Tube DIY Asylum

Do It Yourself (DIY) paradise for tube and SET project builders.

Return to Tube DIY Asylum


Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded

Initial Report, Film Cap 180 degree orientation - Employing new-style Clip Leads

71.50.22.38

Posted on August 18, 2016 at 08:24:26
drlowmu
Manufacturer

Posts: 9730
Location: East of Kansas City
Joined: January 10, 2005
First

I want to thank "Alpha Al " for suggesting the Mueller 60C all copper alligator clips. In conjunction with the Mil Spec wire, they were somewhat better sounding than "stock" alligator clips on the ends. The 60Cs allowed me to make better subjective decisions, easier. Way to go, Al !!

As of Wednesday, 8-16-16, I have had the time to evaluate all four main caps associated with my amp's B+ supply, and also the two main Rk caps that bypass my Type 45 tubes' cathode resistor. Six film caps in total - so far.

Out of these six film caps, ( I went back and forth listening very carefully, on each of the six film caps,) I discovered that 5 out of the 6 in my SET were installed 180 degrees wrong. That is some percentage !!! 83.33% backwards. WOW.

( Also helpful, using clip leads ) I find that with LSES ( Low Stored Energy Supply ) B+ filtering, the AMOUNT of WIRE in the B+ ( and ground ) systems plays a large roll in the SET's ultimate performance. I USED the newly made " good " clip leads to add wire, between each wired span of the power supply, and LISTENED to the effect, to find the OPTIMAL amount.

Speakers over 100 dB ( ALTEC, JBL, ALE ) are the needed tools for doing audio design by ear. In most cases, I added MORE wire than what was originally there. IF you add too much wire, you LOSE high end, and the music's pace and timing, so - one must trade-off intelligently.

The WIRE exercise was worth the time and effort.

I am HESITANT, its premature, to FULLY discuss what I heard, because the front end of this SET amp now " begs" to be both wire and cap optimized, as I just did to the supply and Type 45 Finals' Rks. When I finish this, I will know better what the overall result will sound like, and if I made any mistakes. So far, me thinks, so good.

One thing I am willing to bet, 99.99% of the people listening to SET amps, Push-Pull tube amps, etc., have NO CLUE as to if ALL their expensive, fancy smancy film caps, are installed in their optimal 180 degree position !! No one ( I know of ) has listened to EACH film cap, both positions, on well-wired / optimized high efficiency speakers.

For the record, in my DIY passive speaker crossovers ( ALTEC VOTT A7-800s ), the film caps - are ALL 180 degree optimized, eight film caps...YES !!

Get to it Dudes,....new audio playback pleasures might possibly await you !!

Have fun.

Jeff Medwin

PS, An old LA, CA friend, Enid Lumley would have really liked this !! She was "something else " !

 

Hide full thread outline!
    ...
RE: Initial Report, Film Cap 180 degree orientation - Employing new-style Clip Leads, posted on August 18, 2016 at 09:11:31
hennfarm
Audiophile

Posts: 535
Location: Oregon
Joined: October 8, 2008
pretentiousnes, Jeff. Pretentiousness

 

RE: Initial Report, Film Cap 180 degree orientation - Employing new-style Clip Leads, posted on August 18, 2016 at 10:54:08
Lew
Audiophile

Posts: 10912
Location: Bethesda, Maryland
Joined: December 11, 2000
Because you don't relate your subjective findings to any identifiable physical characteristic of the capacitor (like the location of the lead connected to the outer foil, for example), your conclusions don't help anyone else, unless you can lend out your ears. Furthermore, at this level of fussiness, wouldn't you have to take into account the influence of the clip leads? Maybe they have "polarity" too. So, for each test, you have to test direction of each clip lead (4 conditions) in addition to the direction of the capacitor itself (2 conditions), for a total of 8 different conditions that need to be tested. I'm just sayin'

 

RE: Initial Report, Film Cap 180 degree orientation - Employing new-style Clip Leads, posted on August 18, 2016 at 12:40:47
drlowmu
Manufacturer

Posts: 9730
Location: East of Kansas City
Joined: January 10, 2005
How the film cap is wound does not GUARANTEE what will sound best in the circuit. Sorry doc, there is no " route " way to obtain what I seek, other than DOING and LISTENING. That is a point of my post. No free lunch. Do the work and enjoy.

Clip leads are a big degrade, the Mil Spec wire, and Mueller 60C alligators help a little, but I am very aware of the clip lead effects.

Jeff Medwin

 

RE: Initial Report, Film Cap 180 degree orientation - Employing new-style Clip Leads, posted on August 18, 2016 at 12:49:57
drlowmu
Manufacturer

Posts: 9730
Location: East of Kansas City
Joined: January 10, 2005
pre·ten·tious
prəˈten(t)SHəs/
adjective
attempting to impress by affecting greater importance, talent, culture, etc., than is actually possessed.
"a pretentious literary device"
synonyms: affected, ostentatious, showy;


Hennfarm,

I am very sorry, when I posted that, that was the furthest thing from my mind. I did not seek to make a bad impression. 'Au contraire. So sorry.

I am pointing out something that was wrong 83 % in my build, so far, and I was showing others how to improve their own audio gear.

Also, this is something I never personally have seen addressed in a comprehensive manner.

The intent was to allow others, if so inclined, and encourage them to optimize their own systems

Designing BY EAR is a great way to go about things, assuming you have high efficiency speakers, which makes it easy to hear these things.

Jeff Medwin

 

RE: Initial Report, Film Cap 180 degree orientation - Employing new-style Clip Leads, posted on August 18, 2016 at 15:12:57
91derlust
Audiophile

Posts: 1101
Joined: December 25, 2014
Jeff, I know that is most likely your intention. Communication would be clearer if you refrained from using inflammatory language: "...have NO CLUE as to if ALL their expensive, fancy smancy film caps"

I got from your post that were excited and that you heard a difference in cap orientation when using a decent, in situ test rig... and that the resulting changes have made for an amp more to your personal liking.

Cheers,
91


"Confusion of goals and perfection of means seems to characterise our age." Albert Einstein

 

RE: Initial Report, Film Cap 180 degree orientation - Employing new-style Clip Leads, posted on August 19, 2016 at 09:40:01
drlowmu
Manufacturer

Posts: 9730
Location: East of Kansas City
Joined: January 10, 2005
Thank you, you got it !! No ones ever done a whole amp, to my knowledge, and posted about it on this Forum, for others to learn from.

I can't wait to do ( and hear ) the front-end B+ supply and driver stage Rk bypass caps next, C3 left, C3 right, driver Rks, left and right.

It is possible that " what I was missing " ( with non-optimal film cap orientation ) I was trying to make-up-for to my ears with wild amounts of bypassing, multiple bypassing. That " wild bypassing " of mine, may have been an error.

It will be instructive to me to hear the whole amp, film caps orientated, with all the wild bypassing gone, and then see if I only need conservative bypassing. Won't know till I orientate-optimize this amp's remaining front-end caps.

Also, I have been using a cheapo VISHAY 4 uF DC LINK cap for my driver stages' " Final Filter main cap ", and I know from my prior crossover experiments how much better a Dynami 4.0 E cap will be. So, I am also excited to eventually hear the Dynami 4.0 E feeding my driver stage's plate resistors. Me thinks that cap is mandatory for the performance I seek. Such a shame, the Dynami Cap 4.0 E went from $32 to $66 recently, but I'm told by Dennis Fraker ( Serious Stereo ) it may be worth $200+, relative to other 4.0 uF caps.

YES, I wanna HEAR all of this. Need to have a killer amp for my retirement years. This VOTT - as optimized, will likely be my last set of speakers, just need a really good amp, the weak link.

Jeff

 

100db speakers - like your A7 VOTTs?! You can't be serious., posted on August 19, 2016 at 20:24:15
Timbo in Oz
Audiophile

Posts: 23221
Location: Canberra - in the ACT - SE Australia
Joined: January 30, 2002
The only kind of speaker I'd be bothered to use - for hearing small changes at this level of 'experimenting' - is one with close to perfect impulse response. Sensitivity isn't an issue or a help here. Not at all.

Speed and waveform integrity does, which are orthogonal with timing. Minimally (distantly) miked music with as few mikes in coincident / other 'stereo' arrays, would also be essential.

After all, science has taught us that we get most information about music - the affective information, with an a Geoff, like you tell us you care about, from the starting transient of all acoustic instrument's notes.

Timbre, expression / intent, timing and interplay.

VOTT A7s were good speakers in their day, but yours still have most of their flaws. Poor FR, poor / inconsistent directivity, and early onset overload of the main driver, due to excursion problems.

{;-)!!!!!!!!

Confirmation bias, run riot.


Warmest

Tim Bailey

Skeptical Measurer & Audio Scrounger


 

"How the film cap is wound does not GUARANTEE what will sound best in the circuit." , posted on August 20, 2016 at 14:29:39
Lew
Audiophile

Posts: 10912
Location: Bethesda, Maryland
Joined: December 11, 2000
That would be useful information, if that's what you found, but I thought you wrote earlier that you were not checking the capacitors for the location of the lead connected to the outer foil (which I found out anyway was a frustrating task for 10uF and higher value film capacitors). Anyway, since you have not correlated your findings with anything except subjective judgement, how can you make this latest claim? (Not that I object to the idea of doing it by ear per se.)

 

RE: Initial Report, Film Cap 180 degree orientation - Employing new-style Clip Leads, posted on August 21, 2016 at 01:03:15
91derlust
Audiophile

Posts: 1101
Joined: December 25, 2014
It is possible that 5/6 were randomly the "wrong" way round, but not probable. That high a proportion suggests that there may be some other factor unaccounted for.

Could capacitor sound "deteriorate" due to current passing through in a certain direction over time? Is this part of what we hear with "break-in" - a smoothing of sonic presentation? You have not stated what the improvement with reorientation was so I won't extrapolate further.

Maybe in a few months' time you could re-test both orientations and let us know whether the the ideal orientation holds. If the caps need to be re-oriented, perhaps you could then test at ever-decreasing intervals until you have identified the ideal re-orientation time-period, for the caps you use, in your circuit. I wonder if all the caps are the same or would require different reorientation periods.

The mind boggles.

Cheers,
91.

"Confusion of goals and perfection of means seems to characterise our age." Albert Einstein

 

RE: "How the film cap is wound does not GUARANTEE what will sound best in the circuit." , posted on August 21, 2016 at 07:02:46
drlowmu
Manufacturer

Posts: 9730
Location: East of Kansas City
Joined: January 10, 2005
Lew,

I MAY, in the future, go and gain SOLID experience measuring for the outer foil. Afterwards - I might disassemble the leads from this amp, and test for outer foil correlations. But if I did all this work, it would be so that I can build a second amp easier ( thinking JJ2A3 DC SET, stereo ).

I am not so sure I would give the information to others, who have done LITTLE or NO work at all. That would depend upon my intent, to be 100% amateur, or sell an item or two, every now and than. I don't know the answer to that.

I should measure the already - optimized Custom ALTEC crossovers' orientations too, may be easy to do, its a large unit, easy to parts-access.

BUT, I have forged a path here for others so inclined, a guy, say, like Nickel Core !! Others, using 100dB or higher speakers, can do this work, and document foil orientations, as we have discussed herein. If they ( or you ) wanna give out your findings, that is up to them.

Its sorta COOL when you do film cap orientations unprejudiced, 100% by ear. But its sorta smart IF you were to test for outer foil first, and NOT let that testing prejudice your listening determinations.

Lew. The adding of " more wire " within spans of this DC amp was a BIG thing, in terms of fleshing-out the music, and getting maximum dynamic contrasts. So EZ to hear on A7-800s !!! Warning !!! - too much wire SLOWS the pace, and loses the timing, and De Highs!!

I FINISHED wire and orientation of my right channel last night. I had the high gain ( 1/2 12AX7 ) Driver stage's Rk bypass cap 180 degrees BACKWARDS, and, being a dominant tube, with most of the amp's gain, it was EASY to A-B that. The presentation became " more real sounding " to me, guitar strings in the background became more realistic, when I reversed it and Wonder Soldered it in place.

I am getting WEARY of all this work. I have been " busting my chops " ( self-imposed) on building this ALTEC VOTT system, " as good as I can ", since I got the 825 VOTT enclosures last December. I spent all of 2015 listening to 515B woofers full range !! One night this week I had a wire-span idea while lying in bed, got up at 3 AM and listened till 4:20 AM !!

Right now, I wanna finish the Left channel, and hear music at home, maybe invite some of my friends from Church over to hear it. I am VERY impressed with this simple two-way ALTEC. Love the horn loading's effect on the 515B woofer.

So many ALTEC A7 VOTTs are done wrong !!! A shame.

Jeff Medwin

 

I know I'm getting old..., posted on August 21, 2016 at 12:15:38
Lew
Audiophile

Posts: 10912
Location: Bethesda, Maryland
Joined: December 11, 2000
These days, after arriving at a very satisfactory place with my two audio systems, I am quite content to listen to music and fuhgeddaboudit. But not always; I still get the occasional itch. I definitely would not do what you tell me you do, however.

 

RE: I know I'm getting old..., posted on August 21, 2016 at 14:05:23
drlowmu
Manufacturer

Posts: 9730
Location: East of Kansas City
Joined: January 10, 2005
Lew,

I'm 71 and I intend this VOTT A7-800 to be my final big system. My parents lived till their mid 90s, but.... one never knows !!!

BUT, I really wasn't sure the A7-800 would be acceptable until about a month ago, after working on it since December 2015, with the ALTEC drivers in the enclosures. This is taking EVERYTHING I knew of, in audio, to get it to go !!!

About a month ago, I started to get the "feeling" it MAY work out - to "my" satisfaction. Within the past few weeks of my working, re-building my SET 45 amp, I am now confident it will be very acceptable ( AKA " Killer " ).

My Dynamics have Dynamics, getting good timbre, and the 45 amp plays the A7 and plays it like its 1,000 plus watts, not 1.5. ( LSES and wiring ).

Regards.

Jeff Medwin

 

RE: 100db speakers - like your A7 VOTTs?! You can't be serious., posted on August 21, 2016 at 15:32:29
drlowmu
Manufacturer

Posts: 9730
Location: East of Kansas City
Joined: January 10, 2005
Tim,

I would like to very respectfully say that you are not hearing what I have in my living room, and that additionally, and more importantly, you are dead wrong.

I thought almost ALL the moist - experienced listeners knew that ALTEC, JBL, and ALE, horn loaded, are the minimum possible to use - as speakers, if you do tube design.

If you ever get to the USA, come on over and visit me, give a listen !!

Thanks.

Jeff

 

RE: 100db speakers - like your A7 VOTTs?! You can't be serious., posted on August 23, 2016 at 17:59:24
PakProtector
Audiophile

Posts: 12366
Joined: May 14, 2002
Thanks Tim for putting the A7 stuff into words. I tried them, along with the later JBL and the transition from bass reflex to horn loading drove me nuts. For some stuff it was pretty good, but on many others, better results lie elsewhere...LOL
cheers,
Douglas

Friend, I would not hurt thee for the world...but thou art standing where I am about to shoot.

 

I would certainly not expect to hear nuances and small changes., posted on August 23, 2016 at 22:08:36
Timbo in Oz
Audiophile

Posts: 23221
Location: Canberra - in the ACT - SE Australia
Joined: January 30, 2002
For me speakers with good impulse response, and

i) first or third order crossovers on the tweeter,

ii) no Low-Pass xover (or a 1st) on the main driver - because it rolls off cleanly.

iii) a reasonable match for dispersion to both sides of the crossover point, smoothly narrowing higher up is all we can hope for.

iv) Good overload behaviour, low distortion, and slowly declining FR are also important. Flat within that which is going to be difficult with SET amps, to boot.

v) smooth diffraction behaviour from the enclosure / baffle.

vi) a quiet enclosure. (Geoff has sort of done that, with all those ceramic/concrete blocks).

Are all important to truly hearing what is going on.

I do not believe high sensitivity or high efficiency is vital, but it's not a bad thing.

Once you own such a system - in enclosures with smooth diffraction behaviour - the next step is 'stats. Which is where I am going.

LBNLeast - I've been in this hobby for over 40 years now and have heard quite a few A7 VOTT systems, and I wouldn't own a pair as a gift. I'd sell them.







Warmest

Tim Bailey

Skeptical Measurer & Audio Scrounger


 

RE: I would certainly not expect to hear nuances and small changes., posted on August 24, 2016 at 13:45:11
PakProtector
Audiophile

Posts: 12366
Joined: May 14, 2002
While not the 'end all' a stacked pair of Quad 57's is nothing to sneeze at. Not quite willing to make the investment, but I did enough development work on amps for such to know what it takes to get the most out of 'em...:)

For the time being, I'll stick with horns, active cross overs and gobs of power so most of the time I can *REALLY* stay away from clipping...not just thinking I am...LOL
cheers,
Douglas

Friend, I would not hurt thee for the world...but thou art standing where I am about to shoot.

 

The 63s will run off two modified LEAK Stereo 20s, strapped and high-pass filtered at 150Hz, posted on August 24, 2016 at 14:50:19
Timbo in Oz
Audiophile

Posts: 23221
Location: Canberra - in the ACT - SE Australia
Joined: January 30, 2002
40 watt mono-blocks, 4 ohm taps for both OPTs, giving a 'strapped OPT tap' of 2 ohms.

To retain the QUAD's impulse response the filters are high quality first order Passive Line Level inputs crossovers inside the amps.

I don't think the LEAKs will be working very hard.

I do not expect that system to clip. That's for the colder months.

And in Summer they will be driven by a nice big rebuilt Perreaux 6000C, again with passive 150Hz 1st High-Pass input filters.

Bass? 4 or 5 distributed DIY subs driven by a total of about 600 watts LP @ 150 Hz 3rd order, and analogue Eq'd - for now - by 2 to 4 1/3rd octave equalisers to get down to 20Hz if possible. ? Two big stereo power amps and two integrated amps.

Again, I don't expect much clipping, even though I do like to listen loud. :-)!

I'm not big into Rock music and not big into Mahler, I'm mostly into HIP classical.

I listen to live acoustical music about once a week, mostly choral with organ, and some chamber and chamber orchestra.

I used to record concerts for later broadcast on FM, and intend to go back to it.

As I'm a pensioner this has all taken time, a bit of money each month.

But we are now close to the first install, with an interim bass array of two boxes and 4 spherical encl. Giving 2 9" and 4 8" bass drivers - all getting down to 35Hz. That will keep us going and get my wife happy.

Yet to finish? two clam-shell P-P sealed subs (boxes are built), then build two TL subs with KEF B139s. I already have a large RB sub with a dedicated locally mfd long-throw 10inch ELF driver.


Warmest

Tim Bailey

Skeptical Measurer & Audio Scrounger


 

Tim, The system will only be as good as the modded Leak Amps, posted on August 25, 2016 at 00:29:46
drlowmu
Manufacturer

Posts: 9730
Location: East of Kansas City
Joined: January 10, 2005
On the Leak schematic, R21, 100 Ohms of series resistance, in the B+ filter to the Finals, needs to be avoided at ALL costs.

Suggest you PSUD2 a " Flywheel " B+ filter, as per THIS Forum, maybe eight years ago. ( L1/C1/L2/C2 ) Ls are 1 and =< 20 Ohms DCR. Easiest author to read on Flywheel supplies is Forum Member John L. Hasquin, and a good second choice is John Swenson, both are EEs and better yet - smart in audio.

You system will only be as good as your amps !!

That is where SETs can shine, IF done right, most are not, for sure Simplicity rules in audio design. You are listening to an extra ( 3rd ) stage, a phase inversion, and two coupling caps in series, that any good SET amp easily avoids.

Have FUN !


Jeff Medwin

 

Go away Geoff., posted on August 25, 2016 at 03:19:38
Timbo in Oz
Audiophile

Posts: 23221
Location: Canberra - in the ACT - SE Australia
Joined: January 30, 2002
My amps are fine.


Warmest

Tim Bailey

Skeptical Measurer & Audio Scrounger


 

KEF B139s in TL cabinets, posted on August 27, 2016 at 11:10:00
Lew
Audiophile

Posts: 10912
Location: Bethesda, Maryland
Joined: December 11, 2000
Tim, that's what I use as woofers to go with my Beveridge 2SW speakers, which cross over at 100Hz. I use a Dahlquist crossover just to provide the low pass filter, and I drive the TLs with a vintage Theshold Stasis 50W amplifier. I built my TL cabinets 40 years ago as the basis for a 3-way system, sold them after several years and then bought them back from the guy who owned them, after many more years. They are about 4.5 feet high, 20 inches deep, made of 1.25-inch MDF and veneered in formica, modeled on the Bailey formula published in Wireless World. I had them stored in my basement ever since repossessing them, until 3-4 years ago, when the Beveridge speakers came into my life. There were many moments over the years before I bought the Bevs when I contemplated trashing the cabinets and selling the NOS KEF woofers that I had kept around for the sole purpose of using them in the TLs. I am so glad I did not do that. The TLs mate very seamlessly with the Beveridge sound. They will be a perfect mate for your Quads, too.

 

Page processed in 0.032 seconds.