Classic gear from yesteryear; vintage audio standing the test of time.
Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded
old vs new sound`
63.142.209.123 |
||
Posted on April 14, 2016 at 12:44:44 | ||
Posts: 634
Location: central wa Joined: September 27, 2012 |
Both my friend and I like good music. But we have different approaches. He has a new system (I think Polk TI9 speakers and Emovita amps and a newer B&W subwoofer) and I have an older system (ADS L710 speakers and an HK 7000 receiver and an Atlantic Tech 172 PBM subwoofer). Both systems are smooth and accurate, but to me his system sounds "sterile and fatiguing, while mine seems musical, non fatiguing and has some character." Do you guys like the "old" sound better too? Or am I missing something? |
Too many variables, posted on April 14, 2016 at 13:38:38 | |
Posts: 37663
Joined: May 12, 2000 Contributor Since: April 5, 2002 |
as was previously mentioned. The Emo gear is a bit lean sounding and the analog section of a CDP can make a marked difference as well. I find some op amp based preamps and source components fatiguing, too. Did you mean Polk RTi9 speakers? I've compared my New Advents to smaller Polk LSi9 standmounts and find the Advents less neutral through the lower midrange. I used to sell the ADS line and know the 710 well. I had LV1020s for a while myself. They are a touch boxy sounding in that range which is pretty much absent with modern speakers. |
you are correct, posted on April 14, 2016 at 21:04:34 | |
Posts: 634
Location: central wa Joined: September 27, 2012 |
? |
RE: old vs new sound`, posted on April 24, 2016 at 14:57:14 | |
Posts: 588
Joined: October 21, 2015 |
You were right the first time! |