Amp/Preamp Asylum Looking for a new Amp or Preamp? If you're after tubes, post over here. |
|
Hello, all,
As the heading says, has anybody around here moved from the NAD C320BEE (or any C32x) integrated to the 165/275BEE pre/amp separates. I've had my 320 for more than ten years now. Listening to it now with my Bowers and Wilkins 683 S2s as I type. It sounds terrific and absolutely nothing to complain about with this $400 amp.
But (there's always a "but" isn't there), I have a large room (28x26x11ft) and like to watch movies and listen to music at levels that occasionally go into the low to mid 90dbs. So, I'm looking for a bit more refinement and lots more power. Would like to have an ease to the music/presentation that big amps seem to deliver.
Am I on the right track? Anybody here running and happy with the 165/275BEE combination? Any thoughts would be appreciated. TIA
Cheers,
Scott
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - From NAD C320BEE to C165/C275BEE - samac 11:51:26 11/23/16 (45)
- RE: From NAD C320BEE to C165/C275BEE - Leopard2A6 15:22:11 12/05/16 (3)
- RE: From NAD C320BEE to C165/C275BEE - samac 17:22:54 12/05/16 (2)
- RE: From NAD C320BEE to C165/C275BEE - Leopard2A6 19:42:48 12/05/16 (1)
- RE: From NAD C320BEE to C165/C275BEE - samac 07:24:58 12/06/16 (0)
- RE: From NAD C320BEE to C165/C275BEE - KanedaK 01:37:00 12/01/16 (0)
- Mostly lateral move - Awe-d-o-file 10:31:39 11/25/16 (34)
- RE: Mostly lateral move - samac 18:27:54 11/25/16 (27)
- OK but - Awe-d-o-file 16:28:42 11/26/16 (21)
- RE: OK but - samac 16:51:35 11/26/16 (20)
- Definitely a lateral move - E-Stat 08:11:45 11/27/16 (18)
- RE: Definitely a lateral move - samac 10:56:05 11/27/16 (8)
- That's a nice choice - E-Stat 11:21:34 11/27/16 (7)
- RE: That's a nice choice - Awe-d-o-file 09:51:31 12/06/16 (0)
- RE: That's a nice choice - samac 15:31:33 11/27/16 (5)
- RE: That's a nice choice - bare 09:17:03 11/28/16 (4)
- RE: That's a nice choice - samac 15:43:08 11/28/16 (3)
- RE: That's a nice choice - airtime 17:27:41 11/28/16 (2)
- RE: That's a nice choice - samac 17:45:50 11/28/16 (1)
- Nice - airtime 06:34:47 11/29/16 (0)
- RE: Definitely a lateral move - airtime 08:32:51 11/27/16 (8)
- RE: Definitely a lateral move - samac 11:05:22 11/27/16 (0)
- And yet... - E-Stat 08:38:43 11/27/16 (6)
- To me having one system is strange - airtime 08:48:30 11/27/16 (5)
- That really isn't the question - E-Stat 10:17:16 11/27/16 (4)
- Ok E-Stat - airtime 06:39:20 11/29/16 (3)
- RE: Ok E-Stat - E-Stat 07:04:48 11/29/16 (2)
- RE: Ok E-Stat - airtime 07:32:33 11/29/16 (1)
- RE: Ok E-Stat - E-Stat 08:06:29 11/29/16 (0)
- RE: OK but - airtime 17:57:18 11/26/16 (0)
- New Schiit separates look interesting - G Squared 05:57:45 11/26/16 (4)
- RE: New Schiit separates look interesting - airtime 07:31:34 11/26/16 (2)
- RE: New Schiit separates look interesting - samac 16:17:52 11/26/16 (1)
- RE: New Schiit separates look interesting - airtime 16:38:43 11/26/16 (0)
- RE: New Schiit separates look interesting - samac 06:45:02 11/26/16 (0)
- No way that's a lateral move - airtime 11:04:45 11/25/16 (5)
- RE: No way that's a lateral move - Awe-d-o-file 16:32:33 11/26/16 (3)
- RE: No way that's a lateral move - samac 19:43:59 11/26/16 (1)
- RE: No way that's a lateral move - airtime 06:53:56 11/27/16 (0)
- Oh I DO agree with you on that - airtime 17:39:06 11/26/16 (0)
- RE: No way that's a lateral move - samac 18:29:16 11/25/16 (0)
- RE: From NAD C320BEE to C165/C275BEE - airtime 15:23:04 11/23/16 (4)
- RE: From NAD C320BEE to C165/C275BEE - samac 18:21:09 11/23/16 (3)
- RE: From NAD C320BEE to C165/C275BEE - airtime 06:44:05 11/24/16 (0)
- RE: From NAD C320BEE to C165/C275BEE - ABliss 06:38:18 11/24/16 (1)
- RE: From NAD C320BEE to C165/C275BEE - airtime 07:24:15 11/24/16 (0)