Planar Speaker Asylum

Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.

Return to Planar Speaker Asylum


Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded

Mini Maggies for the Desktop with Class D Amplifier

38.104.58.170

Posted on April 15, 2017 at 18:15:48
svisner
Audiophile

Posts: 1165
Joined: March 30, 2002
Thought I'd try out the Mini Maggie's (with DWM module) for my desktop. I'm using an NSMT Model A100 Amplifier amplifier, which is a modified TA TPA3116-based unit. This is, of course, a Class-D component, against which Magnepan warns on their Website. However, so far results are quite good. The amplifier provides adequate power - and appears to have more than sufficient headroom. I'll see how much I enjoy this setup (drive my a Schitt Modi DAC). I imagine I'll be "dialing in" speaker position for the next day or so, although I've rather little latitude regarding placement.

 

Hide full thread outline!
    ...
Class-D component, posted on April 16, 2017 at 06:29:54
neolith
Audiophile

Posts: 4842
Location: Virginia
Joined: February 21, 2002
Contributor
  Since:
December 2, 2004
Magnepan doesn't warn against Class-D, they just say they were disappointed with the results using mini Class D amps. If it sounds ok to you then there is no problem. OTOH you may be missing out by not using a Class A/B or A or a large Class D, like the W4S.



"Our head is round in order to allow our thoughts to change direction." Francis Picabia

 

RE: Class-D component, posted on April 16, 2017 at 08:55:21
svisner
Audiophile

Posts: 1165
Joined: March 30, 2002
Thanks. I am grateful for the suggestion. At the moment, I think the NSMT will suffice. We're awaiting completion on work on our house, so we're in a rental now, pending a move to our house. The system I'm using, therefore, is intended as "temporary," though I suspect it will be the desktop system when we move. As it happens, our main system has Maggies driven by a McIntosh 240, but our Maggie center channel is driven by a Crown XLS Class D amplifier. It sounds very good, and I've been thinking of building a Class D-based system. Fun to experiment. (The Crown XLS amplifiers seem to have built a bit of a following.)

 

I think the top of the food chain in amps regarding Maggies, posted on April 17, 2017 at 07:08:13
Green Lantern
Audiophile

Posts: 16952
Location: San Diego, Ca
Joined: November 12, 2002
Contributor
  Since:
June 17, 2003
are those in the high current class. At least in my opinion.

I have a set of Gunned MMGs that were recently attached to a pair of Quicksliver V4 (200w tubed mono blocks). They sounded fine at first but could not reach the level of resolution compared to the pair of KEF LS50s I recently acquired and currently evaluating. The tube amp(s) simply could not cut through the 'fog' of the panels to reach the clarity and separation as the LS50s do. However, once I hooked the MMGs up to my Emotiva XPA-1 monos (1Kw each) they not only open up and came alive, they also created a clear and concise soundstage. This experience was also observed with a pair of VTL 100 mono tube blocks I own. Granted these aren't the best tube amps in the world and I'm sure there are some out there that will drive them to their fullest but you'd probably have to spend a fair amount of money on them.

Obviously 1kw would be overkill on the mini Maggies (and it's true ribbon) , just something to think about.


YMMV.









 

RE: I think the top of the food chain in amps regarding Maggies, posted on April 17, 2017 at 12:58:36
DrChaos
Audiophile

Posts: 2063
Location: San Diego
Joined: July 13, 2009
To me it sounds like the tube amplifiers were the ones doing the fogging.

Probably just a high output impedance.

 

RE: I think the top of the food chain in amps regarding Maggies, posted on April 17, 2017 at 13:31:23
Green Lantern
Audiophile

Posts: 16952
Location: San Diego, Ca
Joined: November 12, 2002
Contributor
  Since:
June 17, 2003
Doc you're probably right, you really should stop by and have a listen to the G-MMGs in comparison to your G-1.6s









 

RE: Class-D component, posted on April 17, 2017 at 13:52:56
Satie
Audiophile

Posts: 5426
Joined: July 6, 2002
There is no inherent problem using class D amps, they just need to be of proper ratings for power and current and as well made and refined as you are willing to pay for.

Maggies, and particularly ribbon models are quite revealing of common nits in the high frequency performance of most class D amps. That said, they have improved substantially over the last decade. And competing class A AB amps of similar power performance are not necessarily that much better at the same price points.

The Crown XLS series amps are powerful and relatively inexpensive and in audiophile terms they are downright cheap. But when compared to similar powered or even lesser powered well designed class AB amps they are loose in the bass and not as resolving on top. What it is most obviously is inoffensive. For actual performance in refinement and bass you can use a higher line of amps from Crown, like the XTI series and even the extremely high power macrotech "i" or "HD" series at an appropriately higher price.

 

RE: Here you go, posted on April 18, 2017 at 10:16:21
josh358
Industry Professional

Posts: 12332
Joined: February 9, 2010
I tried out the XLS 2500 and while I think many would be happy with it, there were some oddities to the sound.

My first impression:

My initial impression was that the midbass was fuzzy and uncontrooled. However, it was such a brief listen that I want to give it more of a chance.

Just spent several hours going back and forth with the A-21, listening full range. My impression is that the Crown has plenty of depth, etc. It doesn't sound bad at all and if someone wants a big mother amp for $300 bucks they'll be delighted. But when I switch to the A-21, it's as if the instruments are *there* behind the wall, surrounded by their natural ambiance. It's hard to explain but there's a palpability to the image, my eyes keep moving to look at the violin or cello or whatever. And with the Crown that doesn't happen.

Also, when I pushed the level way high by mistake, we're talking well over 100 dB and the speakers were compressing, the Crown turned into a midrange muddle. So I tried connecting it to the A-21 and the muddle went away, it was just clipping on the peaks. But the Crown's limiter was turned on, so it may have been that.

Also, my setup still coarse, tomorrow I'll match levels with a multimeter, and check that the polarity is the same, then move the amps to the listening position so I can switch between them more quickly -- no time to contrive a switch because I have to make a decision soon. And run them off separate circuits so they don't pull one another's voltage down.


A. Wayne added:

Playing Classical Music on the Crown was an eye and ear opener, couldn't unplug it fast enuff, contrast it with Jazz, Horns in particular , i thought it was fantastic, a bit thin and bright but really boogied, then I started to notice the artificial ping on Pianos' every Piano sounded like a keyboard, then the classic Music disaster.

Again , the amp is sensitive to power cords and environment ( RF) so YMMV and it may all be system dependent in my case, but you know how it goes, once you hear a negative, it never leaves yah ...


And then me again:

OK, so I did the serious comparison yesterday, levels matched with a meter within a fraction of a dB, polarity matched, amps in front of me so I could switch without moving my head. I listened first to both channels to judge imaging, then to only one channel to facilitate switching, then to one channel, woofers alone. It just reinforced my original impressions, to whit:

- The Crowns sound very nice when you just plug them in. They won't take your ears off. If you have only $300 bucks for an amp, I think you'll be happier with the Crowns than with most alternatives.

However:

- There is something seriously wrong with piano, as you say. The notes are missing their attacks, making them sound more like a keyboard than a piano. Piano has a 20 dB peak/average ratio and it seems that the Crowns are smearing the transients. Maybe the filters?

- Pushed even a very little bit, the sound starts to become metallic and midrangey and stuck in the center -- is this Davey's IMD? Pushed a lot, the effect is disastrous shoutiness, while the A-21 handled the same overload with just brief transient distortion. We're not talking about subtle in that case, but brickbat obvious.

- There's something wrong with the imaging. With the A21, instruments in an audiophile recording of a string quartet seem to be hanging out there, somewhere beyond the wall; they're so palpable that my eyes move around to follow them. With the Crowns there's good depth, but no palpable image forms. My eyes don't move. Much of the time I can't even tell where they are. It's a very strange phenomenon.

- I think there's strong phase distortion from the filters. At least, when I was setting them up, voltage doubled between the hot terminals of the amps at IIRC 2 kHz. So I figured phase was inverted. But when I backed the frequency down to 80 Hz, the voltage difference went down to zero. I don't have a scope here so couldn't investigate further but it does look like serious phase shift from the output low pass filter. I'd be curious to see measurements of group delay and ringing, both of which could potentially contribute to the issues we've heard.

- Again and again, I had the same experience -- the A-21's sounded pure and easy to listen to long term. I didn't want to switch away from them. But I'd listen to the Crown and the subtlety and details were gone and it became fatiguing even though it wasn't making *bad* noises like graininess that I normally associate with listener fatigue.

- I had the sense that small details and ambience were being removed, as in those early undithered 14-bit digital recordings. What seems at first superior cleanness on the Crown's part seems to be that it's suppressing very low-level distortion.

- Since I planned to use these on the woofers, I tried disconnecting the mid-tweeter panel and just listening to the woofer panels, which are LPF'd at 250 Hz. Even then, I could clearly hear the difference between the amps. On walking bass on a jazz recording, with the A-21, one heard a full, round note. On the Crown, that full, round note had gone missing. It's not like you can't tell that there's a bass there or what note its playing, but it seems more fuzzy distortion than the full, round note.

- With mid-tweets disconnected, I could still hear the problem with piano attacks.

Bottom line, it was a fun experiment, but they're going back.

https://www.audioasylum.com/cgi/vt.mpl?f=mug&m=218492

 

RE: I think the top of the food chain in amps regarding Maggies, posted on April 18, 2017 at 13:27:05
DrChaos
Audiophile

Posts: 2063
Location: San Diego
Joined: July 13, 2009
I haven't had the 1.6s for years now, I'm using 3.6r's.

 

RE: Class-D component, posted on April 18, 2017 at 14:06:05
DrChaos
Audiophile

Posts: 2063
Location: San Diego
Joined: July 13, 2009
I use NAD M22 class-D amplifier (Hypex nCore) with my 3.6R's and it sounds great to me. Then again, that's a substantially more expensive amplifier.

 

RE: Class-D component, posted on April 18, 2017 at 15:39:02
Satie
Audiophile

Posts: 5426
Joined: July 6, 2002
Execution and parts quality (and quantity - i.e. available overhead) make a difference with any design.

 

RE: Class-D component, posted on April 18, 2017 at 17:47:43
TitaniumTroy
Audiophile

Posts: 626
Location: Mishawaka, Indiana
Joined: October 14, 2006
I use a Parasound A23, 225 watts @4 ohms, seems to work pretty well. I tried one of their desk top models (z-amp v3) at around 60 watts @ 4 ohms, this resulted in thermal shut down after awhile. Plus not enough power in a small bedroom/office, for even moderate levels.

 

RE: Class-D component, posted on April 18, 2017 at 20:28:21
svisner
Audiophile

Posts: 1165
Joined: March 30, 2002
The NSMT seems to have plenty of power. It runs quite cool.

 

Page processed in 0.031 seconds.