Music Lane

It's all about the music, dude! Sit down, relax and listen to some tunes.

Return to Music Lane


Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded

Sunday Morning Opera/ Choral Choice: Colin Davis' Final Berlioz Requiem

173.46.78.175

Posted on October 5, 2016 at 13:24:24
LSO Live.

Yeas? Nays?

 

Hide full thread outline!
    ...
RE: Sunday Morning Opera/ Choral Choice: Colin Davis' Final Berlioz Requiem, posted on October 5, 2016 at 14:10:05
Kas
Audiophile

Posts: 776
Location: Eastern Massachusetts
Joined: December 5, 2006
I haven't heard it, and this won't answer your question, but you may find this recent article interesting:

 

St. Paul's has way too much echo for my taste, posted on October 5, 2016 at 18:23:44
Posts: 26483
Location: SF Bay Area
Joined: February 17, 2004
Contributor
  Since:
February 6, 2012
I didn't keep this one around for very long. [EDIT: perhaps I should say that the LSO Live recording captures too much of the echo in St. Paul's for my taste.]

Unfortunately, I'm pretty wedded to the past wrt the Berlioz Requiem, with the Munch and Davis/Pentatone (Philips) sets being my standbys. I wish there were a more modern recording I could get behind, but all the newer multi-channel versions are compromised for me in one way or another. (I don't like the Spano/Atlanta recording on Telarc either - I thought that Telarc's earlier Shaw recording was much better, but the Shaw recording is not hi-rez and it's not multi-channel.) The same situation applies to the Levine/BPO version on DG (with Pavarotti!): I liked the performance, but I want my modern sonic amenities too! ;-)

 

So you're saying the reverberation works against the music?, posted on October 5, 2016 at 19:02:48
I was intrigued considering Berlioz wrote the piece with such an acoutic in mind.

I didn't care for either Munch or Davis 1 because of the weak choirs.

 

Yes - Berlioz wanted a big space. . . , posted on October 5, 2016 at 19:44:15
Posts: 26483
Location: SF Bay Area
Joined: February 17, 2004
Contributor
  Since:
February 6, 2012
. . . but that LSO Live recording was overdone for my taste (i.e., the ratio of direct to reflected sound wasn't ideal). I still get a good sense of the reverberation on the earlier Davis and Munch recordings - although in neither of these cases is it big cathedral reverberation.

Oops! I just looked and I still DO have the Davis LSO Live SACD. (I could have sworn I jettisoned it!) Maybe I'll give it another listen tomorrow! ;-)

 

No worries, as long as the Lacrimosa isn't smeared. Dedicate it to the Mets tonight. : ) nt, posted on October 5, 2016 at 22:08:20
.

 

de Billy on Oehms, posted on October 6, 2016 at 07:26:41
Kas
Audiophile

Posts: 776
Location: Eastern Massachusetts
Joined: December 5, 2006
Have you tried this one? Excellent performance and sound (superb tenor solo, too):

 

I have not heard that recording, posted on October 6, 2016 at 08:19:47
Posts: 26483
Location: SF Bay Area
Joined: February 17, 2004
Contributor
  Since:
February 6, 2012
I had a couple of DVD's conducted by de Billy and wasn't that impressed, but it sounds from your post as if I should give him another chance! ;-)

 

Same here, thanks for recommendation. nt, posted on October 6, 2016 at 08:42:30
k

 

RE: So you're saying the reverberation works against the music?, posted on October 6, 2016 at 15:24:57
vahe
Audiophile

Posts: 449
Location: Houston, Texas
Joined: September 11, 2005
I didn't care for either Munch or Davis 1 because of the weak choirs. "

For the finest in choral performance may I recommend the most obscure recording of Requiem, this one is on Naxos, Elora Festival Orchestra, Noel Edison conductor, the choir is Toronto Mendelssohn Choir & Toronto Mendelssohn Youth Choir. The recording is fairly distant with tons of reverberation.
Of all the Requiems this one stands out for the beauty of its choral performance particularly in more peaceful parts.

Vahe

 

Would you believe Norrington?, posted on October 6, 2016 at 15:31:30
Kal Rubinson
Reviewer

Posts: 12436
Location: New York
Joined: June 5, 2002

Definitely a contender in the modern multichannel competition.

 

RE: Would you believe Norrington?, posted on October 6, 2016 at 16:10:18
pbarach
Audiophile

Posts: 3307
Location: Ohio
Joined: June 22, 2008
I might need to try this. I bought the Spano/Atlanta SACD. I'd never heard the Berlioz Requiem before. Well, I still haven't, because the performance is dull-dull-dull, and the sound is lackluster.

 

Yes - I haven't heard their Berlioz Requiem, but on other recordings, those folks are excellent [nt], posted on October 6, 2016 at 18:50:22
Posts: 26483
Location: SF Bay Area
Joined: February 17, 2004
Contributor
  Since:
February 6, 2012

 

No Norrington, nohow, no way! [nt] ;-), posted on October 6, 2016 at 18:51:45
Posts: 26483
Location: SF Bay Area
Joined: February 17, 2004
Contributor
  Since:
February 6, 2012

 

RE: Sunday Morning Opera/ Choral Choice: Colin Davis' Final Berlioz Requiem, posted on October 8, 2016 at 02:17:03
goldenthal
Audiophile

Posts: 1001
Location: Ontario
Joined: March 28, 2003
Thank you, Kas!

It is one of my all-time favorite pieces of music, the apotheosis, I think, of romanticism. Having lived for some time with each of the Ormandy and Abravanel performances, I settled long ago on the first Davis and didn't expect to be tempted by another, but now I may try the Bernstein though I've never been a huge Bernstein fan.


Jeremy

 

That's what said before I heard it. [nt] ;-), posted on October 8, 2016 at 11:32:07
Kal Rubinson
Reviewer

Posts: 12436
Location: New York
Joined: June 5, 2002


 

Page processed in 0.026 seconds.