Planar Speaker Asylum

Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.

Return to Planar Speaker Asylum


Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded

definitely tweeters in

72.220.169.158

Posted on February 16, 2017 at 17:38:35
Green Lantern
Audiophile

Posts: 16952
Location: San Diego, Ca
Joined: November 12, 2002
Contributor
  Since:
June 17, 2003
I've been alternating between tweeters in vs tweeters out (thanks to my Maggies on wheels).




Vocals are centered and defined. Raising the cables helped as well. But with everything else associated with this hobby it comes with a price: shorter soundstage. With the tweeters 'out' the soundstage is wide, open and expansive; tweeters 'in' bring the soundstage more inward, tighter, and intimate. Forunately most of my listening is small jazz combos (trios through quintets). When I'm ready to throw on orchestras I'll have to dose-see-doe and swing my pardner round and round (Maggies switching sides).



This weekend is calling for rain so I'll be fiddle fartin' around the room (gonna try and hang this monster on the wall as well:












 

Hide full thread outline!
    ...
RE: definitely tweeters in, posted on February 16, 2017 at 18:14:32
JBen
Audiophile

Posts: 3082
Location: South FL
Joined: May 18, 2008
Contributor
  Since:
July 26, 2010
Ohhh, crap. Yet another battle is looming :)

I am with you, at least in my room.

 

RE: what have you found re. sound stage *depth* ..., posted on February 16, 2017 at 18:32:51
andyr
Manufacturer

Posts: 12548
Location: Melbourne
Joined: September 2, 2000
comparing ribbons in vs. ribbons out?

Sure, ribbons out gives you a nice wide soundstage (which is what I have) and ribbons out will shrink it down ... but which has the greater depth?

Andy

 

RE: what have you found re. sound stage *depth* ..., posted on February 16, 2017 at 18:55:55
Green Lantern
Audiophile

Posts: 16952
Location: San Diego, Ca
Joined: November 12, 2002
Contributor
  Since:
June 17, 2003
depth is deep; although I attribute this more towards the mid range. Right now I'm listening to Bobby Hutcherson's 'like Sonny' and the tweeters are firing in layers (rearward and foward) and slightly behind the panels. The speakers are about 8' from the wall and his vibraphone is about 4 ft from the front wall but the drummer's high-hat is about 4' even further out (coming towards me). His ride cymbals are slightly ahead of his vibes, the piano is to the right and about a foot from the front wall. A nice little 'bubble' going on there but not much activity happening towards the left and right walls although I'm sure there would be if the tweeters were placed on the outside. I recommend his album 'Wise one', lots of fun and synergy happening in there.

Keep in mind I haven't really experimented with toe-in/out; will do so this weekend. Also I've never done the panels aimed at the side walls configuration before, looking forward to doing that as well; again thanks to the wheels.

Once I settle in on a compromising position the wheels will come off, but I'm in no hurry.









 

RE: definitely tweeters in, posted on February 17, 2017 at 05:25:25
neolith
Audiophile

Posts: 4842
Location: Virginia
Joined: February 21, 2002
Contributor
  Since:
December 2, 2004
It's room dependent and in and out will vary from one user to another. Hard to tell from your picture but the toe-in seems shallow. What are your measurements from the wall and how much toe-in?



"Our head is round in order to allow our thoughts to change direction." Francis Picabia

 

RE: definitely tweeters in, posted on February 17, 2017 at 06:52:21
Posts: 599
Location: North East
Joined: November 13, 2010
For the toe in,I put a tape marker on the carpet about where my feet rest in the center seating position.I used two long tape measures with the flat backs against and 90 degrees to the center of each panel and then angled them so the tapes crossed at the tape mark on the floor.

 

RE: Toe in, posted on February 17, 2017 at 11:58:53
BigguyinATL
Manufacturer

Posts: 3475
Joined: April 10, 2002
That sounds a lot like my MMG setup - 45 degrees to in - tweeters in
Inside edges 7 Ft apart - center of speakers 7 ft from most common head position.


"The hardest thing of all is to find a black cat in a dark room, especially if there is no cat" - Confucius

 

RE: what have you found re. sound stage *depth* ..., posted on February 17, 2017 at 12:42:03
watts
Audiophile

Posts: 536
Location: B.C.
Joined: June 30, 2004
Another vote for the outies. Soundstage aside, for me it came down to the tonal balance. Tweeters in were just a little too prominent for me. Again, I have gone direct from DAC into the amps, and the whole system has become a little hotter. Resolving and detailed as hell; but tipped to the treble end moreso than when the preamp was in the chain.

But that was when I only had 50 hours on the DAC. I now have about 300 or so and I believe it is a little smoother, so maybe I will "doesee do" !

 

agree: tweets in, posted on February 17, 2017 at 13:00:28
DrChaos
Audiophile

Posts: 2063
Location: San Diego
Joined: July 13, 2009

I've preferred tweeters in for every maggie I had, and I listen to mostly classical. If you want soundstage wider, move the speakers out.

And I also like modest toe-in, less than generally recommended.

 

RE: what have you found re. sound stage *depth* ..., posted on February 17, 2017 at 13:02:26
DrChaos
Audiophile

Posts: 2063
Location: San Diego
Joined: July 13, 2009
Which maggie do you have? The 3.6 and 1.6 era were pretty hot in treble for me. I used/use 1.5 ohm resistors (with chokes in series) and that nails it. My room is reflective as well (no rugs/carpets) so it's even more necessary, but probably 1 ohm is good for many.

 

Generally end up with tweeters in also., posted on February 17, 2017 at 13:50:43
grantv
Manufacturer

Posts: 7724
Location: B.C.
Joined: January 15, 2002
Every so often I'll try them out, but usually end up in. My preferred sound / soundstage with tweeters in, is mid panels meeting at a point in front of me.
I also find the tweeter/mid separation distance can dictate a lot, and should be what is maintained if you flip speakers. I prefer IIRC around 7 feet or so in my room, but I'd have to measure to be sure.

 

RE: definitely tweeters in, posted on February 17, 2017 at 15:01:14
ahendler
Audiophile

Posts: 5151
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Joined: January 24, 2003
You guys really ought to try the Limage/HK setup. If it works in your room you will never go back to any other setup
Alan

 

NOW, posted on February 17, 2017 at 16:24:48
slapshot
Audiophile

Posts: 2248
Joined: January 9, 2006
you need to motorize those Maggies and listen as they zoom around the room! :)

 

RE: definitely tweeters in, posted on February 17, 2017 at 16:27:30
JBen
Audiophile

Posts: 3082
Location: South FL
Joined: May 18, 2008
Contributor
  Since:
July 26, 2010
These Limage/HK evangelists. Darn it, Alan, am I getting old! LOL Should have seen you coming a mile away.

[BTW , I was about to drop a line or two for Josh's benefit elsewhere here. It's related to PC-audio. You may want to pitch in if you see fit.]

 

HK/Limage configuration, posted on February 17, 2017 at 16:45:05
slapshot
Audiophile

Posts: 2248
Joined: January 9, 2006
For this configuration, tweeters also in. And no toe in.

 

RE: definitely tweeters in, posted on February 17, 2017 at 21:06:04
Satie
Audiophile

Posts: 5426
Joined: July 6, 2002
Limage setups are phenomenal when they work. You get a better fuller tonal balance and the wide soundstage of the tweeter out position and the image precision depth and detail of the tweeter in setup when in the near equilateral nearfield positioning scheme traditional for maggies.

GL, The maggies are generally crossed over to provide better time alignment in the tweeters out position, which is why they sound fuller and give bigger soundstages even with the distance between tweeters held constant.

I don't know if your room would support. the Limage setup since IIRC it is pretty much square. But it is worth a try.

 

RE: what have you found re. sound stage *depth* ..., posted on February 18, 2017 at 07:35:32
watts
Audiophile

Posts: 536
Location: B.C.
Joined: June 30, 2004
3.6's . My resistors are bypassed; no option for that now.

 

RE: definitely tweeters in, posted on February 18, 2017 at 07:39:08
ahendler
Audiophile

Posts: 5151
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Joined: January 24, 2003
It is important to know that Limage does not always work. You simply have to try it
Alan

 

RE: agree: tweets in, posted on February 18, 2017 at 07:40:12
watts
Audiophile

Posts: 536
Location: B.C.
Joined: June 30, 2004
If I listened to classical predominantly, I would have them in also. It is the rock recordings that are unfortunately mixed to be played back in cars that require the tweeters out.

 

Agree keep the tweet distance apart equal... in or out, posted on February 18, 2017 at 12:44:11
I keep my tweets 'in' now 100% of the time.
My speakers are wider apart than average.
but with tweets the same place as if 'out'.
Works for me in my room.

 

RE: definitely tweeters in, posted on February 19, 2017 at 08:37:19
Green Lantern
Audiophile

Posts: 16952
Location: San Diego, Ca
Joined: November 12, 2002
Contributor
  Since:
June 17, 2003
I'd like to try this setup but that would place one speaker directly in the walk path and would require the speaker cables to run underneath a carpet.

In addition my cables aren't lenghty enough to perform this free tweak (I estimate I'd need at least 15' per speaker x4 total in a biamp; However-it just so happens I'm waiting on a 100ft spool of pure copper speaker wire to arrive for a pre-planned DIY cable project. But even at 100' that may not be enough (my plan is to use triple lengths of 18ga in a helical pattern in 6' lengths biampe'd). Fortunately copper wire is fairly inexpensive -about $30 total.









 

RE: definitely tweeters in, posted on February 19, 2017 at 08:59:49
Listeners seem willing to go to any lengths for improved sound.
:-) (Tweeters out is my preference.)

 

RE: definitely tweeters in, posted on February 19, 2017 at 11:59:04
Green Lantern
Audiophile

Posts: 16952
Location: San Diego, Ca
Joined: November 12, 2002
Contributor
  Since:
June 17, 2003
LoL ain't it the truth!









 

RE: definitely tweeters in, posted on February 19, 2017 at 20:02:32
watts
Audiophile

Posts: 536
Location: B.C.
Joined: June 30, 2004
Copper is not copper, but I may be barking up the wrong tree.

 

RE: agree: tweets in, posted on February 19, 2017 at 21:21:12
Utley1
Audiophile

Posts: 1609
Location: NYC
Joined: July 30, 2010
Have the opposite view after many hous of experimentation. I have a big room 26x18x12.I play classical, organ and opera. Also is most revealing with piano

 

RE: definitely tweeters in, posted on February 19, 2017 at 23:47:47
pictureguy
Audiophile

Posts: 22597
Location: SoCal
Joined: October 19, 2008
I experimented a LOT when I got my panels, at least the 1.6s.
Tweeters in or out?
And listen to fron or back?

All 4 logical cases were tried and I ended up tweeter 'in' and listening to the mylar side.

Some setups were immediately junked out. Others lasted an hour while several lasted a couple weeks or more.
The better the setup, the more time it took to properly evaluate.


Too much is never enough

 

RE: definitely tweeters in, posted on February 20, 2017 at 11:41:22
Posts: 599
Location: North East
Joined: November 13, 2010
For most every variable in set up there are trade offs.What are the trade offs of having the tweeters in vs out?

 

RE: definitely tweeters in, posted on February 20, 2017 at 12:34:24
Satie
Audiophile

Posts: 5426
Joined: July 6, 2002
There are two main issues, the simple one is that you have the crossover designed for the tweeters out position, where the driver timing (offsets) integrates with the crossover's delays. The second is interaction with the sidewalls.

The "best" balance of reflected to direct sound is usually with the tweeter at about 3ft from the sidewalls. Larger distances emphasize the center image and reduce the dominance of ambient cues. If your room is narrow, then the tweeters out position will end up pushing the speakers too close together and the soundstage would narrow somewhat. In a wide room you would be able to "isolate" the speakers from the sidewall interactions and have tweeters out at either the normal 3ft distance to the sidewalls or pulled further into the room to give you the listening distance to interspeaker spacing ratio that provides you with the best aspect angle for your listening preference. For example, I like to have a close up perspective of a front hall seat. That requires a wide aspect angle that most people don't like. Most recordings are made with the assumption of a 60 degree angle so you are trying to get a wider soundstage than the recording was intended to provide. I was pleasantly surprised that it actually works quite well in presenting a close up orchestra without the soundstage distorting its shape up to nearly 160 degrees, My preferred angle is normally closer to 120 deg...
In a wide room with the tweeters in you hardly have any sidewall participation and you get minimonitor like lateral and depth dimensions with terrific precision, but lack a bit of an ambient sense of the hall.

 

RE: definitely tweeters in, posted on February 20, 2017 at 14:01:03
pictureguy
Audiophile

Posts: 22597
Location: SoCal
Joined: October 19, 2008
There are two main issues, the simple one is that you have the crossover designed for the tweeters out position, where the driver timing (offsets) integrates with the crossover's delays.



Well SAid. I've been trying to simplify this for a while now without success.


Next step would be FIR crossover at the line level and add some delay to the nearest driver. Maybe 1ms or 2ms tops would do.
Too much is never enough

 

Page processed in 0.048 seconds.