In Reply to: This is not some tit-for-tat Mr Young . . . posted by Martin419 on December 5, 2006 at 07:37:38:
I'll break my own rule because you have missed the mark here by quite a bit. I really think you misunderstood my post: "tit-for-tat" wasn't even on the radar. It was you, if you'll recall, who questioned whether I was interested in hi-rez. If YOU had bothered to do the same type of search (actually, easier) that you accused me of being unable to do for you, you too would have found information that contradicts your earlier assessment.I am certainly willing to concede that you are a more serious forum participant than Mssr. KEKL could ever be, but that doesn't excuse you from over-the-top preaching to the already-converted. I certainly didn't accuse you of trolling, nor did I imply that you should be embarrassed by whatever equipment you may own. You are projecting if you think I did.
Again, cheers, and enjoy some music.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- So much for thwe concept of the "last word..." - robert young 08:42:42 12/05/06 (0)