Do It Yourself (DIY) paradise for tube and SET project builders.
Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded
Why are OTL amps not so popular
1.64.113.188 |
||
Posted on July 21, 2012 at 03:27:56 | ||
RE: Why are OTL amps not so popular, posted on July 21, 2012 at 04:00:05 | |
OTL does not sound any better with an amplifier using a quality audio transformer. |
They typically require a ton of 6AS7 or Sweep tubes for relatively low power, posted on July 21, 2012 at 08:26:27 | |
But, they are "cool" as hell. |
They are not uncommon -- using SS! [NT], posted on July 21, 2012 at 16:58:11 | |
Posts: 2784
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia Joined: November 10, 2003 |
I forgot.., posted on July 24, 2012 at 10:20:44 | |
Posts: 10912
Location: Bethesda, Maryland Joined: December 11, 2000 |
The first Watt, of course. |
RE: Marketing, plain and simple, posted on July 24, 2012 at 21:16:29 | |
Posts: 7296
Location: Seattle, WA Joined: April 23, 2001 |
Good article, a cogent defense of zero feedback, with which I agree. |
the effect of feedback on output impedance, posted on July 25, 2012 at 08:09:51 | |
Posts: 4778
Location: Minnesota Joined: April 24, 2002 |
Agree that any amp can be built with no global NFB but in practical terms that means more tubes with OTL and most use quite a bit. Actually this statement is not correct. There is confusion in the industry about the term 'output impedance'! Take a look at the link below- under the Voltage Paradigm, the term 'output impedance' does not refer to the actual output impedance of the amplifier, it refers to the servo gain of the feedback circuit. If adding feedback really did lower the output impedance, we could easily drive lower impedance speakers with greater power simply by adding feedback. This would of course violate Kirchhoff's Law, one of the most fundamental laws of electricity. Obviously you can't do that :) The reality is that to get more power, you need more tubes, bigger transformers (or more transistors, bigger heatsinks, etc.) and the like. So it is obvious that the term 'output impedance' has become conflated with the use of negative feedback but in the real world the two are quite different. Under the Power paradigm, output impedance is the actual impedance of the output circuit, which will be exactly the same whether feedback is applied or not. IOW, this has a lot to do with how much power the amplifier will make and into what load. To give you a practical example, we have our M-60 which makes 60 watts into 8 ohms using eight (10-watt) power triodes to do it. The amp makes about 40-45 watts into 4 ohms. Now if you add 30db of negative feedback to it, those power levels don't change at all. If the output impedance were indeed lowered, the 4 ohm figure would be seen to rise. But is doesn't, so we know that the output impedance is unchanged. This is true of all amplifiers and what we can take from this is that there are special charged terms in the Voltage Paradigm that are used in a way that does not exist elsewhere in the electronics industry (and so it should not be surprising that audiophiles and engineers alike are confused as a result); 'output impedance' is one of them ('sensitivity' in loudspeakers is another). However in the world of audio, the Voltage Paradigm is the predominate means used to do test and measurement- that is what you see in the pages of Stereophile and other magazines when amps and speakers are tested. I am very much convinced that the use of the Voltage Paradigm has set the audio industry back as it seeks to create numbers that look good on paper rather than create specs that relate directly to human hearing/perceptual rules. In seeking to 'look good' (one of the most powerful human motivators BTW) it literally throws the baby out with the bathwater; anyone who has looked at amplifier specs knows what I mean- you can't tell much about how the amp will sound from the specs. |
RE: I agree, posted on July 25, 2012 at 13:52:49 | |
Posts: 4778
Location: Minnesota Joined: April 24, 2002 |
Low efficiency and in particular low impedance speakers are a problem for any amplifier, not just an OTL. The fact of the matter is that even a transistor amp that easily doubles power from 8 to 4 ohms will not sound its best on a 4 ohm load, for the distortion will increase with the 4 ohm speaker, and it will be both audible and measurable. Four ohms does help if you are trying to get raw sound pressure, but if you are trying to get the most realistic sound it represents a compromise at best. Paul Speltz, who markets a product known as the ZERO has an interesting letter from Steve McCormick, stating that while his amps drive 4 ohms easily, they sound much better driving the 4 ohm speaker trough the ZERO, meaning that the amp is actually loaded at 16 ohms. In speaking with other designers of transistor gear that I know from being at CES and the like, they all concur, to paraphrase: "just because it can drive 4 ohms or less does not mean its sounding its best." |
RE: Correct., posted on July 25, 2012 at 23:39:57 | |
Posts: 7296
Location: Seattle, WA Joined: April 23, 2001 |
Thanks - that makes sense now. |
Got it. Thanks. (nt), posted on July 26, 2012 at 17:01:40 | |
Posts: 17303
Location: So. Cal. Joined: February 9, 2002 |
.
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music "Still Working the Problem" |