Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies.
Return to Computer Audio Asylum
Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded
Is MQA technology getting closer to us?
62.44.135.56 |
||
Posted on August 18, 2016 at 12:46:42 | ||
Posts: 15703
Location: Copenhagen Joined: March 21, 2005 |
I am talking about getting the technological capability to transform an existing digital format into MQA to playback through an MQA capable Dac. By us, I mean you, not the recording industry and not Meridian. Unless this happens, how can it ever get off the ground? A few months ago, it was the latest brand of snake oil available only via the commercial sector, and as I recall, the majority here (friends and enemies, both) were not buying the hype. |
RE: Is MQA technology getting closer to us?, posted on August 18, 2016 at 13:10:42 | |
Posts: 1846
Joined: March 31, 2008 |
MQA claims to do two things -Correcting time domain errors -Lossy compression of higres Any idea which AD converter has been used during recording? If not, how do you think to correct for time domain errors of this ADC? MQA take the part above 20 kHz of a e.g. 192 kHz recording and fold it in the bits below 17. This is not a lossless process - Do you have any clue why "we" would sacrifice dynamic range ? - Do you have any clue why "we" are in need of lossy compression? The Well Tempered Computer |
RE: Is MQA technology getting closer to us?, posted on August 19, 2016 at 01:13:55 | |
Posts: 821
Joined: January 18, 2002 |
Hi Frihed. We're not likely *ever* going to see a situation where you or I will have access to the encoding software for MQA. This is Meridian/MQA's trade secret sauce licensed to the music industry and folks like Tidal. Only people able to "authenticate" the sound will be able to encode into this format. Of course the whole "authentication" idea makes no sense for Tidal! I mean, unless they just push all their hi-res and have it encoded into MQA, just how many songs can then they play in MQA at the start that has actually been meticulously "de-blurred" with information from the studio about the original ADC, DSP processing, etc. that could have affected the temporal domain!? ------- Archimago's Musings: A 'more objective' audiophile blog. |
RE: Is MQA technology getting closer to us?, posted on August 19, 2016 at 06:47:38 | |
Posts: 821
Joined: January 18, 2002 |
Agree PAR. I think you're right... I don't recall what the claims would be for unauthenticated MQA like this though... Hard to imagine any kind of de-blurring in this situation. Seems to me at best they just do the data reduction with the lossy ultrasonic folding. ------- Archimago's Musings: A 'more objective' audiophile blog. |
Apple & MQA... RE: Is MQA technology getting closer to us?, posted on August 20, 2016 at 00:21:43 | |
Posts: 821
Joined: January 18, 2002 |
Apple is not going to pick up MQA. They would not be so silly to do it! It makes little sense to maintain the infrastructure for such a proprietary system. They're more likely to go with lossless streaming 16/44 like Tidal than pick this up. ------- Archimago's Musings: A 'more objective' audiophile blog. |
RE: Apple & MQA... RE: Is MQA technology getting closer to us?, posted on August 20, 2016 at 08:14:19 | |
Posts: 821
Joined: January 18, 2002 |
Sorry JE, missed the joke in the thread I guess :-). Agree. As far as I know, the masses did not ask for hi-res streaming. And certainly nobody asked for this kind of strange hodge-podge of proprietary encoding, lossy ultrasonic reconstruction, strange claim of time-domain accuracy (hard to imagine how they can achieve this in the vast majority of records), etc. I really cannot imagining anyone thinking the scheme is such a good idea if one took some time to consider what they're doing, the obvious limitations, and loss of freedoms for end users with standard DACs and ability to use DSP. IMO, this will obviously fail. It was destined to be so since the beginning simply because it doesn't offer anything of obvious benefit. ------- Archimago's Musings: A 'more objective' audiophile blog. |