by a wide range of participants has it? It should be very easy to verify as many phones have indicators for signal strength and there are millions of users."

You're confused - in earlier postings, the customer's phone cleared up because of the Teleportation Tweak, not the photos in the freezer tweak. Geez, try to keep up with the conversation. The photos in the freezer tweak in the article involved picture quality, not sound quality. Hell-ooo!

"You claim increases in sound quality but you do not define the nature of the increase in sound quality to be expected.

Well, actually, video quality was the issue in the case we're talking about, not sound quality. And, actually, I did discuss the video quality in the article. You probably weren't paying very close attention. LOL

"An increases in quality may be simply due to increased attention. As I state a ludicrously simple experiment would be to have you send your photos to a third party who will simply place your photos in and out his freezer over a month and then you keep a log of when you hear an increase in "sound quality" in your system. Comparing your log with the third party should show overlaps in the tested time frames."

I have already discussed a simple experiment - the one that I described in the article. As I just pointed out, the experiment involved video picture quality, not sound quality. Hell-ooo!

"As for your explanations: read Dawkin's Unweaving the Rainbow, and Sagan's The Demon Haunted World. You make up explanations for which there are no proofs; you drop names, as you accuse me of doing, but there is absolutely no substance to your claims at all. (C'mon, Einstein!: yeah his theory involves the inconstancy of time but to make major changes would involve such large masses that the nearby presence of a black hole would be of far greater consequence than the effects of time, at least given our current technology)."

I was not attempting to prove anything. Try to pay better attention.

"Now on this forum and others, you have proclaimed yourself to be a "THEORETICAL PHYSICIST". Let's see some real theory. Lets see some real third party uninvolved observer proof in a controlled environment."

I actually do not promote myslef as you are suggetsing. I just happen to be a theorerical physicist. Just like you happen to be a steelworker but, unfortunately, one with some sort of comprehension disorder.

PS - If you are on some of heavy medication, please let me know and I'll try to take it easy on you. But if you are, it would certainly explain your pattern of angst and confusion.



Edits: 08/18/11 08/18/11

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Western Glow Tube Service  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.