Amp/Preamp Asylum Looking for a new Amp or Preamp? If you're after tubes, post over here. |
|
I vote for a Yes to that.
My reason is just from the veil lifting analogy. You start with 100 veils of cloth over the window, all equal, for example. Light gets through a bit but nothing can be seen through it. Taking one off only helps 1% at this stage.
Take 99 of them off, and one is left. You can see some shadows and light in an image now, much better. Take the final veil off, if you could, and you see through the glass window.
Or is every veil lifted something like only taking 1/2 step there every time? More logarithmic than linear?
My experience tells me that the closer I get to "near perfect", the crazier it gets trying to get a full balance and not overshoot the mark again.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Is upgrading near "the end" more important than at "the beginning" for a system? - commentary 04:22:11 07/29/12 (9)
- RE: Is upgrading near "the end" more important than at "the beginning" for a system? - telackey 13:21:07 08/01/12 (0)
- RE: Is upgrading near "the end" more important than at "the beginning" for a system? - rick_m 09:33:44 07/30/12 (2)
- RE: Is upgrading near "the end" more important than at "the beginning" for a system? - Mr Peabody 16:46:14 08/01/12 (1)
- RE: Is upgrading near "the end" more important than at "the beginning" for a system? - stanwal 17:57:59 09/02/12 (0)
- Logarithmic, IMO. nt - andyr 03:09:42 07/30/12 (1)
- Yep - KT88 10:18:18 07/30/12 (0)
- There are also the alternative possibilities... - mls-stl 06:15:59 07/29/12 (2)
- RE: There are also the alternative possibilities... - airtime 10:12:58 07/29/12 (1)
- "Upgrades are good are just a good way of saying you're bored and need a new toy"?? ... - andyr 03:08:38 07/30/12 (0)