Vintage Asylum

Classic gear from yesteryear; vintage audio standing the test of time.

Return to Vintage Asylum


Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded

Dynaco MKIV

64.24.74.34

Posted on March 27, 2001 at 17:25:44
blakey


 
A friend is offering me a Dynaco MKIV pair in a mint condition for $600 and I am in need your opinions. They haven't been moded much-except for the capacitors. Do they sound as good as ST70 or MKIII's?

Any inputs would be appreciated.

blakey

 

Hide full thread outline!
    ...
Re: Dynaco MKIV, posted on March 27, 2001 at 19:06:08
JonM


 
The Mk IV is the same circuit as the ST-70, just with the whole power supply from the ST-70 dedicated to one channel. So you basically get the sonics of the ST-70 with a little more power.

I have two ST-70s, two Mk IV's and three Mk III's (don't ask - my closet is full of this stuff!). Among my particular units, one ST-70 is sweet and lovely, one is a little grey and dry. The Mk IV's are in between the two ST-70's (smooth but they don't sparkle in the highs like that one ST-70), and the Mk III's are the greyest sounding of the bunch. (Sorry - I don't know a better term to use. Flat, grey, boring.) But I think it depends as much on the particular unit as anything - the condition of the tubes and surrounding circuitry after however many years of baking they've been through.

They are nice amps, but $600 seems like a lot to me. You need to listen to them in your system to decide if they are worth it to you.

 

Re: Dynaco MKIV, posted on March 27, 2001 at 21:25:16
TAZSMONN


 
$600 is to high !

I redid power supply and coupling caps and changed it to triode mode, it sounds nice.



Tazsmonn "The cat herder"
South Minneapolis,MN, USA, Earth
Check out where I got my system at


http://www.sasaudiolabs.com/

 

Re: Dynaco MKIV, posted on March 27, 2001 at 23:41:06
You said one ST-70 sounded "sweet" and the other sounded "dry." Had you tried swapping tubes in the amps? If you did, did the sound travel with the tubes or stay with the amps? Are the components on the driver boards identical or different? Thanks!

I've experienced similar variations in old tube gear. I'm trying to pinpoint what could account for these differences. (I've never heard a Mk. III that sounded good.)

 

Probably is the tubes, posted on March 28, 2001 at 08:24:37
JonM


 
You know, I never bothered to try swapping the tubes, but that's a good guess. The "sweet" one has EL-34's I got from Groove Tubes, ones they specifically recommended for hi fi amps (instead of instrument amps). Really nice!! The "dry" sounding one had whatever tubes were in it from the used shop where I bought it.

That's why it's so hard to characterize the sound of these amps - so much depends on factors that pertain to a specific unit (tubes, how caps and resistors have aged, etc.).

 

Re: Dynaco MKIV, posted on March 29, 2001 at 13:03:41
Ross


 
$600 is on the high side. (Which caps were changed- PS or Coupling?) Though with NM ST-70s going for $500 on Ebay, $600 may be correct for NM with original Mullards.

Mk-4 does sound slightly different than the ST-70. Deeper tighter bass is the main difference because of the more robust powersupply vs one side of the ST-70. The MK-4 is rarer than the ST-70 an in my experience has always comanded a bit of a price premium as a result.

To my ears, both the ST-70 and MK-4 sound better than the MK-3.

 

Price would also depend on the tubes offered, posted on March 30, 2001 at 06:33:55
koo


 
What happened to your Fisher 80AZ amp? Was it restored?

 

Re: Price would also depend on the tubes offered, posted on April 2, 2001 at 15:08:50
blakey


 
Koo,

I am currently having my 70AZ's restored and will let you know as soon as I get them back.

In the mean time, a friend of mine is offering me a mint pair of MKIV's for $600. I am still not sure I should jump on it or not, as, like people who responded to my post have said, the price seems to be on a higher side. I think they have Tesla EL34's. Appreciate your input.

blakey

 

Page processed in 0.020 seconds.