In Reply to: RE: MQA files sound very good on a good posted by Jim Austin on October 29, 2016 at 11:48:27:
Fair enough Jim. But on the flip side, what about the the repeated, immensely positive reporting on MQA by reviewers who have their mind set ON MQA. Does not it work both ways?
And the initial tide overwhelming positive write ups were based on carefully controlled show demos and later with a $300 portable DAC.
Can you at least understand the push back considering the reporting that was done on the so called "DSD 2.0" roll out?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: MQA files sound very good on a good - Isaak J. Garvey 14:20:22 10/29/16 (2)
- RE: MQA files sound very good on a good - Jim Austin 14:52:05 10/29/16 (1)
- RE: MQA files sound very good on a good - Isaak J. Garvey 15:19:23 10/29/16 (0)