|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
|
|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: TAS Editor's comments defending the review process posted by uw312@aol.com on May 22, 2004 at 13:08:44:
"The fact that manufacturers are aware of probable favorable reviews from their loan of products doesnt provide much evidence for pure motives of reviewers, in my opinion."The last really critical (rather than negative) review in TAS was written on the Thiel 7.2 by Robert E. Greene several years ago, before Harley's time. I have never read a negative review of a major manufacturer since. I concur with your view that manufacturers wouldn't seem to need to "bribe" TAS reviewers since they get favorable reviews anyway. And no measurements are provided (as in Stereophile) to at least expose the engineering prowes of each manufacturer. IMHO most reviewers write bosh anyway.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: TAS Editor's comments defending the review process - hexenboden 18:40:07 05/23/04 (2)
- Re: TAS Editor's comments defending the review process - Sean 01:02:15 05/25/04 (1)
- Harley's sentence... - LarryB 07:35:37 05/25/04 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
