Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Art Dudley: The Goodness of Your Heart: A Tragedy in One Act - Isaak J. Garvey 08:05:59 05/18/16 (116)

• The next controversy will use names "Harry" and "Willy" ... otherwise will be same regurgitated tripe. nt - bjh 11:55:40 05/24/16 (1)
• RE: The next controversy will use names "Harry" and "Willy" ... otherwise will be same regurgitated tripe. nt - Isaak J. Garvey 12:18:04 05/24/16 (0)
• RE: Art Dudley: The Goodness of Your Heart: A Tragedy in One Act - lateboomer 20:54:42 05/23/16 (8)
• RE: "would we be better off if this article was not published?" - Ivan303 09:03:42 05/24/16 (3)
• RE: "would we be better off if this article was not published?" - John Atkinson 10:27:31 05/24/16 (2)
• John you should have your own forum here. - hawkmoon 14:33:36 05/24/16 (1)
• He kinda does... - Ivan303 15:17:59 05/24/16 (0)
• RE: Art Dudley: The Goodness of Your Heart: A Tragedy in One Act - Isaak J. Garvey 21:04:28 05/23/16 (3)
• If I had read you post before writing mine, above... - Ivan303 09:05:35 05/24/16 (2)
• RE: If I had read you post before writing mine, above... - Isaak J. Garvey 09:55:15 05/24/16 (1)
• Um, I would say this is Art Dudley's "area of expertise." - Ladok 11:23:46 05/24/16 (0)
• In days former, Art Dudley might have suggested... - Ladok 12:46:45 05/23/16 (0)
• RE: Art Dudley: The Goodness of Your Heart: A Tragedy in One Act - Jeff Starr 17:46:25 05/22/16 (13)
• RE: Art Dudley: The Goodness of Your Heart: A Tragedy in One Act - Ivan303 07:23:26 05/23/16 (10)
• If the tables were turned.... - 4everyoung 08:43:55 05/23/16 (4)
• Good point... - mkuller 16:26:49 05/23/16 (3)
• RE: Good point... - RGA 18:16:01 05/23/16 (2)
• No reviewer... - mkuller 19:06:32 05/23/16 (1)
• RE: No reviewer... - RGA 19:36:25 05/23/16 (0)
• RE: Art Dudley: The Goodness of Your Heart: A Tragedy in One Act - John Atkinson 07:44:16 05/23/16 (4)
• Consider it a compliment, John... - Ivan303 13:57:36 05/23/16 (1)
• Exactly (nt) - Dave_K 15:32:47 05/23/16 (0)
• RE: Art Dudley: The Goodness of Your Heart: A Tragedy in One Act - sautterj6 09:14:04 05/23/16 (1)
• Hi johns dad! - The Bored 11:19:36 05/23/16 (0)
• Well said! nt - Beetlemania 21:48:56 05/22/16 (0)
• Thanks, Jeff. Much obliged! (NT) - Bill Leebens 19:06:16 05/22/16 (0)
• "Assclown"?? Let's get a few things straight.... - Bill Leebens 14:22:22 05/22/16 (21)
• RE: "Assclown"?? Let's get a few things straight.... - Ivan303 14:55:27 05/23/16 (0)
• Please explain what benefit acrues to us from that piece. - Rick W 10:25:35 05/23/16 (2)
• A better question: what benefit accrues from responding to this? As far as I can see, there is none. (NT) - Bill Leebens 11:34:43 05/23/16 (1)
• Could be some for us. But apparently no benefit to you, no response. nt - Rick W 12:03:03 05/23/16 (0)
• An eloquent response for those whom delight in character assassination - Cleantimestream 06:04:17 05/23/16 (0)
• RE: "Assclown"?? Let's get a few things straight.... - Dave_K 17:30:24 05/22/16 (2)
• This is typical... - Bill Leebens 18:00:41 05/22/16 (1)
• What did you expect readers to take away? - Dave_K 11:08:20 05/23/16 (0)
• RE: "Assclown"?? Let's get a few things straight.... - Isaak J. Garvey 14:44:57 05/22/16 (12)
• RE: Pay for Play - John Atkinson 15:28:40 05/22/16 (1)
• RE: Pay for Play - Isaak J. Garvey 15:33:40 05/22/16 (0)
• To clarify: - Bill Leebens 14:49:13 05/22/16 (9)
• Hey Bill... - mkuller 14:53:07 05/25/16 (1)
• RE: Hey Bill... - Isaak J. Garvey 18:05:42 05/25/16 (0)
• RE: To clarify: - Isaak J. Garvey 14:53:11 05/22/16 (6)
• RE: To clarify: - sautterj6 09:42:39 05/23/16 (4)
• RE: To clarify: - Isaak J. Garvey 10:09:21 05/23/16 (3)
• RE: To clarify: - Jeff Starr 11:12:33 05/23/16 (2)
• RE: To clarify: - Isaak J. Garvey 11:22:43 05/23/16 (1)
• RE: To clarify: - Jeff Starr 11:48:13 05/23/16 (0)
• Well, yeah. ;-) (nt) - Bill Leebens 15:08:39 05/22/16 (0)
• it no longer matters. There are enough options that some being bought no longer means anything Truth will out - Smelly_Socks 05:39:00 05/21/16 (25)
• It's not a moot point.... - Ivan303 06:49:00 05/21/16 (24)
• RE: It's not a moot point.... - John Atkinson 15:00:35 05/21/16 (23)
• RE: It's not a moot point.... - jamesgarvin 12:20:07 05/24/16 (0)
• RE: It's not a moot point.... - Ivan303 16:55:10 05/21/16 (21)
• RE: It's not a moot point.... - John Atkinson 08:37:31 05/22/16 (17)
• A tad on the holier than thou side IMO. - Rick W 10:20:20 05/22/16 (15)
• RE: A tad on the holier than thou side IMO. - Dave Pogue 14:48:34 05/22/16 (1)
• I'm sure you're not alone. Srajan's *announced* policy just doen't bother me. - Rick W 15:55:31 05/22/16 (0)
• RE: A tad on the holier than thou side IMO. - John Atkinson 12:34:21 05/22/16 (12)
• I'm blown away - Beetlemania 14:25:41 05/22/16 (9)
• Don't be (blown away) - DAP 08:12:37 05/24/16 (0)
• Stereophile is the lightning rod because they are the one spreading dirty rumors about their competition (nt) - Dave_K 15:08:37 05/22/16 (7)
• Except that related ethical lapses are confirmed by a former writer. nt - Beetlemania 15:44:38 05/22/16 (5)
• How do you figure? - Dave_K 17:06:51 05/22/16 (4)
• RE: How do you figure? - 4everyoung 05:01:59 05/23/16 (1)
• On the contrary - DAP 08:09:07 05/24/16 (0)
• I didn't mean to imply directly related - Beetlemania 17:20:39 05/22/16 (1)
• OK - Dave_K 17:38:46 05/22/16 (0)
• RE: Stereophile is the lightning rod because they are the one spreading dirty rumors about their competition (nt) - Isaak J. Garvey 15:34:57 05/22/16 (0)
• Yes, I agree with your mentor. But....... - Rick W 13:06:24 05/22/16 (1)
• RE: Yes, I agree with your mentor. But....... - Isaak J. Garvey 13:26:31 05/22/16 (0)
• RE: It's not a moot point.... - Ivan303 09:28:01 05/22/16 (0)
• RE: It's not a moot point.... - 4everyoung 20:00:02 05/21/16 (2)
• RE: It's not a moot point.... - Jim Austin 11:33:21 05/29/16 (0)
• Perhaps an oversight on the part of Mr. Dudley... - Ivan303 20:32:09 05/21/16 (0)
• I find this kind of innuendo to be pretty distasteful - Dave_K 09:41:52 05/20/16 (13)
• Agree, and well said. nt - Rick W 12:03:29 05/21/16 (0)
• Hard to understand how PSAudio gains much here... - Ivan303 18:08:28 05/20/16 (0)
• RE: I find this kind of innuendo to be pretty distasteful - Isaak J. Garvey 10:01:00 05/20/16 (10)
• Perhaps there is some degree of self-righteousness but . . . - Beetlemania 10:11:42 05/20/16 (9)
• RE: "worthwhile for Stereophile to distinguish itself from media with dubious ethics." - Ivan303 18:11:58 05/20/16 (0)
• the TAS/JV cable debacle was different - DAP 12:36:07 05/20/16 (2)
• RE: "I'm very disappointed with the moderators that they allow this" - Ivan303 19:11:28 05/20/16 (1)
• "To post a link and comment on a piece on the Stereophile web site?" - DAP 07:23:28 05/24/16 (0)
• This isn't distinguishing Stereophile in a positive way - Dave_K 11:14:57 05/20/16 (1)
• Yup. /n - Ivan303 18:12:30 05/20/16 (0)
• RE: Perhaps there is some degree of self-righteousness but . . . - Isaak J. Garvey 10:19:24 05/20/16 (2)
• RE: Perhaps there is some degree of self-righteousness but . . . - mkuller 12:35:38 05/20/16 (1)
• RE: Perhaps there is some degree of self-righteousness but . . . - Isaak J. Garvey 12:44:34 05/20/16 (0)
• Isaak, my take it is.... - Rod M 17:44:15 05/19/16 (14)
• RE: Isaak, my take it is.... - Isaak J. Garvey 17:47:40 05/19/16 (13)
• I can loan you $25 if you need it - 4everyoung 07:59:04 05/20/16 (12)
• RE: I can loan you $25 if you need it - A.Wayne 09:27:41 05/24/16 (3)
• Ya know.... - 4everyoung 08:57:32 05/25/16 (2)
• RE: Ya know.... - bwaslo 21:31:04 05/31/16 (1)
• RE: Ya know.... - 4everyoung 11:13:27 06/01/16 (0)
• RE: I can loan you $25 if you need it - slovell1 16:25:07 05/20/16 (0)
• BOOM ! - Beetlemania 09:44:01 05/20/16 (0)
• I realize you can't tell us who the manufacturer was, but - DAP 09:29:31 05/20/16 (5)
• RE: I realize you can't tell us who the manufacturer was, but - 4everyoung 10:27:34 05/20/16 (4)
• And I thought your $25 subject line was a hint to the size of the bribe! - DAP 07:57:15 05/24/16 (1)
• RE: And I thought your $25 subject line was a hint to the size of the bribe! - 4everyoung 10:31:34 05/24/16 (0)
• Were the speakers worth it and do you still have them? - Ivan303 20:08:43 05/20/16 (0)
• Holy cow! - Beetlemania 10:48:12 05/20/16 (0)
• RE: Art Dudley: The Goodness of Your Heart: A Tragedy in One Act - RGA 17:03:31 05/19/16 (7)
• RE: Art Dudley: The Goodness of Your Heart: A Tragedy in One Act - Isaak J. Garvey 17:27:32 05/19/16 (6)
• RE: Art Dudley: The Goodness of Your Heart: A Tragedy in One Act - RGA 21:14:46 05/19/16 (5)
• RE: Art Dudley: The Goodness of Your Heart: A Tragedy in One Act - Isaak J. Garvey 07:20:04 05/20/16 (4)
• RE: Art Dudley: The Goodness of Your Heart: A Tragedy in One Act - RGA 21:04:02 05/20/16 (3)
• RE: Art Dudley: The Goodness of Your Heart: A Tragedy in One Act - A.Wayne 11:39:34 05/24/16 (1)
• RE: Art Dudley: The Goodness of Your Heart: A Tragedy in One Act - RGA 00:07:41 05/25/16 (0)
• RE: Art Dudley: The Goodness of Your Heart: A Tragedy in One Act - slovell1 21:11:01 05/20/16 (0)
• What a weird take. - Dave Pogue 08:59:27 05/19/16 (2)
• RE: What a weird take. - Isaak J. Garvey 10:27:49 05/19/16 (1)
• Now do you understand? - Dave Pogue 14:43:12 05/22/16 (0)
• RE: Art Dudley: The Goodness of Your Heart: A Tragedy in One Act - johns dad 06:10:51 05/19/16 (0)
• RE: Art Dudley: The Goodness of Your Heart: A Tragedy in One Act - fantja 10:27:52 05/18/16 (0)

Follow Ups

• The next controversy will use names "Harry" and "Willy" ... otherwise will be same regurgitated tripe. nt - bjh 11:55:40 05/24/16 (1)
• RE: The next controversy will use names "Harry" and "Willy" ... otherwise will be same regurgitated tripe. nt - Isaak J. Garvey 12:18:04 05/24/16 (0)