In Reply to: He who laughs last laughs best posted by geoffkait on May 12, 2011 at 17:00:09:
The boy is getting jealous that being a theoretical physicist and a rocket scientist doesn't necessarily provide answers.
When you don't want to do the research and exploration on your own and expect to be spoon fed answers, well, then, in my book you are no scientist.
As far as being a theoretical physicist, the names you claim I dropped have a lot to do with the issues of randomness and probability. If you are unfamiliar with even the slightest ideas they have written about, then you are no theoretical physicist. Or, if you are you are basing your theories on events well before the last century and have yet to catch up with modern theories and ideas.
You claimed that I had an inferiority complex. LOL! Most of us can certainly see that in your actions. Even Sheldrake would have had an explanation and you are supposed to be the "expert" on his ideas!
LOL!
It is utterly ludicrous that you invoke Sheldrake as an explanation for certain of your tweaks and yet you ignore him here.
LOL!
Stu
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- How cute..... - unclestu 13:23:44 05/13/11 (7)
- So, now you're a probablity and randomness expert? LOL - geoffkait 14:10:25 05/13/11 (6)
- Whatever Geoff - unclestu 15:50:41 05/13/11 (5)
- RE: "If you want to call me an expert, that's your call, not mine." - geoffkait 16:30:51 05/13/11 (4)
- RE:Name dropper - unclestu 16:37:33 05/13/11 (3)
- What's in a name? - geoffkait 17:09:44 05/13/11 (2)
- RE: What's in a name? - OneTinSoldier 13:58:04 08/08/11 (1)
- RE: What's in a name? - geoffkait 14:24:04 08/08/11 (0)