Hi
I have built these Karlson K15 cabs whith Beyma 15P80FE woofers (101dB/W driver senistivity). And a pair of 200Hz Tracstric horns with Radian 750 drivers (112dB/W sensitivity). I am not sure about the room/box/horn gain added.
For not loosing the 9dB difference in senistivity I figure a Bi-amp system would be very apealing. So my plan was to use my 300B SE tube amp (2x8W) for the horns, and a SS-amp (2x80w) or a Dynaco SCA-35 PP-tube amp (2x18W) for the bas woofers.
To get this working I have bought a miniDSP to be able to set the x-over and phase alignments easyly.
But this digital box (miniDSP) doesn´t "feel right" in an all analog system.
Which way would you guys go in this system ?
1. Bi-amp with a digital DSP in the system (using the drivers full sensitivity)
2. Making a analouge passive filter, using only the 300B SE tube amp (wasting 9dB senistivity in the horns)
3. Other sugestions?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - To Bi or not to Bi, that is the question.. - pix 22:15:12 07/02/15 (33)
- RE: To Bi or not to Bi, that is the question.. - mnawaz3@aol.com 11:07:04 09/01/15 (0)
- My first try was.. - pix 22:12:24 07/19/15 (0)
- RE: To Bi or not to Bi, that is the question.. - hollowboy 15:28:08 07/11/15 (0)
- RE: To Bi or not to Bi, that is the question.. - Cut-Throat 05:03:24 07/06/15 (0)
- RE: Tis Nobler to Bi-Amp - Mr_Steady 17:32:37 07/05/15 (0)
- RE: To Bi or not to Bi, that is the question.. - coli 12:13:22 07/04/15 (1)
- RE: To Bi or not to Bi, that is the question.. - pix 12:39:58 07/04/15 (0)
- KISS rules in audio... - drlowmu 16:59:48 07/03/15 (8)
- RE: KISS rules in audio... - Don Reid 19:09:35 07/13/15 (1)
- RE: KISS rules in audio... - Mr_Steady 17:36:15 07/15/15 (0)
- RE: KISS rules in audio... - pix 22:56:43 07/03/15 (5)
- RE: KISS rules in audio... - drlowmu 03:23:35 07/04/15 (4)
- RE: KISS rules in audio... - pix 07:51:22 07/04/15 (3)
- RE: KISS rules in audio... - pix 08:17:12 07/04/15 (2)
- RE: KISS rules in audio... - drlowmu 07:06:22 07/09/15 (0)
- Warning. Don't expect Jeff to... - 91derlust 21:10:46 07/04/15 (0)
- RE: To Bi or not to Bi, that is the question.. - Caucasian Blackplate 10:47:48 07/03/15 (1)
- RE: To Bi or not to Bi, that is the question.. - Mr_Steady 17:50:29 07/15/15 (0)
- RE: To Bi or not to Bi, that is the question.. - Kloss 08:06:38 07/03/15 (0)
- RE: To Bi or not to Bi, that is the question.. - Saturntube 07:49:55 07/03/15 (0)
- Yes, it is called an active crossover - Chip647 07:15:25 07/03/15 (2)
- There is the B4 by First Watt using JFETs - JoshK 09:57:59 07/03/15 (1)
- RE: There is the B4 by First Watt using JFETs - Mr. Lowther 09:05:55 07/09/15 (0)
- RE: To Bi or not to Bi, that is the question.. - belyin 22:40:27 07/02/15 (9)
- RE: To Bi or not to Bi, that is the question.. - pix 12:37:05 07/03/15 (8)
- RE: To Bi or not to Bi, that is the question.. - Rod M 19:25:09 07/03/15 (6)
- RE: To Bi or not to Bi, that is the question.. - pix 23:05:52 07/03/15 (5)
- RE: To Bi or not to Bi, that is the question.. - Rod M 06:50:41 07/04/15 (1)
- RE: To Bi or not to Bi, that is the question.. - tomservo 14:30:37 07/04/15 (0)
- Of course - drlowmu 03:30:25 07/04/15 (2)
- Acoustical measurements or datasheet? - pix 10:47:42 07/04/15 (1)
- RE: Acoustical measurements or datasheet? - drlowmu 07:12:49 07/09/15 (0)
- RE: To Bi or not to Bi, that is the question.. - belyin 13:07:53 07/03/15 (0)