In Reply to: see pg.73 WidescreenReview Vol 12 No2 Issue 69 posted by Joe Murphy Jr on January 27, 2003 at 11:54:38:
as far as I know there is nothing on the consumer market that can decode 192khz DTS, nor lossless DTS. That's saved for the theatres.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - OMG..... It is believed Warner dropping PCM entirely for DTS/DD {nt} - sammy 07:56:57 01/27/03 (114)
- That isn't going to happen - PCM is the MAIN part of the DVD-A spec. (nt)` - Maven 15:31:05 01/27/03 (0)
- No they can't do 192/24 DTS - but... - Michi 10:58:38 01/27/03 (101)
- The same place you get your information, Michelle. - Jim Pearce 21:26:55 01/27/03 (75)
- Grow up. - Michi 00:50:42 01/28/03 (74)
- When you do grow up, you'll know a baseless rumour... - Jim Pearce 07:22:01 01/28/03 (73)
- Verance being audible is a baseless rumor? - Michi 11:16:58 01/28/03 (72)
- Useless to go on on the watermark issue - Frank 12:02:45 01/28/03 (37)
- There are no artifacts. That is marketing rubbish and UNPROVEN {nt} - SnaggS 00:34:08 01/29/03 (36)
- I have heard them - Frank 01:39:06 01/29/03 (35)
- Ok... - Methos 10:10:36 01/29/03 (34)
- Re: Ok... - Frank 10:59:25 01/29/03 (33)
- CHSAM223 BUCKY PIZZARELLI/SWING LIVE M-CH/2-CH SACD... - Methos 11:14:45 01/29/03 (2)
- Re: CHSAM223 BUCKY PIZZARELLI/SWING LIVE M-CH/2-CH SACD... - Frank 11:25:13 01/29/03 (1)
- Specific discs? Sonys or Telarcs preferred...I have only the Chesky sampler and Carla Lother... - Methos 11:28:07 01/29/03 (0)
- Very well...I shall purchase this one, and investigate. BTW, how do you know you are hearing DSD... - Methos 11:05:57 01/29/03 (29)
- Frank, I am also curious about your answer to this one... - Eric LeRouge 12:32:41 01/29/03 (28)
- DSD's limited ability to handle HF percussion is clearly audible. - Jim Pearce 12:47:07 01/29/03 (21)
- It doesn't seem to be audible whatsoever, except to a very small number of DVD-A adherents... - Methos 13:23:06 01/29/03 (4)
- 'reputable magazine ' ? - Frank 13:34:36 01/29/03 (3)
- No, they're always recognised in the tech measurements section. In fact, much ink is often spilled.. - Methos 13:45:32 01/29/03 (2)
- Re: No, they're always recognised in the tech measurements section. In fact, much ink is often spill - Frank 13:54:38 01/29/03 (1)
- Do I maintain that SET amps are always more musical than push-pull SS designs? No... - Methos 15:14:50 01/29/03 (0)
- "I can name at least three discs off the top of my head." Please do, with at least the track if not - Methos 13:00:13 01/29/03 (15)
- Methos, try this one... - Jim Pearce 13:34:03 01/29/03 (14)
- can you provide another example? - Christine Tham 22:24:38 01/29/03 (7)
- Re: can you provide another example? - Jim Pearce 06:44:45 01/30/03 (6)
- Re: can you provide another example? - Christine Tham 11:42:04 01/30/03 (5)
- Re: can you provide another example? - Jim Pearce 12:01:59 01/30/03 (4)
- no you recall incorrectly - Christine Tham 14:24:10 01/30/03 (3)
- My normal listening level is 70dB, not 80 dB. - Jim Pearce 20:24:14 01/30/03 (2)
- no - i have never stated what my "normal" listening level is - Christine Tham 21:34:43 01/30/03 (1)
- I listen to too much vinyl. - Jim Pearce 22:24:43 01/30/03 (0)
- "more clearer" ... need "more education" ? {nt} - SnaggS 16:08:06 01/29/03 (1)
- A slip of the digit. You can't spell cat.nt - Jim Pearce 20:45:07 01/29/03 (0)
- Excellent, I have that one. - Methos 13:49:42 01/29/03 (3)
- This is getting interesting (nt) - Eric LeRouge 14:03:29 01/29/03 (2)
- don't get your hopes up... - tunenut 22:01:09 01/29/03 (1)
- Agreed. - Jim Pearce 07:09:29 01/30/03 (0)
- Re: Frank, I am also curious about your answer to this one... - Frank 12:46:09 01/29/03 (5)
- Thanks. + Some more impressions... - Eric LeRouge 14:28:31 01/29/03 (4)
- Re: Thanks. + Some more impressions... - Zoltan 06:55:48 01/30/03 (1)
- Interesting - Eric LeRouge 04:04:07 01/31/03 (0)
- Re: Thanks. + Some more impressions... - Frank 06:04:18 01/30/03 (1)
- Thanks, I'll try them - Eric LeRouge 03:55:01 01/31/03 (0)
- I mean Warner dropping PCM. - Jim Pearce 11:36:45 01/28/03 (33)
- Well, OK. I definitely do listen to DVD-A's though. heh. - Michi 17:33:14 01/28/03 (0)
- question - Joe Murphy Jr 11:49:11 01/28/03 (31)
- In the artist's interest no, but with labels such as Warner, the artist doesn't own or control it. - Michi 17:34:25 01/28/03 (3)
- Why not ? - Frank 01:37:35 01/29/03 (2)
- I know. That's what I used to encode Verance for. - Michi 05:25:04 01/31/03 (1)
- Re: I know. That's what I used to encode Verance for. - Frank 06:20:00 01/31/03 (0)
- Re: question - Frank 12:07:42 01/28/03 (26)
- It was a "yes" or "no" question - Joe Murphy Jr 16:01:19 01/28/03 (25)
- Yes - Frank 09:11:27 01/29/03 (13)
- Thank you for your honest answer. - Joe Murphy Jr 11:15:45 01/29/03 (1)
- Re: Thank you for your honest answer. - Frank 12:12:11 01/29/03 (0)
- they won't - tunenut 10:05:06 01/29/03 (10)
- Not yet. - Frank 11:18:55 01/29/03 (9)
- you are right but... - tunenut 11:27:10 01/29/03 (8)
- Tunenut, don't be too quick to generalize. - Jim Pearce 11:39:50 01/29/03 (7)
- just for fun... - tunenut 22:48:05 01/29/03 (2)
- Re: just for fun... - Frank 07:28:12 01/31/03 (1)
- this is just for fun... - tunenut 09:29:41 01/31/03 (0)
- steganography is here to stay... - tunenut 13:12:47 01/29/03 (3)
- Re: steganography is here to stay... - Frank 13:46:00 01/29/03 (1)
- I have a guitar... - tunenut 13:55:42 01/29/03 (0)
- Well stated. nt - Methos 13:25:11 01/29/03 (0)
- Artists sign their paintings. - Jim Pearce 21:42:29 01/28/03 (10)
- A watermark is NOT an artist's signature. - Joe Murphy Jr 11:36:07 01/29/03 (2)
- As a photographer, its easy. - Jim Pearce 12:16:30 01/29/03 (1)
- Then I speak to you as BOTH -- - Joe Murphy Jr 17:31:53 01/29/03 (0)
- a spurious comparison - tunenut 10:11:03 01/29/03 (6)
- I agree with your post above: it will disappear. - Jim Pearce 10:44:02 01/29/03 (5)
- no I can't... - tunenut 11:13:20 01/29/03 (4)
- Chicken egg or egg chicken problem - Frank 12:19:27 01/29/03 (3)
- the egg of course!!! (NT) - tunenut 12:59:17 01/29/03 (2)
- Marilyn vos Savant had a well-reasoned answer to that question in her column.. - Methos 14:34:08 01/29/03 (1)
- there should be a separate board for the chicken/egg discussion... - tunenut 14:37:59 01/29/03 (0)
- see pg.73 WidescreenReview Vol 12 No2 Issue 69 - Joe Murphy Jr 11:54:38 01/27/03 (24)
- As far as DTS, Inc's codecs, yes, but - - Michi 17:02:07 01/27/03 (0)
- From what I can gather from the DTS specs you are right. At least up to 24/96 5.1 lossless should... - LarsB 12:30:46 01/27/03 (3)
- Re: DTS - John Kotches 15:33:03 01/27/03 (2)
- What would it take to alter the Dvd-Video Spec to include 192kHz LPCM? Thx. n/t - HiFi Connasewer 15:40:32 01/27/03 (1)
- Re: A replacement for DVD-Video - John Kotches 16:10:12 01/27/03 (0)
- Re: Never Trust Widescreen Review - NotMe 12:17:55 01/27/03 (18)
- Hmm... better get the stocks of DVD-A's whilst theyre still made - SnaggS 15:58:40 01/27/03 (0)
- What are you debating? - Joe Murphy Jr 14:41:24 01/27/03 (5)
- Joe, I said--- - Michi 01:11:20 01/28/03 (1)
- "The lossless version is also not available for HT or to consumers", the future ? - SnaggS 07:31:09 01/28/03 (0)
- Re: What are you debating? - NotMe 19:28:26 01/27/03 (1)
- Noone else - Joe Murphy Jr 19:50:33 01/27/03 (0)
- So would 6mbits DTS still be Hirez (i.e. better than CD ?) - SnaggS 16:01:18 01/27/03 (0)
- You are uttering complete nonsense - Frank 12:23:48 01/27/03 (10)
- Re: No, You're Spouting Nonsense. Read... - NotMe 19:18:51 01/27/03 (7)
- You misunderstand the documentation. - Frank 00:18:37 01/28/03 (5)
- Re: No Misunderstanding Here - The Documentation is Clear - NotMe 12:00:17 01/28/03 (4)
- Re: No Misunderstanding Here - The Documentation is Clear - Frank 07:35:46 01/29/03 (3)
- Re: No Misunderstanding Here - The Documentation is Clear - NotMe 09:43:52 01/29/03 (2)
- Re: No Misunderstanding Here - The Documentation is Clear - Frank 12:32:04 01/29/03 (1)
- Re: Beating a Dead Horse. - NotMe 21:40:10 01/29/03 (0)
- >>>384kb/s is dedicated to the utterly pointless<<< - Joe Murphy Jr 19:32:52 01/27/03 (0)
- Re: You are uttering complete nonsense - John Kotches 15:36:49 01/27/03 (1)
- I think DTS 24/96 is more "marketing"... - Joe Murphy Jr 19:18:42 01/27/03 (0)
- Calm down kids! He means Kurt Warner (St Louis Rams) - Joe Murphy Jr 10:27:02 01/27/03 (0)
- I know this will sound like I'm an evil traitor but......... - HiFi Connasewer 09:09:50 01/27/03 (7)
- Re: I know this will sound like I'm an evil traitor but......... - NotMe 12:21:28 01/27/03 (0)
- I don't see your point. You can do that on a CD. (nt) - Eric LeRouge 09:26:35 01/27/03 (5)
- Re: I don't see your point. You can do that on a CD. (nt) - HiFi Connasewer 11:27:19 01/27/03 (4)
- >>>5.1 DD/DTS + stereo 96kHz/24bit LPCM disc<<< - Joe Murphy Jr 11:45:28 01/27/03 (3)
- I'll second that also, except... - Eric LeRouge 16:44:07 01/27/03 (2)
- >>>still image<<< - Joe Murphy Jr 19:24:19 01/27/03 (1)
- You can scan Pirelli calendars as your picture gallery, as well (nt :-) - Eric LeRouge 04:45:27 01/28/03 (0)
- Nonsense. - Jim Pearce 08:47:52 01/27/03 (0)
- 'It is believed' . . . . by whom exactly? - Martin says 08:41:43 01/27/03 (0)
Follow Ups
- As far as DTS, Inc's codecs, yes, but - - Michi 17:02:07 01/27/03 (0)