In Reply to: Blind testing assumes that one steps in the same river twice posted by Jay Buridan on November 7, 2016 at 14:46:05:
Nt
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Blind testing, like any testing, is not foolproof. Nt - geoffkait 03:24:11 11/08/16 (13)
- RE: Blind testing, like any testing, is not foolproof. Nt - hahax@verizon.net 05:22:46 11/08/16 (12)
- RE: Blind testing, like any testing, is not foolproof. Nt - geoffkait 05:27:54 11/08/16 (11)
- RE: Blind testing, like any testing, is not foolproof. Nt - hahax@verizon.net 12:14:43 11/08/16 (10)
- Blind testing is a hypothesis test and has the same mathematical rules - Timbo in Oz 19:02:17 11/08/16 (9)
- RE: Blind testing is a hypothesis test and has the same mathematical rules - geoffkait 05:41:44 11/09/16 (8)
- Go jump in the lake, Geoff. - Timbo in Oz 00:29:11 11/10/16 (7)
- Is that your best argument? - geoffkait 04:22:13 11/10/16 (6)
- It wasn't an argument it was a suggestion - Analog Scott 14:19:20 11/19/16 (5)
- RE: It wasn't an argument it was a suggestion - geoffkait 16:58:45 11/23/16 (3)
- RE: It wasn't an argument it was a suggestion - Analog Scott 14:03:38 11/24/16 (2)
- RE: It wasn't an argument it was a suggestion - geoffkait 03:57:57 11/25/16 (1)
- Is that your best argument? - Analog Scott 10:04:32 11/25/16 (0)
- you got it in one, and most music isn't made up of sustained notes, - Timbo in Oz 22:25:13 11/19/16 (0)