Vinyl Asylum

Welcome Licorice Pizza (LP) lovers! Setup guides and Vinyl FAQ.

Return to Vinyl Asylum


Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded

Talisman S a good fit to Audio Technica AT1009 arm?

75.66.136.72

Posted on July 29, 2014 at 21:02:20
Ciscokid
Audiophile

Posts: 310
Location: Memphis
Joined: April 18, 2003
Hi,
I've been offered a Sumiko Talisman S LOMC cartridge by a friend at work. Unknown hours, but he has offered me to take home and give it a try. Anyhow, just wondering if that cartridge would be a good fit compliance wise to my AT1009 arm? I've looked up the info on vinylengine, but those numbers don't really make since to me.

I am currently running a Denon DL103 and a SUT.

Any help would be most appreciated.

Regards,
Danny

 

Hide full thread outline!
    ...
RE: Talisman S a good fit to Audio Technica AT1009 arm?, posted on July 29, 2014 at 21:37:37
John Elison
Audiophile

Posts: 23900
Location: Central Kentucky
Joined: December 20, 2000
Contributor
  Since:
January 29, 2004
Here is the arm/cartridge resonance frequency equation:



If you can provide all the numbers, I can calculate the arm/cartridge resonance frequency for you. It is generally considered to be a good match if the arm/cartridge resonance frequency falls within the range of 8-Hz to 13-Hz. For more accurate results it is best to use a test record to measure the resonance frequency.

Best regards,
John Elison

 

RE: Talisman S a good fit to Audio Technica AT1009 arm?, posted on July 30, 2014 at 05:08:18
Curious
Dealer

Posts: 5878
Joined: April 28, 2010
I don't think so. A new Talisman S is a good fit for low to medium mass arms. Your At is described as a high mass arm, and it certainly looks like one. Considering the age of the cartridge and its potential to bottom out due to its older suspension being stressed, it's not a combo I'd recommend. You've got a good arm and lots of choices. Would you prefer to use an older cartridge?
"Hope is a good thing. Maybe, the best of things. And no good thing ever dies."

 

Looks like a good D-103 variant cartridge option. /nt\, posted on July 30, 2014 at 07:49:26
Opus 33 1/3
Audiophile

Posts: 4184
Location: D.C. Area
Joined: February 19, 2014





Opus 33 1/3

 

Vinylengine's "Cartridge Resonance Evaluator"..., posted on July 30, 2014 at 08:29:37
audio39
Audiophile

Posts: 669
Joined: July 15, 2003
suggests a resonant frequency of 8hz.

 

He's currently using the DL-103, posted on July 30, 2014 at 09:15:59
Curious
Dealer

Posts: 5878
Joined: April 28, 2010
If I had his set-up, I'd seriously consider the Ortofon Royal N.
"Hope is a good thing. Maybe, the best of things. And no good thing ever dies."

 

I'd consider the $350 SoundSmith retip on the 103. /nt\, posted on July 30, 2014 at 09:25:30
Opus 33 1/3
Audiophile

Posts: 4184
Location: D.C. Area
Joined: February 19, 2014







Opus 33 1/3

 

Or the $150 PhonoCartidgeRetipping.com retip on the DL-103. (nt), posted on July 30, 2014 at 09:59:51
audio39
Audiophile

Posts: 669
Joined: July 15, 2003
nt

 

I always found it to sound ..., posted on July 30, 2014 at 17:10:16
reelsmith.
Audiophile

Posts: 13131
Location: CT
Joined: June 7, 2005
Contributor
  Since:
January 19, 2010
...bright and thin.

My guess is you'll prefer your 103 ...but I'll be happy to have been wrong.

Dean.




reelsmith's axiom: Its going to be used equipment when I sell it, so it may as well be used equipment when I buy it.


 

RE: Talisman S a good fit to Audio Technica AT1009 arm?, posted on July 30, 2014 at 21:08:42
Ciscokid
Audiophile

Posts: 310
Location: Memphis
Joined: April 18, 2003
Sorry guys to have just gotten back into this thread. But all have provided very good info and I do appreciate it... I'm leaning towards not getting the cart and keeping what I have for now. Mostly due to some the things pointed out about age, mass of arm and so forth.

Many thanks..

Regards,
Danny

 

Page processed in 0.023 seconds.