Vinyl Asylum

Welcome Licorice Pizza (LP) lovers! Setup guides and Vinyl FAQ.

Return to Vinyl Asylum


Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded

Deutsche Gramophone LP records sound quality

108.26.190.141

Posted on February 18, 2017 at 18:36:40
Da He Hua
Audiophile

Posts: 115
Joined: December 13, 2016
Do people mostly collect DGG records for music and performance merits rather than sound quality? I have a fairly large collection of DGG, spanning from early tulips to digital in the 1980's. But I have never been impressed by their sonic virtues. They are not necessarily bad, but generally are just mediocre compared to other leading labels. Occasionally one gets something like Bernstein's recording of the complete opera Carmen, which sounds fantastic, but from a sonic perspective, it is so uncharacteristic of DGG. It seems odd that the recording engineers in Hanover were just way behind those at Decca, EMI, or RCA and Mercury. Did they just not care much about sonic qualities but focus more on music instead? But I thought people like Karajan cared a lot about sound, and he had DGG record most of his recordings for decades! But his better-sounding recordings are typically from Decca and some from EMI.

 

Hide full thread outline!
    ...
They were top German engineers who used...., posted on February 18, 2017 at 18:39:04
vinyl1
Audiophile

Posts: 3948
Joined: October 3, 2001
...the latest, most complex equipment. Think of dozens of microphones feeding into huge mixers with lots of knobs and dials. Karajan loved them - the more knobs and dials the better! That was the problem.

 

RE: Deutsche Gramophone LP records sound quality, posted on February 18, 2017 at 19:07:42
banpuku
Audiophile

Posts: 1008
Joined: January 19, 2006
I concur with your observation. Most of my DG lips are modest with regards to sonic quality. Most of the LPs have a thin sound to them. Also, many have reverse polarity and can sound better by reversing the polarity on your speakers which is a huge PIA. SurFace noise is usually very good, but the tonal balance is forward in the upper Midwest and treble region.

 

RE: Deutsche Gramophone LP records sound quality, posted on February 18, 2017 at 19:38:00
spindoctor
Audiophile

Posts: 1661
Location: Virginia
Joined: December 31, 2002
My experience parallels yours. Sonically DG does not perform well in my system and I avoid them unless there's a specific performance/artist that In want to hear. My experience of Philips is the exact opposite with great recordings and performances. Of course, the early Telarcs remain unequaled IMHO.

Sim

Sim

 

RE: Deutsche Gramophone LP records sound quality, posted on February 18, 2017 at 22:13:38
rotarius
Audiophile

Posts: 30
Location: East Lansing
Joined: May 19, 2006
I have quite a few DG recordings that sound great. Most of them are with conductors other than Karajan. For example, Bohm's Eroica with BPO & Okko Kamu's Sibelius Sym. No.2. I do agree a lot of DG recordings lack warmth or are bass shy.

 

RE: Deutsche Gramophone LP records sound quality, posted on February 18, 2017 at 22:56:19
Stale
Audiophile

Posts: 3263
Location: So. California
Joined: August 3, 2001
Agree with banpuku. Copies I have/had sound thin, mostly.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane."

 

RE: Deutsche Gramophone LP records sound quality, posted on February 18, 2017 at 23:13:49
flood2
Audiophile

Posts: 2558
Joined: January 11, 2011
As a musician, to me performance comes first and foremost. I personally haven't noticed any particular "trend" in the sound balance. There are badly balanced recordings from all companies. Decca (under Culshaw) certainly did have very excellent recordings and the sound balance certainly depends on the producer. Do you have Richter playing Beethoven Piano Concerto Nr 3 (138 848)? I definitely wouldn't have thought it sounde thin at all!
Vinyl replay being analogue will be coloured by your turntable, cartridge, alignment accuracy (including SRA), phono stage, speakers and amp, so at the end of the day, if the DG records don't sound the way you expect them to compared to a different company, it doesn't necessarily mean that DG records are flawed unless you were present at the recording session and sat with the mastering engineer during mixdown. You are listening to what the tonmeister is trying to achieve in the sound balance as well as non-linearities in the monitoring equipment. If there is a sufficient mismatch between your playback equipment then they will doubtless sound "off". They don't on my system "in general".
Regards Anthony

"Beauty is Truth, Truth Beauty.." Keats

 

Agree..., posted on February 18, 2017 at 23:35:36
mr.bear
Audiophile

Posts: 4167
Joined: November 13, 2001
I think the word is "over-mic'ed" -- the sound is very clean and detailed but there is zero ambient information giving the impression of the instruments performing in number of acoustically-isolated chambers. Little of wht the golden-ears call "air." I have a rather large reverberant room and a fairly energetic system and, though DG never sound *bad* per se, I tend to avoid them. They do however encompass some of the world's greatest conductors and outstanding orchestral performances so they're hard to avoid.

 

RE: Deutsche Gramophone LP records sound quality, posted on February 19, 2017 at 02:47:06
Depends on the transfer.

(Very) early 'Tulips' with 'LAB' in the deadwax can be remarkably fine (ie: 1958 Schubert Lieder/Seefried SLPM 136009; as did a 1959 Bartok Bluebeard SLPM 138030 transfer) but, through the 60's, they can sound (very) inferior indeed due to damped dynamics + limited HF giving an added sense of 'distortion'.

Some early '80's can sound filtered compared to a mid-'70's of the same, whilst a digital remaster can sound excellent (Mozart 4 Horn C/Karajan); so there's really little consistency...and a label only really lusted-after by oriental fetishists/asset strippers (Mravinsky/Schneiderhan/Fournier..et al).

 

Polarity really matters with DGs, posted on February 19, 2017 at 05:12:47
Dave Pogue
Audiophile

Posts: 11689
Location: DC Area
Joined: October 9, 2001
Like many here, I thought my DG records and tapes (especially the open reel tapes) sounded very ... ordinary. Or worse. Then I got speakers that were polarity-coherent (all drivers wired the same way, minimal or no crossover) and an Aesthetix Calypso linestage with polarity (phase) switching on the remote. Big difference.

All of my DGs were recorded in inverted polarity. More than just about any other label I have, they responded to the polarity switch by opening up the sound and giving it a general "rightness." I agree that changing polarity by switching speaker cables is a royal PIA but almost worth it in the case of DGs. IF (big if) your speakers reveal polarity changes in the first place. Most won't, including my current speakers.

 

RE: Deutsche Gramophone LP records sound quality, posted on February 19, 2017 at 05:50:03
For me, DG did some of the best-sounding classical LPs ever. However, I have to agree with the poster who criticized Karajan's recordings, especially the later ones, as over produced. Also, the Philharmonie (built in 1963) does not seem to be the best recording venue imho. Karajan's most praised Beethoven cycle is the first one, and only one completed before the Philharmonie opened.

Try the DG Boston Symphony Chamber Players LPs, for example. Also, David Atherton's Kurt Weill LP with the London Sinfonietta. Those are considered "audiophile" by some pundits. Or some of the Bohm / Vienna Philharmonic LPs. Or the Amadeus String Quartet.

 

RE: Deutsche Gramophone LP records sound quality, posted on February 19, 2017 at 07:42:06
throwback
Audiophile

Posts: 762
Location: Colorado
Joined: December 8, 2003
DGs are not my favorites either. But one is: the Giuliani Mahler 9th. It's big, bold and has plenty of powerful bass. Plus, Giulini captures its heart. This is one I play a LOT!

 

RE: Deutsche Gramophone LP records sound quality, posted on February 19, 2017 at 08:43:04
ecl876
Audiophile

Posts: 3415
Location: Bend, Oregon
Joined: January 14, 2007
Contributor
  Since:
January 28, 2012
This is one of my best sounding DGs.

 

RE: Deutsche Gramophone LP records sound quality, posted on February 19, 2017 at 08:45:28
Travis
Audiophile

Posts: 6170
Location: La Grange, Texas
Joined: November 25, 2001
For over fifty years I have tried to really like DGG sound reproduction. Not much luck and generally I buy for the specific artist.


"David Atherton's Kurt Weill LP with the London Sinfonietta. Those are considered "audiophile" by some pundits."





Yes, the Atherton is good but the Nonesuch LP is much better, IMHO. The CD of the Nonesuch lacks bass, of all things. On second thought, maybe I should try to find the Atherton on LP.




"If people don't want to come, nothing will stop them" - Sol Hurok

 

RE: Deutsche Gramophone LP records sound quality, posted on February 19, 2017 at 11:58:03
Crazy Dave
Audiophile

Posts: 14371
Location: East Coast
Joined: October 4, 2001
I don't find any of them unlistenable, but I like the sound of my Tulips, of which I have quite a few. I have some digital albums that sound good to me too. Maybe I am easily satisfied! My current preamp has tone controls, which did make quite a difference in my ability to enjoy less than perfect recordings.

Dave

 

No argument here. I love the Weisberg ensemble's Nonesuch LPs.nt, posted on February 19, 2017 at 12:06:47

 

multimiking does not work out, posted on February 19, 2017 at 12:16:50
richardl
Audiophile

Posts: 3555
Joined: September 5, 2002
It gives a certain sound but, it does not remind you of the symphony at all. I go 8 times a year to the symphony and have for 15 years or more. DG has great artists sort of( Am I the only one sick of the Karajan symphonies? I actually tossed a Beethoven DG CD across the room the other day it was so awful.) and that is what they are famous for IMO. Abbado, Argerich, Pollini, etc. and plenty of Opera stars as well(not my thing so cannot name them easily). Richard

 

RE: Deutsche Gramophone LP records sound quality, posted on February 19, 2017 at 12:17:05
Beerman
Audiophile

Posts: 26
Joined: November 8, 2001
My experience suggests the following three sub groups exist:

1. Red Stereo Tag on Cover, Tulips and "Alle Hersteller" on label
Usually excellent sound, usually reverse polarity.
2. No red tag. Tulips and either "Made in Germany" or "Alle Hersteller"on label
May or may not be reverse polarity. Often poor sound either way.
3. No tulips.
Always poor sound regardless of polarity.

As mentioned below, the poor sounding ones are thin, bass shy, and lack soundstage.
Not my favorite label, but the red tags can be special. The Alle Hersteller monos can be very good also.



 

Agreed, posted on February 19, 2017 at 12:39:08
M3 lover
Audiophile

Posts: 6601
Location: SW Mich
Joined: May 29, 2005
Contributor
  Since:
July 4, 2007
The Nonesuch has been a reference for natural instrumental tonalities for me for a few decades.

I've not heard the Atherton/DG but considered the Nonesuch even better that the Reference Recording version which I did hear.

"The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing, if you can fake that you've got it made." Groucho

 

RE: Agreed, posted on February 19, 2017 at 12:49:29
Travis
Audiophile

Posts: 6170
Location: La Grange, Texas
Joined: November 25, 2001
Thanks.

I only ever heard OF the Reference LP.




"If people don't want to come, nothing will stop them" - Sol Hurok

 

RE: Agreed, posted on February 19, 2017 at 13:03:00
Mel
Audiophile

Posts: 2993
Location: New York City Area
Joined: February 21, 2001
I think the Reference Recording SQ is better, significantly better. It's hard to say that for the Nonesuch is very, very good. The Reference performance, though, is stiff and almost too perfect. The Nonesuch is freer and sounds more extemporaneous, like a great pit orchestra.

 

RE: Deutsche Gramophone LP records sound quality, posted on February 19, 2017 at 13:06:57
SgreenP@MSN.com
Audiophile

Posts: 3537
Joined: April 23, 2007
Right you are....the Bernstein Carmen is WONDERFUL....the but many DG's are not.

 

RE: Agreed, posted on February 19, 2017 at 13:16:48
M3 lover
Audiophile

Posts: 6601
Location: SW Mich
Joined: May 29, 2005
Contributor
  Since:
July 4, 2007
about the "stiffness" in the Chicago RR as I remember it. At least some of my reaction is likely simply enjoying the performances much more on the Nonesuch.

A friend who was a musician had the RR and that's where I heard it. After he heard my Nonesuch version he ask for my help in finding an LP copy as it was out of print by that time.

"The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing, if you can fake that you've got it made." Groucho

 

RE: Exactly. It seems people occasionally need to be reminded about this. nt, posted on February 19, 2017 at 15:48:13
thegage
Audiophile

Posts: 1157
Location: Western Mass.
Joined: April 29, 2000

 

RE: Polarity really matters with DGs, posted on February 19, 2017 at 16:34:58
SgreenP@MSN.com
Audiophile

Posts: 3537
Joined: April 23, 2007
Very interesting Dave.....I'll try it and listen. Thanks

 

RE: Deutsche Gramophone LP records sound quality, posted on February 19, 2017 at 19:59:34
robertkeir
Audiophile

Posts: 185
Joined: November 28, 2005
Not only great sound but great performances of both the 4th and the 5th. Back in the '70's, I belonged to a record of the month club. I think it was called "The International Preview Society". One of their selections was this record but they sent out an Italian pressing. Even the Italian pressing was excellent. I later sought out and acquired a "Tulips" version. All in all, a wonderful record

 

RE: multimiking does not work out, posted on February 20, 2017 at 12:59:20
zacster
Audiophile

Posts: 2179
Location: NYC
Joined: November 22, 2003
Almost half of my classical collection is on DGG, and I listen to almost none of it. When my system wasn't very revealing, it sounded good, but as I bought better gear, they started sounding worse. They were all close mic'ed and the instruments were just all over the place, never in spatial relation to each other. My Spica TC-50s would create an image and disappear with most music, except there was no image to create with DGG.

The early CDs were even worse. Violins just screeched, like nails on a blackboard. This is not an exaggeration. As an early adopter of CD, I was always talking up the merits of the format. But my few Karajan CD even I couldn't stand. (And it turns out the rest of what I bought in that first year is really bad too.)

 

Don't really agree., posted on February 21, 2017 at 23:18:55
B.K.
Audiophile

Posts: 1092
Location: California
Joined: February 18, 2007
Contributor
  Since:
March 12, 2007
My DG records are generally of very good recording quality. Of course there are exceptions; but, say, compared to EMI over the same period, I would say that DG is generally more consistent.

Best regards,

 

RE: Deutsche Gramophone LP records sound quality, posted on February 23, 2017 at 08:45:22
dadbar
Audiophile

Posts: 1675
Location: Portland OR
Joined: June 29, 2003
Contributor
  Since:
March 25, 2006
I collect them because the thin sound quality on a lot of the pressings reminds me of listening to classical music on WQXR (kabong) on our Telefunken Caprice table radio. It's a very subjective thing.

The truth is that I collect them because I enjoy the cheezy paper thin jackets with incomprehensible German liner notes that I can't read.

There are some performances though, that are my gold standard- like Karajan's Beethoven #5 and Eugen Jochem's Haydn Military Symphony....

 

RE: Deutsche Gramophone LP records sound quality, posted on February 26, 2017 at 01:07:15
Heifetz
Audiophile

Posts: 245
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Joined: April 3, 2013
Hi,
Yes, I agree with many of the slightly negative issues with DGG. Usually I buy them for the artists performances.
eg Amadeus String Q playing Beethoven String Quartets on the 1st Ed Red Labels. The sound stage is not balanced and no where as big or sonically good as the Decca issues of The Weller SQ playing Beethoven.
Bob
"You have to leave something to your imagination"

 

RE: Deutsche Gramophone LP records sound quality, posted on February 26, 2017 at 08:28:14
jubal62
Audiophile

Posts: 93
Joined: December 9, 2012
Never liked their sound quality. Their groove level modulation is very low so noise level seems higher than most.

 

RE: Deutsche Gramophone LP records sound quality, posted on February 26, 2017 at 16:00:22
flood2
Audiophile

Posts: 2558
Joined: January 11, 2011
That would be down to the cutting engineer rather than the producer or tonmeister. The low groove amplitude is of course much more demanding of vinyl formulation and pressing quality, but on the whole I have not found the "quiet cuts" to be a problem as far as rumble or vinyl swoosh is concerned (they are not audible in my system except perhaps during totally silent periods where the musicians are totally silent) Apart from the odd tick or pop, mine are generally very good.
The low amplitude cuts would be a conscious choice partly to extend the life of the cutting head (reduced heat dissipation) but mainly to reducing the cutting and replay distortions associated with a high amplitude cut. There is of course the obvious advantage of a longer playing time on a side (up to 35 minutes or so) in relation to the available real estate for the groove envelope, but the vast majority of sides are much shorter and this allows for the innermost groove to be kept as far out as possible so the distortion due to horizontal tracking error is minimised. The last advantage is wider bandwidth (which will be related to my earlier point about heat dissipation in the cutting head and life expectancy).
Different engineers will make different compromises of course, but I don't believe that my DG records are any different to Philips or Chandos or Hyperion. All my classical records tend to be very quiet!
Regards Anthony

"Beauty is Truth, Truth Beauty.." Keats

 

Page processed in 0.059 seconds.