In Reply to: RE: Bass reflex vs acoustic suspension vs inf. baffle posted by Scott L on September 10, 2016 at 03:31:05:
A closed box inherently will exhibit less overhang than a reflex box. That's inherent in the physics of the design. A reflex can be quite good properly designed but not as good. There is no way a reflex speaker can be done to have as little bass overhang as a closed box.
Reflex was hard to design before computers but with a good piece of software and a knowledgeable designer it's not a big deal any more. I've seen it done. I've seen a whole reflex speaker done in half a day with only fine tuning (personal preference) left to do after computer design.
I have woofer boxes that were designed to be used both ways that were well designed by a very good designer and it's obvious that while the reflex design is among the best the closed box is tighter.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Bass reflex vs acoustic suspension vs inf. baffle - hahax@verizon.net 05:59:03 09/10/16 (10)
- RE: Bass reflex vs acoustic suspension vs inf. baffle - Scott L 07:24:56 09/10/16 (9)
- RE: Bass reflex vs acoustic suspension vs inf. baffle - hahax@verizon.net 08:41:02 09/10/16 (8)
- RE: Bass reflex vs acoustic suspension vs inf. baffle - Scott L 09:47:34 09/10/16 (7)
- RE: Bass reflex vs acoustic suspension vs inf. baffle - hahax@verizon.net 11:28:39 09/10/16 (6)
- RE: Bass reflex vs acoustic suspension vs inf. baffle - Jeff 18:37:35 10/20/16 (0)
- RE: Bass reflex vs acoustic suspension vs inf. baffle - Scott L 04:02:30 09/11/16 (4)
- RE: Bass reflex vs acoustic suspension vs inf. baffle - hahax@verizon.net 05:48:52 09/11/16 (3)
- RE: Bass reflex vs acoustic suspension vs inf. baffle - Inmate51 09:32:16 10/21/16 (0)
- RE: Bass reflex vs acoustic suspension vs inf. baffle - Tom Brennan 06:41:16 09/18/16 (1)
- RE: Bass reflex vs acoustic suspension vs inf. baffle - horn kid 12:34:58 09/30/16 (0)