In Reply to: couple of points posted by bwb on January 8, 2012 at 18:42:57:
well, looking at the title of your message, it looks like you have a problem counting beyond two.....
kidding :-)
1. I have no idea who Mikel is
=>use the search function.
2. never been to Teresa's site so no idea about that
=>search under the "teresa" moniker and get access to her latest musings on analog playback.
3. the number of SACD's is never going to grow to a significant portion of releases, it is a dead format
=>at the beginning of year 2003, sacd releases was raining down like a tropical thunderstorm. then it slowed down dramatically into a drizzle after fundings to sacd record labels were cut and pressing plants converted some of the lines into making blu-ray discs.
4. you still haven't answered why you would invest your time and money into promoting a format which is basically dead.
=> from year 2001 till early 2003, sacd was progressing really well. all that 48K pieces of sacd sampler discs were sold in that 3 year period.
.5 Your conjecture that more SACD titles will be released seems overly optimistic.
=> sacd did died. does saying it then in the year 2003 make me some kind of prophet :-)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: couple of points - jeromelang 19:22:10 01/08/12 (5)
- your fairy tale has a fatal flaw - bwb 21:32:05 01/09/12 (4)
- Your reading reveal a fatal flaw in your intelligence - jeromelang 00:08:09 01/10/12 (3)
- no, I took a test and they said I can read and comprehend very well - bwb 07:09:08 01/10/12 (2)
- It's ok - jeromelang 08:12:34 01/10/12 (1)
- RE: It's ok - Tony Lauck 17:48:29 01/11/12 (0)