Computer Audio Asylum

Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies.

Return to Computer Audio Asylum


Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded

Upgrade from AQ Dragonfly v1.2

71.205.80.52

Posted on April 24, 2015 at 21:18:55
dandaroy
Audiophile

Posts: 503
Location: Denver, CO
Joined: June 24, 2003
Been listening to streaming music from Spotify Premium with this. Sounds pretty good except there is a slight rough edge when compared to my AN tube cdp which sounds organic and completely free of digital glare. I would like to know if there are USB DACs in the $500 range that would be an improvement in this regard. Another thing I may have to realize that Spotify is not CD resolution (320 kbps) and maybe some of the hardness is source related. Do you think upgrading the DAC will improving listening experience or am I expecting too much. Like I said listening fatigue sets in after a moderate listening session whereas with my cdp I get none or if I get some, it is due to the music being played or played too loud.

Note: I like listening from my CD collection. I use the computer primarily for streaming from Spotify and occasionally Pandora. I am not interested in digitizing my collection to use with the DAC exclusively.
-------
I. Dandaroy

 

Hide full thread outline!
    ...
RE: Upgrade from AQ Dragonfly v1.2, posted on April 24, 2015 at 21:49:52
Sprezza Tura
Audiophile

Posts: 4585
Location: New York City
Joined: August 24, 2012
The $499 iFi Micro iDSD is the best $500 I have heard, bar none. To my ears it utterly stomps the AQ Dragonfly.

 

RE: Upgrade from AQ Dragonfly v1.2, posted on April 25, 2015 at 07:15:28
dandaroy
Audiophile

Posts: 503
Location: Denver, CO
Joined: June 24, 2003
I was thinking of getting a tube dac. What DACs in this range are you comparing the ifi to? I noticed I would be paying for headphone amp which I do not need.
-------
I. Dandaroy

 

RE: Upgrade from AQ Dragonfly v1.2, posted on April 25, 2015 at 09:08:28
Sprezza Tura
Audiophile

Posts: 4585
Location: New York City
Joined: August 24, 2012
I would strongly forgo a tube dac at that price point..you will regret it.

Cheap and tubes do not go together.

Don't worry about the headphone amp, you get a fully analog volume control which allows for a fixed or variable output, filter choices, DSD, if you care, and hub or battery power.

I have had over a dozen sub $500 DACs in my systems..Musical Fidelity, HRT, AQ, CIA..etc..all of them very good, but the iFI beats them all on sonics.

 

RE: Upgrade from AQ Dragonfly v1.2, posted on April 25, 2015 at 10:58:52
dandaroy
Audiophile

Posts: 503
Location: Denver, CO
Joined: June 24, 2003
Thanks for the info. What is so special about the micro iDSD compared to micro iDAC or the nano iDSD besides the price?
-------
I. Dandaroy

 

RE: Upgrade from AQ Dragonfly v1.2, posted on April 25, 2015 at 17:59:09
Sprezza Tura
Audiophile

Posts: 4585
Location: New York City
Joined: August 24, 2012
The Micro iDSD is clearly better than the Nano. I have used them side by side..the Micro is more sophisticated sounding.

The only thing I know about the iDAC for sure is that does not have DSD capability, and I think the iDSD has some other design updates, but I am not positive about that.

 

Do you have any experience with Halide HD DAC? (nt), posted on April 25, 2015 at 18:31:05
dandaroy
Audiophile

Posts: 503
Location: Denver, CO
Joined: June 24, 2003

-------
I. Dandaroy

 

Any Product at more than twice the price should Stomp., posted on April 25, 2015 at 19:55:54
oldmkvi
Audiophile

Posts: 10581
Joined: April 12, 2002
Dragonfly is fine for it's price.

 

RE: Any Product at more than twice the price should Stomp., posted on April 25, 2015 at 20:26:21
Sprezza Tura
Audiophile

Posts: 4585
Location: New York City
Joined: August 24, 2012
"Any Product at more than twice the price should Stomp."

In today's digital this is not always the case with all the snake oil marketing, pseudo features, and buzzword mania.

 

RE: Do you have any experience with Halide HD DAC? (nt), posted on April 26, 2015 at 08:39:30
Sprezza Tura
Audiophile

Posts: 4585
Location: New York City
Joined: August 24, 2012
No, but everyone who has heard it loves it. I could be wrong but I think it is stuck at 24/96, making it really non-competitive.

 

RE:"the Micro is more sophisticated sounding.", posted on April 26, 2015 at 08:48:14
rick_m
Audiophile

Posts: 6230
Location: Oregon
Joined: August 11, 2005
And the units for that are?

R.

 

Schiit Bifrost Uber, posted on April 26, 2015 at 10:08:58
G Squared
Audiophile

Posts: 8475
Location: Washington, DC Metro Area
Joined: November 16, 2004
Contributor
  Since:
May 23, 2023
Even the files downloaded from Itunes sound good.
Gsquared

 

RE: Schiit Bifrost Uber, posted on April 26, 2015 at 11:27:29
dandaroy
Audiophile

Posts: 503
Location: Denver, CO
Joined: June 24, 2003
Is the Schiit going to be a bit analytical for me? If you look at my system you will notice that I like some warmth. I have no experience with Bitfrost, but I could certainly try it from Amazon. I am just trying to narrow down my choices so that I do not have to try and return stuff if I do not like it. It gets tiring after a while.
-------
I. Dandaroy

 

RE: Do you have any experience with Halide HD DAC? (nt), posted on April 26, 2015 at 12:46:09
RhythmDevil
Audiophile

Posts: 226
Joined: November 23, 2014
I have one. As you say, it sounds great.

Yes, it is limited to 24/96. I disagree that this makes it "non-competitive"; out of the many GB of ripped files in my systems, almost all are Redbook, and all but a couple of the "HD" rips are 24/96. Lack of 24/192 capability was a total non-factor for me when purchasing, and I suspect that is true of many people, even amoungst we inmates.

But then again people say my Ayre QB-9 is "non-competitive" because it only accepts USB input. It is to laugh!


Cerebrate!

 

RE: Do you have any experience with Halide HD DAC? (nt), posted on April 26, 2015 at 14:02:12
Sprezza Tura
Audiophile

Posts: 4585
Location: New York City
Joined: August 24, 2012
Well, as far as non competitive..I really mean on paper since there are a slew of other units that do do 192 and even higher for less..

For most 24/96 will be all they ever need. I happen to have a huge 192 library.

Actually, as far as the QB9, I see it's one input as a strength, you know full well it is optimized for one specific application. The Ayre is a peace of mind purchase, as it sounds great and is hassle free, and as good as I have heard.

 

RE: Schiit Bifrost Uber, posted on April 27, 2015 at 11:20:46
msa
Audiophile

Posts: 677
Location: Northeast
Joined: November 1, 2002
IMO the Schiit dacs are neutral, well-balanced and the best that I have had in my system

 

Page processed in 0.028 seconds.