In Reply to: RE: Many reasons... posted by Jim Austin on October 29, 2016 at 14:19:43:
Why on earth would any music company upsample red book asynchronously to 24 192 to archive? There are actually much better technical reasons to archive in DSD or DXD.
Upsampling leaves its own sonic signature depending on the software used. The question of whether touch up software will be used is another question. The marketing phrase 'master quality' that I first encountered in Linn downloads has no real meaning as it depends on the native recording rates and bit depths.
Archiving valuable analog recordings is a subject in itself and should not in any way be linked to MQA.
AS a matter of fact, when one compares the resampled 2L files to the DXD masters, they all sound different. The 2L MQA files played backed on HQ dacs are nothing to shout about either.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Many reasons...I'm sure, 192/24 - fmak 08:41:05 10/30/16 (5)
- RE: Many reasons...I'm sure, 192/24 - Jim Austin 09:11:08 10/30/16 (4)
- MQA process appears to be accelerating the pace of digitizing analog tapes - fmak 12:49:47 10/30/16 (0)
- RE: Many reasons...I'm sure, 192/24 - Isaak J. Garvey 09:35:17 10/30/16 (2)
- RE: Many reasons...I'm sure, 192/24 - Jim Austin 09:56:03 10/30/16 (1)
- RE: Many reasons...I'm sure, 192/24 - Isaak J. Garvey 12:23:46 10/30/16 (0)