In Reply to: RE: Higher "Rez" Seems to Offer Lower Overall Quality posted by Isaak J. Garvey on September 25, 2016 at 10:19:18:
I simply expressed an opinion based on an observation that I had made. I was perfectly open to opposing opinions, observations, and maybe a change of perspective based on new evidence and farther guided experimentation.
It was not my intention to enter into a digital dick measuring contest, but that was where you decided to take it. Thank you for all of your constructive sneers and criticisms. I will go on and listen to what actually sounds good. You are free to enjoy your confirmation bias, wishful thinking, and theory trumps real world experience fueled superior technology to your heart's content. You have earned it. Enjoy it.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Higher "Rez" Seems to Offer Lower Overall Quality - jaydacus 20:38:35 09/25/16 (5)
- Well, even conspiracy theories need their smoking gun. What's yours? - jdaniel@jps.net 18:16:29 09/26/16 (0)
- 24/192 tracks to their 16/44 counterparts - Roseval 04:19:20 09/26/16 (3)
- RE: 24/192 tracks to their 16/44 counterparts - ahendler 11:51:35 09/26/16 (2)
- RE: 24/192 tracks to their 16/44 counterparts - Tony Lauck 18:03:01 09/30/16 (1)
- RE: 24/192 tracks to their 16/44 counterparts - ahendler 21:34:54 09/30/16 (0)