|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
|
|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: RE: On the blurriness of MQA posted by BubbaMike on November 2, 2016 at 13:08:13:
Seemingly endless objections to MQA on AA and elsewhere. What is the point?
1. Most objectors have never heard MQA.
2. It has not yet reached the consumer market except in a very limited way.
3. Its primary purpose at this juncture seems to relate to streaming media where , whatever its limitations, it promises better sound than exists is this medium now.
4. Do people think that perhaps their arguments (often technically incorrect) may influence Bob Stuart to change it?
Why waste time now on this subject when in there is a real and present problem with digitally distributed recordings - the use of watermarking. Yet the comparative amount of forum postings on this subject is fractional.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- The point of these points is lost on me. - PAR 01:16:04 11/03/16 (4)
- The point is to discuss the merits of an emerging product that is starting to penetrate the market - Dave_K 11:07:23 11/03/16 (1)
- RE: The point is to discuss the merits of an emerging product that is starting to penetrate the market - fmak 12:06:10 11/03/16 (0)
- What is the point - fmak 07:31:32 11/03/16 (1)
- Hear, hear! - Doug Schneider 07:34:23 11/03/16 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
