RE: I appreciate you input, particularly because

Posted by readargos (A) on August 18, 2014 at 13:45:18

In Reply to: RE: I appreciate you input, particularly because posted by morricab on August 17, 2014 at 12:30:18:

I agree BAT solid-state is a little dark. I haven't heard Threshold, NAT or Spinx Project. I believe Tim de Paravicini's EAR/Yoshino M100A was another solid-state design intended to sound tubelike, but another I've not heard. De Paravicini, like Victor Khomenko, gravitates toward tubes, but both designers claim they can get the sound they want from either topology.

Re: getting solid state to sound tubelike, I find fascinating an older article from Stereophile, "The Carver Challenge". You can do an internet search for carver challenge stereophile if the link doesn't post.

Thanks again for sharing your experience.

http://www.stereophile.com/content/carver-challenge (Open in New Window)

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - REVIEW: Musical Fidelity A308cr Amplifier (SS) - readargos 19:48:08 08/08/14 (18)

RE: REVIEW: Musical Fidelity A308cr Amplifier (SS) - morricab 08:08:19 08/10/14 (6)

RE: REVIEW: Musical Fidelity A308cr Amplifier (SS) - readargos 09:42:06 04/29/15 (0)

Tube and tube-hybrid gear I’ve auditioned - readargos 11:18:45 08/10/14 (4)

RE: Tube and tube-hybrid gear I’ve auditioned - morricab 03:28:34 08/16/14 (3)

I appreciate you input, particularly because - readargos 16:17:37 08/16/14 (2)

RE: I appreciate you input, particularly because - morricab 12:30:18 08/17/14 (1)

RE: I appreciate you input, particularly because - readargos 13:45:18 08/18/14 (0)

RE: REVIEW: Musical Fidelity A308cr Amplifier (SS) - fantja 08:31:45 08/09/14 (1)

Thanks! (n/t) - readargos 10:37:18 08/09/14 (0)

You put a lot of work into that - Metralla 08:19:24 08/09/14 (0)

RE: REVIEW: Musical Fidelity A308cr Amplifier (SS) - rick_m 07:21:58 08/09/14 (1)

Giving the A308cr its due - readargos 11:06:36 08/09/14 (0)

RE: very fine critique-- thanks for the contribution [n.t.a.] - wangmr 02:26:06 08/09/14 (4)

Thank you. (n/t) - readargos 11:23:53 08/09/14 (3)

RE: Thank you. (n/t) - Jack D II 12:16:54 08/09/14 (2)

Thanks for your feedback. - readargos 13:26:21 08/09/14 (1)

RE: Thanks for your feedback.Great dignified response [n.t.a.[ - wangmr 19:20:36 08/09/14 (0)

Forgot to include - readargos 20:09:24 08/08/14 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: I appreciate you input, particularly because - readargos 13:45:18 08/18/14 (0)

RE: I appreciate you input, particularly because

Post a Message!