In Reply to: RE: MQA hype, will this kill the industry? An observation from a consumer posted by Jim Austin on October 29, 2016 at 08:44:46:
Not true when comparing the 2L DXD files with the MQA ones.
You Stereophile associated posters need to get off your MQA horse by not just reporting what Bob Stuart and associates say, but consider the interests of consumers who have so far not been able to assess properly the pros and cons of the format.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- MQA files sound very good on a good - fmak 09:22:41 10/29/16 (18)
- RE: MQA files sound very good on a good - Jim Austin 11:48:27 10/29/16 (11)
- RE: MQA files sound very good on a good - Isaak J. Garvey 14:20:22 10/29/16 (2)
- RE: MQA files sound very good on a good - Jim Austin 14:52:05 10/29/16 (1)
- RE: MQA files sound very good on a good - Isaak J. Garvey 15:19:23 10/29/16 (0)
- RE: MQA files sound very good on a good - ahendler 13:52:47 10/29/16 (2)
- RE: MQA files sound very good on a good - Jim Austin 14:07:33 10/29/16 (1)
- Plenty of examples... - mlsstl 08:52:43 10/31/16 (0)
- Link? - bullethead 13:34:07 10/29/16 (4)
- RE: MQA files sound very good on a good - Jim Austin 09:51:29 10/29/16 (5)
- What is there to misunderstand? - fmak 11:14:57 10/29/16 (4)
- RE: What is there to misunderstand? - Jim Austin 11:40:59 10/29/16 (3)
- very obviously - fmak 12:04:08 10/29/16 (2)
- RE: very obviously - Jim Austin 12:05:36 10/29/16 (1)
- Be polite, or be gone - fmak 21:47:48 10/29/16 (0)