In Reply to: D is for Density posted by geoffkait on May 9, 2011 at 17:50:23:
It was you, Mr Kait, who wrote to say that YOU were a rocket scientist and therefore knew more than anyone else. I am not ashamed of my background, nor of my education, which includes a BA in history although I basically finished my premed prerequisites (just needed inorganic chem), as well as a minor in sociology, and some 35 credits in applied music. But since you insinuated that you knew more than anyone else because you were a "rocket scientist", I enjoy watching you desperately searching for any explanation and apparently not even bothering to do even the most basic of research from the clues I left you.
Paul Kammerer defined seriality as " a recurrence of the same or similar things or events in time..." (Wikipedia). Jung was deeply interested in the same and actually kept a diary of events which which had relatively "amazing" coincidences. When Wolfgang Pauli was on the verge of a nervous breakdown and sought help from Jung, they both discovered their mutual interest in these coincidental events. Both wrote about it, as did Paul Kammerer. A simple google search would have turned all all of this. A similar google search on literature written about the terms would have also turned up quite a few articles written about it.
The "coincidental" groupings have a place in Pauli's quantum theory of exclusion, where he actually explains certain groupings on the quantum level for certain subatomic particles. But why the hell should I have to point this out to a "rocket" scientist?
Stu
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- LOL! - unclestu 18:24:33 05/09/11 (25)
- My recommendation - geoffkait 08:45:27 05/10/11 (24)
- LOL even harder! - unclestu 15:00:49 05/10/11 (23)
- More bluster from Mr. Bluster - geoffkait 15:18:06 05/10/11 (22)
- Hey! - unclestu 15:20:06 05/10/11 (21)
- RE: "If you don't know, how can any one else know?" - geoffkait 16:01:48 05/10/11 (20)
- One thing is for certain - unclestu 12:28:36 05/11/11 (19)
- How can you be so sure? - geoffkait 14:35:55 05/11/11 (18)
- LOL! - unclestu 15:10:40 05/11/11 (17)
- RE: "Why should we post ours if you hold back on yours?" - geoffkait 15:35:03 05/11/11 (16)
- Well, Mr. "THEORETICAL PHYSICIST" - unclestu 16:19:32 05/11/11 (15)
- Could you please drop some more names of people whose works you don't get?" - geoffkait 16:45:04 05/11/11 (14)
- Well then - unclestu 16:54:20 05/11/11 (13)
- Why would I beg for enlightenment from a rebar carrier? LOL nt - geoffkait 18:41:20 05/11/11 (12)
- There you go again - unclestu 14:46:57 05/12/11 (11)
- I feel your pain - geoffkait 15:47:27 05/12/11 (10)
- LOL! - unclestu 16:30:53 05/12/11 (9)
- He who laughs last laughs best - geoffkait 17:00:09 05/12/11 (8)
- How cute..... - unclestu 13:23:44 05/13/11 (7)
- So, now you're a probablity and randomness expert? LOL - geoffkait 14:10:25 05/13/11 (6)
- Whatever Geoff - unclestu 15:50:41 05/13/11 (5)
- RE: "If you want to call me an expert, that's your call, not mine." - geoffkait 16:30:51 05/13/11 (4)
- RE:Name dropper - unclestu 16:37:33 05/13/11 (3)
- What's in a name? - geoffkait 17:09:44 05/13/11 (2)
- RE: What's in a name? - OneTinSoldier 13:58:04 08/08/11 (1)
- RE: What's in a name? - geoffkait 14:24:04 08/08/11 (0)