Amp/Preamp Asylum Looking for a new Amp or Preamp? If you're after tubes, post over here. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Marantz PM 6006/7005 vs Yamaha S 501 posted by wjoehughes@gmail.com on January 15, 2017 at 15:01:50:
NAD went through a period where they had a terrible QC problem. They have since started to over see their operations and restore proper QC.
I have several fairly newer NAD pieces and never had a problem with either of them.
But as with ANY!!!!! electrical component there is a chance you could get a problem one. Make sure if you buy it new that it has a guarantee, like from Crutchfield.
If you are buying it used MAKE SURE you find out about any previous repairs!!!!!!
The NADs are quite good. I'm a Marantz man and if I had to pick one it would be the C356BEE
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Marantz PM 6006/7005 vs Yamaha S 501 - airtime 16:52:06 01/15/17 (8)
- RE: Marantz PM 6006/7005 vs Yamaha S 501 - wjoehughes@gmail.com 21:06:15 01/15/17 (7)
- RE: Marantz PM 6006/7005 vs Yamaha S 501 - airtime 07:58:45 01/16/17 (3)
- RE: Marantz PM 6006/7005 vs Yamaha S 501 - wjoehughes@gmail.com 09:59:15 01/16/17 (2)
- RE: Marantz PM 6006/7005 vs Yamaha S 501 - Bill the K 04:33:56 01/20/17 (0)
- RE: Marantz PM 6006/7005 vs Yamaha S 501 - airtime 17:35:13 01/17/17 (0)
- RE: Marantz PM 6006/7005 vs Yamaha S 501 - lancelot 06:59:20 01/16/17 (0)
- RE: Marantz PM 6006/7005 vs Yamaha S 501 - wjoehughes@gmail.com 22:10:13 01/15/17 (1)
- RE: Marantz PM 6006/7005 vs Yamaha S 501 - wjoehughes@gmail.com 20:27:16 01/22/17 (0)