Tube DIY Asylum

Do It Yourself (DIY) paradise for tube and SET project builders.

Return to Tube DIY Asylum


Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded

Question about recapping a Dynaco ST70

99.181.45.74

Posted on July 10, 2014 at 13:13:47
Alpha Al
Industry Professional

Posts: 2957
Location: N. Carolina
Joined: February 16, 2004
Contributor
  Since:
December 3, 2015
I'm recapping an original Dyna ST70, it has never had any work done previously.

I obtained an exact replacement for the quad filter cap. It is 30/20/20/20uF @ 525VDC.

The original is wired with the 30uF section directly to the 5AR4 rectifier tube, then after the choke is 20uF, which is the point feeding the finals.

My question: would it make sense to use 20uF at the rectifier tube, then 30uF after the choke? I have seen data regarding the maximum amount of capacitance on a 5AR4, but can't put my hands on it now. It seems less capacitance on the rectifier tube might increase reliability.

Any comments? Thx, Al

 

Hide full thread outline!
    ...
RE: Question about recapping a Dynaco ST70, posted on July 10, 2014 at 13:25:13
Michael Samra
Dealer

Posts: 36118
Location: saginaw michigan
Joined: January 30, 2005
Al
Putting in the exact that it originally had is insane.Those small original values are simply not enough to run that amp in this day and age when you have listening material in the 90db and 100db range...If you are wise,I would get an 80/40/30/20 and put the 40uf off the GZ34 and the 80uf on the other side of choke and the 30 and 20 for the other sections.If you bought the cap you have now,you can probably send it back and pay the difference and get the 80/40/30/20.
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong" H. L. Mencken

 

RE: Question about recapping a Dynaco ST70, posted on July 10, 2014 at 13:26:41
Lee of Omaha
Dealer

Posts: 1800
Location: Omaha NE
Joined: September 8, 2006
I thought the maximum input capacitance for a 5AR4 is 50uF. Now I can't seem to find that datum easily. I can tell you we rebuilt an ST-70 and used a 50 uF input cap and the amp is a daily player for our customer with no problems after several months.

The size of the capacitance in the power supply is only a start-up issue; after the first few seconds the value harldy matters to the rectifier.

 

To answer your specific question..., posted on July 10, 2014 at 13:42:26
Steve O
Audiophile

Posts: 12323
Location: SE MI
Joined: September 6, 2001
...given the cap is in hand, I'd be inclined to put the 20uF at the rect and the 30 after the choke. However, the real world difference is pretty much negligible.

The max cap for a 5AR4 using cap input filter is generally speced at 60uF although there are a ton of factors that may alter this value. Also, contrary to what's stated elsewhere in this thread, the max cap is a limit not only during startup conditions but also during steady state operation unless special precautions are taken to limit peak repetitive current.

 

RE: Question about recapping a Dynaco ST70, posted on July 10, 2014 at 14:11:02
Tre'
Industry Professional

Posts: 17263
Location: So. Cal.
Joined: February 9, 2002
"The size of the capacitance in the power supply is only a start-up issue; after the first few seconds the value harldy matters to the rectifier."

That's not true.

With a capacitor input filter every half cycle one diode "turns on" for a brief time.

The peak current is high, much higher than with a choke input filter, and that peak current (that happens twice each cycle) is what can not be exceeded.

BTW, for capacitor input filters the data sheets state the minimum DC resistance per plate. If you have more than the minimum DC resistance per plate (either as drop resistors or as DCR in the HT winding of the power transformer) you can use a larger value cap and still not exceed the max peak current limit.

As an aside, you will notice (on the data sheets) that there is no minimum DCR per plate requirement when a critical inductance choke input filter is used. That's because the current flows for the entire half cycle for each diode so there is not large peak, in fact the current through the power transformer secondary and the diodes is just a little over the load current.

Start-up is a different issue.

Tre'
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
"Still Working the Problem"

 

RE: Question about recapping a Dynaco ST70, posted on July 10, 2014 at 17:03:37
Paul Joppa
Industry Professional

Posts: 7294
Location: Seattle, WA
Joined: April 23, 2001
Just a guess here - it may be that the 30uF is used in front because it has a higher AC current capability. Using the 20uF may save the tube but cause the capacitor to die early. The tube is more easily replaced, and has a less messy failure mode!

Here's another possibility worth remembering - we may know things now that were not known 50 years ago, but it's also possible that the designers of vintage gear knew things that none of us on this forum know. If you can't see why something was done, there was still probably a reason.

 

RE: To answer your specific question..., posted on July 10, 2014 at 17:50:41
xaudiomanx
Audiophile

Posts: 3647
Joined: August 16, 2004
After seeing a fireworks display on one of my amps putting a 60UF cap on the fier I now never use more than 40UF.

The cap that is a direct replacement for the Dynaco is a bit on the anemic side. I usually add more to the stages(about double) and I try to use film caps when I do.

 

RE: Question about recapping a Dynaco ST70, posted on July 10, 2014 at 17:54:42
xaudiomanx
Audiophile

Posts: 3647
Joined: August 16, 2004
Mikey,

That is exactly what I have done to an ST-70 unless the rec is SS. Then I would use about 100UF on the input and go from there, probably take out the choke and use a resistor of a proper value and power handling. I feel the choke suffocates the amp to a certain degree.

 

Pretty much agree..., posted on July 10, 2014 at 18:51:47
Steve O
Audiophile

Posts: 12323
Location: SE MI
Joined: September 6, 2001
...but I've seen 5AR4s handle 60uF w/o issue. It all "depends". One example is the Heath AA151. I've had an early Sovtek in mine for ~15yrs of occasional use and no fireworks yet.

 

RE: To answer your specific question..., posted on July 10, 2014 at 19:05:43
Tre'
Industry Professional

Posts: 17263
Location: So. Cal.
Joined: February 9, 2002
"... to limit peak repetitive current"

That's right!

And the more series resistance (DCR of the secondary winding or even added series resistors) the higher the cap value can be but if all one has is the minimum stated 'resistance per plate' then the max input cap is all you can use safely.

One way to solve the problem is to use a critical inductance choke input filter and then there is no current peaking and no minimum resistance per plate requirement.

It's all in the data sheets. One just has to know how to interpret them.

Start up surge is a different issue.

Tre'
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
"Still Working the Problem"

 

RE: Question about recapping a Dynaco ST70, posted on July 10, 2014 at 19:15:34
Eli Duttman
Audiophile

Posts: 10455
Location: Monroe Township, NJ
Joined: March 31, 2000
Just as important as getting the caps. right is dealing with the TOTALLY inadequate OEM C354 choke. "Shoehorn" a Hammond 159T in.

Personally, I'd use a 47 μF. 1st filter cap. and install a CL90 inrush current limiter between pin 8 of the rectifier socket and the PSU filter. I'd also install UF4007s in series with the 5AR4 plates, as has been documented repeatedly here on AA. "Fireworks" will not occur, even if a current production Sovtek 5AR4 is used.

Use a substantial amount of capacitance in the reservoir position. Hafler's reasons for the can he used were primarily monetary, not technical.


Eli D.

 

RE: Question about recapping a Dynaco ST70, posted on July 11, 2014 at 00:19:34
Michael Samra
Dealer

Posts: 36118
Location: saginaw michigan
Joined: January 30, 2005
Exactly Paul..A poly there is best if you can fit it in.
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong" H. L. Mencken

 

It is not just the cap, the load matters as well, and the ST70 is very "loadie", posted on July 11, 2014 at 09:10:42
Chip647
Audiophile

Posts: 2633
Location: The South
Joined: December 24, 2012
The ST70 asks a hell of a lot out of a single 5AR4. Put in 4007s before the rectifier plates.

 

Thanks to all who responded, posted on July 11, 2014 at 12:55:29
Alpha Al
Industry Professional

Posts: 2957
Location: N. Carolina
Joined: February 16, 2004
Contributor
  Since:
December 3, 2015
There's some good advice here.

I ended up using the stock value cap. As Paul mentioned, perhaps Dynaco did recognize a need to have 30uF as the first capacitor. And, as others have suggested, that is not too capacitance much for a 5AR4.

One of my concerns was preserving the original Mullard made rectifier. This amp is pristine, all tubes are original. I added diodes in series with the plates as Chip and Eli suggested. I have read other places that this helps prevent arc-overs.

I also added an additional 47uF in parallel with the 20uF for the reservoir after the choke. This gave me 30uF for the first cap, and 67uF for the reservoir, which is close to what Michael suggested.

 

RE: It is not just the cap, the load matters as well, and the ST70 is very "loadie", posted on July 11, 2014 at 15:09:20
xaudiomanx
Audiophile

Posts: 3647
Joined: August 16, 2004
If that's the case then why didn't Hafler just use a SS rec?

 

RE: It is not just the cap, the load matters as well, and the ST70 is very "loadie", posted on July 11, 2014 at 17:16:36
Steve O
Audiophile

Posts: 12323
Location: SE MI
Joined: September 6, 2001
When the ST70 was designed and introduced, 1959 or thereabouts, selenium rectifiers with the nec current and voltage ratings were large and had high voltage drop. Silicon rectifiers new and really expensive and usually required 2 in series to get the nec voltage rating. So, considering the budget nature of the amp, the 5AR4 was a logical choice even if run pretty much at absolute max rating. Too bad Hafler didn't opt for dual 5AR4s and more filtering beef like some other stereo amps of the time did. That would have been a giant killer.

 

RE: It is not just the cap, the load matters as well, and the ST70 is very "loadie", posted on July 11, 2014 at 17:18:10
Chip647
Audiophile

Posts: 2633
Location: The South
Joined: December 24, 2012
Probably related to the selenium rectifiers of the day not being as robust as the 5AR4. Not the case anymore. 1959 was a long time ago., the 1n4007 came out in 1966.

 

RE: It is not just the cap, the load matters as well, and the ST70 is very "loadie", posted on July 11, 2014 at 17:36:08
xaudiomanx
Audiophile

Posts: 3647
Joined: August 16, 2004
So you are saying that two parallel 5AR4's would do wonders to that amp? I have pulled out the choke on many occasions and it woke the amp up much more than I thought.

 

RE: Thanks to all who responded, posted on July 11, 2014 at 18:07:14
Eli Duttman
Audiophile

Posts: 10455
Location: Monroe Township, NJ
Joined: March 31, 2000
The next time you get a ST70 in, go "hog wild". :>D There is a good way to convert to SS rectified B+. "Ping" me, if you're interested.


Eli D.

 

RE: It is not just the cap, the load matters as well, and the ST70 is very "loadie", posted on July 11, 2014 at 18:14:51
Steve O
Audiophile

Posts: 12323
Location: SE MI
Joined: September 6, 2001
"Wonders" might be a little bit of hyperbole but dual rectifiers and beefed up PS would be a big improvement. Or, if you're not committed to 100% tubes, go silicon for the rectifier with due precautions for higher B+. Dave Gillespie covered the SS route in some detail @ Audio Karma a while back. Worth checking out!

P.S. Don't mean to imply a stock ST70 can handle 2x5AR4...PT isn't up to addl filament load. Just that ideally, dual rectifiers would have been the way to go at the time. SS can be done with the stock PT.

 

Yes, 2 5AR4s would do wonders, but it would also melt your stock power transformer, posted on July 11, 2014 at 18:23:06
Chip647
Audiophile

Posts: 2633
Location: The South
Joined: December 24, 2012
Think solid state in an ST70

 

Steve O can you please supply link to D. Gillespie?? , posted on July 12, 2014 at 03:54:24
johnmil
Audiophile

Posts: 527
Location: Texas
Joined: December 21, 2002
Hi,
Dave Gillespie is a very frequent poster on AudioKarma. Can
you please provide a link to the specific SS discussion you
mention????

Thanks and regards to all,
John

 

Try this..., posted on July 12, 2014 at 05:24:11
Steve O
Audiophile

Posts: 12323
Location: SE MI
Joined: September 6, 2001
...a long thread but worth a read. Interesting conclusions about the stock circuit of the amp.

 

RE: Try this..., posted on July 12, 2014 at 07:05:53
johnmil
Audiophile

Posts: 527
Location: Texas
Joined: December 21, 2002
Thanks, Steve. I appreciate you.

 

Yeah, you're right..., posted on July 12, 2014 at 10:04:41
Lee of Omaha
Dealer

Posts: 1800
Location: Omaha NE
Joined: September 8, 2006
I gave the simplified answer. As the capacitance goes up, the conduction angle goes down, and peak current goes up.

Rectifiers can take significant repetitive short-term overloads due to the electron cloud surrounding the cathode, so in most cases there should be no problem. If it does cause a rectifier to have a short life, an input choke can be inserted (low resistance, moderate inductance, enough to increase conduction angle).

 

IIRC..., posted on July 12, 2014 at 11:51:46
wheezer
Audiophile

Posts: 4309
Joined: January 24, 2001
it's been while - C1 gets slammed(charged) 120 times per second (mains Freq. x2)

The size of the cap in uf determines the amount of current drawn from the secondary, required to charge C1. Which in turn, (ohms law) the primary sees that current as well.
This is why increasing the already huge C1 bank on SS amps can cause the fuse to blow.

 

RE: Thanks to all who responded, posted on July 13, 2014 at 09:33:56
airtime
Audiophile

Posts: 11287
Location: Arizona
Joined: February 4, 2003
I tried converting my st70 to SS rectifiers and didn't care for it. Really lost a lot of the tube magic. Ended up reversing it back to my good old RCA GZ34

charles

 

Page processed in 0.037 seconds.