Planar Speaker Asylum

Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.

Return to Planar Speaker Asylum


Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded

1.7i's verses LS 50's and KEF Blades...long...

107.4.171.8

Posted on October 5, 2015 at 09:43:40
Mark Man
Audiophile

Posts: 1079
Location: MN
Joined: January 31, 2010
Saturday my Engineer friend, Bill and I went to 2 different Audio Stores. The first one was Halston Entertainment. A very elegant large store with many rooms and some very large wide open spaces. With more of focus on custom HT. He had bought a Universal brand remote there, but really did not look around much when he was there...

We met there at 11:00 AM he comes up from small town in Southern MN about 70 miles away, me from a suburb 30 minutes north...After walking around a few minutes, I ask to listen to a pair of KEF LS50's they had set-up...I have never heard them and really wanted to know what all the buzz was about...They were hooked up to a Marantz Integrated and Marantz CD player...We each had our own references CD's burned to put the speakers we were going to listen to through their paces. I know his references and he knows mine...

The LS 50's were on a pair of 28"-30" stands, don't know exactly the height...but they were the highest pair of stands they had displayed. They are quite impressive little speaker. They imaged pretty well, went deeper than I would have expected and sounded "good", but nothing special...I had to crouch down to get my ears at tweeter height when they sound there best...the width of and depth of sound stage was decent and well defined. I thought the midrange was a little dull and highs were a little bright...The salesman, very good guy, told us they were his best sellers for the "new" 20 year old something crowd who is discovering vinyl...

Then the salesman asked us if wanted to listen to the big KEF Blades hooked up to an all Bryston stack...28 sst2's, Bryston CD player and Pre...These were truly impressive speakers...big room filling sound. They did everything right. I had not heard a really good pair of full range speakers in quite a while. The deep bass was tight, tuneful and musical...really impressive. Standing or sitting very very little change in presentation...the MSRP is $32,000 and they were selling these demos for $20,000...fit, finish and workmanship was beautiful, a really good looking speaker with a huge cool factor...could live with these and not look back...

So after spending an hour there, we headed over to Audio Perfection, the local Maggie dealer to listen to the 1.7i's. Bill has been a tweaked 1.6 owner for 14 years. Has a very small listening room, that my 3.7i's did NOT work in...(you can search my Moniker for a post I wrote on that experience). I had called the day before to Audio Perfection to have them set-up 1.7i's in one of there small rooms...

They were hooked up to a Ayre Integrated, (AX-7e) and Ayre CD player, (CX-7e)...both nice pieces. The Ayre AX-7e is 120 watts into 4 ohms, so IMHO, under powered for the 1.7i's...but still sounded really good.

After listening to a few songs, we adjusted the 1.7i's placement by moving them a total of 18" further apart, which put them about 2' from the outside walls and pulled the listening chairs back about 18" also...this was very similar to his room and the speakers were about 4' off the front wall, with a 15 to 20 degree toe in...

We both have listened to 1.7's a few years back when I was living in KC, that was in a very big room and hooked up to a Rotel Integrated...sounded good, but not that much different than his 1.6's...I know lots of variables, but that was our impression at that time...

Now this experience with the 1.7i's was completely different. I was expecting good, but got great...the extension of highs was pretty damn close to my 3.7i's without the better dispersion of the ribbon tweeter...Like the rest of .7 models I have heard the coherence is truly special...they sound like a single driver...

The imaging, sound stage, frequency extension top and bottom, rhythm, pace and musicality were much better than the 1.6's. I am usually chirping in Bill's ear while we are listening pointing out things I am hearing...aka...I have a big mouth and I am a talker...duh...but during this listening session I intentionally kept my mouth shut and let the speakers do the talking...we got through about 6-8 songs of his reference CD, not listening to whole songs but skipping around to listen to different parts of each song...we did not get through all his references and I did not get to put in my reference CD...He said he wanted to go talk them, salesman and the owner...I did not ask why or what was up...so I put in my CD and really enjoyed what I was listening to...

After about 10 minutes I walked out into the Lobby and he was signing a credit card receipt...he said he had NO intention of buying them that day, but after listening to them in a very similar room size of his and making sure they worked well, unlike my 3.7i's that did NOT work in his small room...

They had a pair on hand in a color combo that worked for him, Black on Black...(he really did not care about the trim, just wanted black cloth)...while they were finishing the paper work and getting them loaded up, we went and listened to the .7's which I had heard when I was auditioning the REL S3 sub for him, which he bought 2 months ago, (have a thread on that experience too)...the .7's were not as refined or play as big as the 1.7i's, as expected and a Rotel frontend, so not on equal footing by no means...but as Magnepan says go for the biggest model that will work in your room...

Back to the tittle of this post...the KEF LS 50's were not even in the same league as 1.7i's or the .7's...the LS 50's sell for the same price of as the .7's...if you can handle the looks and placement of .7's it really is a no brainer...the 1.7i's smoked the LS 50's in everything...

The KEF Blades are truly a great full range speaker and room filling ...but on sale for $20,000 verse $32,000 MSRP and the brand new 1.7i's selling for $2200...at the demo price of the Blades they are in NO WAY 10 times better than the 1.7i's...and with the right sub you can get allot closer to the full range presentation of the Blades...

Yes...Yes...I get that the 1.7i's could not fill that big room like the Blades did, but based on just Sonics they were very very close to a speaker that that costs 10 times more, (demo's), with a $20,000+ Bryston frontend, Compared to a $6000 Ayre frontend with the 1.7i's.

So, basically a $40,000+ rig did not sound that much better than $8200 rig...add sub and that gap gets even closer just based on sound quality taking the size of room out of the equation...

I was really glad we heard the KEF LS 50's and Blades prior to listening to 1.7i's with the same musical references...it took me overnight to sleep on it, but it hit me the next day like a bolt of lighting what an extreme value Magnepan speakers are...I know this is not anything earth shattering...but damn it was fun day. Also reassures me that there are no new speakers in my future anytime soon...unless I move and have a room that could handle the 20.7's

Since this is the Planar Board and we are biased towards that di-pole presentation and I am preaching to the choir...but this experience just reassured me WHY I own Maggies...still IMHO, the best bang for the buck speaker that I know of...

Thanks
Mark



 

Hide full thread outline!
    ...
RE: 1.7i's verses LS 50's and KEF Blades...long..., posted on October 5, 2015 at 12:01:07
russ69
Audiophile

Posts: 951
Joined: December 13, 2009
I have a pair of KEF LS50s and I mostly agree with your opinions. It's the tweeter that lets the LS50 down, it is just not extended enough and the speaker lacks air. I was playing around with some super-tweeters this weekend and that perks up the presentation considerably. The tweeters I was using were not good enough to leave in place but they gave a hint as to what that speaker is lacking.
On the other hand, yes Maggies are a bargain in every size and price range and for me at least, even the MMGs are better at most things than the LS50. You just can't understate how good this 300 dollar speaker can be if feed correctly and placed right.

 

RE: 1.7i's verses LS 50's and KEF Blades...long..., posted on October 6, 2015 at 13:35:05
Utley1
Audiophile

Posts: 1609
Location: NYC
Joined: July 30, 2010
I use the 1.7's with an inductor and it is everything you said. Tilts the energy to the middle bass, and works in my less optimum room placement. Just a an unearned joy in my life.

 

LS 50's , posted on October 6, 2015 at 20:01:52
mbnx01
Audiophile

Posts: 7956
Location: Eagle, Idaho
Joined: October 22, 2004
I own a pair, and I own .7's.

It doesn't sound like the LS50's were given their best setup here. It takes a long time to find out what works. I've had my .7's about two months now and I'm just beginning to find their measure.

Love them to death, they're an amazing speaker. But I've also heard LS50's do some amazing things. For the right person, with the right gear, music, listening habits... the LS50 might be the right choice.


'A lie is halfway around the world before the truth gets its boots on'. -Mark Twain

 

Yeah, apples and oranges, posted on October 7, 2015 at 04:44:16
johnvb
Audiophile

Posts: 495
Joined: October 26, 2011
The LS50s do best in small rooms. Driven too hard / loud (to fill up a larger room), and they can distort or sound thin. And they do need better electronics to sound their best. Preferably tubes.

A better comparison would be against the MiniMags. Although the ribbons on the Maggies would sound nicer to some, the Kefs would most certainly be more dynamic. Then there is the whole mono vs dipole thing, so the listener will be bias as to what they prefer.

I always get a kick out of how, thanks to all the "glowing reviews" and "class A recommendation", the little LS50s have a big target on their back. I bet KEF has sold a boatload of them though :)



 

RE: LS 50's , posted on October 7, 2015 at 05:40:12
Mark Man
Audiophile

Posts: 1079
Location: MN
Joined: January 31, 2010
I totally agree, so many variables at a dealers, I did say they had a Marantz Intergraded and Marantz CD player in a fairly big room and the stands were too high...and did say they were "good"...I just really expected more that's all...

When I heard the .7's, they were in a small room with a REL S2 sub, that mated perfectly with them. .7's had a Rotel frontend, but did all the Maggie things very well...I had owned a pair of MG 12's way back when and thought the .7's were a much better speaker...

My main point was they were a much better value...IMHO...that's all...

The 1.7i's in a small room with that Ayre front end were truly impressive...The Ayre Intergraded being only 120 Watts into 4 ohms pushed them pretty well in that small room...

What is your frontend with .7's...Just curious...
Thank you for your input...
Mark

 

RE: Yeah, apples and oranges, posted on October 7, 2015 at 06:37:17
Mark Man
Audiophile

Posts: 1079
Location: MN
Joined: January 31, 2010
"The LS50s do best in small rooms. Driven too hard / loud (to fill up a larger room), and they can distort or sound thin."

It was a very big room, and as I mentioned a Marantz frontend and the stands are were too high... We did not push them hard at all...I did say they were "good"

"A better comparison would be against the MiniMags."

Three things here...I have heard the Mini-Maggies twice...both times they seemed very disconnected from DWM and not very good at all...

The Mini-Maggies are marketed as a desk top "system" the KEF LS 50's are not...

My biggest comparison was base on the SAME MSRP and IMHO .7's were a better value...

"the Kefs would most certainly be more dynamic. Then there is the whole mono vs dipole thing, so the listener will be bias as to what they prefer.

Because I have not heard the KEF's OTHER THAN AT A DEALERS and the .7's the same both without stellar frontends...in my head YES the LS 50's "should" be more dynamic...

YES, I am absolutely bias for the di-pole presentation...

"I always get a kick out of how, thanks to all the "glowing reviews" and "class A recommendation", the little LS50s have a big target on their back. I bet KEF has sold a boatload of them though :)"

Guilty as charged...I had BIG expectations because of ALL the glowing reviews...agree again BIG target on their back...

The salesman said they ARE their best selling speaker and 20 something vinyl crowd was buying the heck out of them and the only speaker they stock...every other speaker has to be ordered...

I really liked the LS 50's, but preferred the .7's...that's all...I am a Maggie guy...so totally get...

As with any really good resolving speaker, "you are what you eat", so a better frontend or tubes with the LS 50's I can imagine in small room would sound very good...both the .7's and LS 50's would benefit from a good sub...

So YES...apples and oranges...but based on MSRP, and the right room to handle .7's, that is the route "I" would go for all the above reasons...

In this totally SUBJECTIVE hobby and it is difficult to get two Audiophiles to agree on the time of day...hey, that's why they make Fords and Chevy's...

The 1.7i's really blew me away for the $2200...to the point I felt I could compare them to a $20,000 demo pair of KEF Blades...the Blades were awesome, but NOT 10 times more awesome than the 1.7i's based on price...

I am an extremely CHEAP audiophile, but also felt my 3.7i's, Sanders Magtech and CJ CT-5 Pre sound better than the Blades, other than the deep Bass...the Blades had $20,000+ Bryston front end...My CJ and Magtech...USED were $7200...

So, johnv as I respect your opinion and can see allot of potential in the LS 50's...they are just not for me...

Thank you for your input...
Mark


 

RE: Yeah, apples and oranges, posted on October 7, 2015 at 09:23:14
johnvb
Audiophile

Posts: 495
Joined: October 26, 2011
It's encouraging that the 20 something crowd is buying anything audiophile related...maybe there's hope for the hobby yet.

 

RE: LS 50's , posted on October 7, 2015 at 13:56:38
mbnx01
Audiophile

Posts: 7956
Location: Eagle, Idaho
Joined: October 22, 2004



Front end - Sota Comet & Dynavector, Yamaha SACD feeding Chord 2qute, ARC SP-17, Rogue Hydra.

I once tried my LS50's in a small room with a 15wpc 6v6 tube amp - was wonderful.

But I gotta say... I've owned Maggies off and on since 1979 and these .7's just blow my mind. They are amazing speakers and maybe the best value on the market.






'A lie is halfway around the world before the truth gets its boots on'. -Mark Twain

 

RE: Yeah, apples and oranges, posted on October 7, 2015 at 15:23:41
josh358
Industry Professional

Posts: 12332
Joined: February 9, 2010
Sounds like the Mini Maggies were poorly set up. Phasing between DWM and the satellites is critical and as with all planars, they need space to breathe. I heard them right after hearing the 3.7's and they were comparable, which is to say spectacular -- it's hard to believe that that sound is coming from two little speakers. This was nearfield listening, though, as desktop speakers. When I moved back a few feet from the desk, they were still good, but lost some of their big-speaker-in-a-tiny-package magic.

Not comparing them to the LS-50's, which I haven't heard, just pointing out that you appear to have heard them under poor conditions.

 

the two places I have heard them..., posted on October 7, 2015 at 19:57:02
Mark Man
Audiophile

Posts: 1079
Location: MN
Joined: January 31, 2010
The first place was in KC up to Rotel intergraded fed off an I-pod with AIFF files...it was a desk set-up and DWM was under the desk and just boomed...no tone or connection to the mains...they mains sounded really nice...

The second place I have heard them on 3 different occasions was the Magnepan Production office...same set up with a Wadia (sp?) and a I believe a Philips CD player...Once again the DWM was under the desk and just boomed and sounded very disconnected...

Now Shelia in customer service used them in an HT set-up with two DWM's and said they sounded very good...

I do not doubt set-up properly they could sound really good, as I said the mains sound good, but the DWM was under a desk both times and just boomed...so I am only saying this has been MY personal experience with the Mini's system...

The LS 50's being the same price as the .7's that was my bench mark for comparison...I much preferred the ,7's, but as a Maggie guy...I have a bias towards di-pole presentation...

thanks for chiming in Josh...good to hear from you...
Thanks
Mark

 

RE: the two places I have heard them..., posted on October 7, 2015 at 20:05:08
josh358
Industry Professional

Posts: 12332
Joined: February 9, 2010
Hey, Mark!

Funny, we both heard them at Magnepan but the one's I heard were in Mark Winey's office with, IIRC, dual DWM's. I don't remember any boominess or sense of disconnection. Mark's desk faced out into the room whereas as I recall Sheila's faces the wall, that could have something to do with it.

By chance, I just read Steve Guttenberg's review of the .7's, and like you, he seems to prefer the .7's to the LS50's:

"Of course, some folks can't live with large panel speakers, and they will be happier with a small, high-end stand mount monitor speaker like the KEF LS50. It's terrific, but it sounds awfully small after you hear the Magnepan .7. The SVS Prime tower speakers sound bigger than the LS50, but the Primes are still no match for the .7 for producing closer to life-size music in your living room."

http://www.cnet.com/news/new-sensations-the-radically-different-magnepan-7-speakers/

 

Great front end for the .7's, posted on October 7, 2015 at 20:39:54
Mark Man
Audiophile

Posts: 1079
Location: MN
Joined: January 31, 2010
Nice looking, clean rig with great gear...

I would really like to hear the ARC SP-17 with the Rogue Hydra pushing the .7's...really cool combination...

Attached below was my review of the REL S2 with the .7's...I felt the .7's sounded better than the Wilson Sabrina's...at $15K verses $1500...

Thanks for sharing that...I do agree the .7's are real giant killers and just a tremendous value...

Do you still have your Quads? And how do the .7's compare to those if you don't mind me asking...

Thanks
Mark

 

RE: the two places I have heard them..., posted on October 7, 2015 at 20:57:20
Mark Man
Audiophile

Posts: 1079
Location: MN
Joined: January 31, 2010
You obviously have more Juice than I do...I did not make it into Mark Winey's office...

Yes, Shelia's desk is up against the wall...and the place in KC where I heard them was the same scenario...so not letting DWM's do their thing...

The 3 times I have been to the Maggie factory have all been great experiences...Lots of MN "NICE" floating around there, hard working Midwesterners with extreme pride in the work they do...lots of hands on go into every pair of Maggies...Good peeps making great speakers...

And they still survived without a Stereophile reviews and measurements...go figure... ;)

thanks Josh
Mark

 

RE: the two places I have heard them..., posted on October 8, 2015 at 06:05:05
josh358
Industry Professional

Posts: 12332
Joined: February 9, 2010
Here's the arrangement in Mark's office. Of course, it helps to have the designer seated next to them, they're on their best behavior!




 

The Mount Rushmore of Magnepan...question, posted on October 8, 2015 at 06:54:20
Mark Man
Audiophile

Posts: 1079
Location: MN
Joined: January 31, 2010
Like I said Josh...you have allot more juice than I do...great pic...

Who is currently the chief designer and came up with the .7 series using QR for the base and series crossover? Is it Mark?

Thanks
Mark


 

RE: The Mount Rushmore of Magnepan...question, posted on October 8, 2015 at 07:55:28
josh358
Industry Professional

Posts: 12332
Joined: February 9, 2010
Alas, the one condition on my visit was that the design process was off limits -- otherwise I had the run of the place. I would have loved to see the R&D lab!

I do know though that the foil quasi ribbon was what Jim had originally wanted to use on the Maggies, and that they had used wire instead because of manufacturing practicality -- it's easier and cheaper to apply the wire. IIRC, they'd also had a model with a series crossover, and I read somewhere that Mark had wanted to eliminate the external crossover box -- he told me that most customers these days are less interested in bi amping and crossovers, which makes sense considering the availability of decent-sounding high powered amps -- bi amping still sounds better of course, but less better than it did in the days of the D-76.

 

Still in the Black Opps or Skunk works mode..., posted on October 8, 2015 at 08:14:30
Mark Man
Audiophile

Posts: 1079
Location: MN
Joined: January 31, 2010
I was wondering who the Chief design is and/or how many engineers on staff???

I do get, getting rid of the outboard factory passive x-overs...and since this tweaking Maggie board at times and how much people like to "upgrade" their Maggies...when they changed to the series x-over, I remember this board and all the sky is falling posts...But we have Neo, doing surgery on the 3.7i's, now...so it begins...

It does not surprise me they did not let a guy like you in the R&D lab...
(that is a complement, by the way, because you would "know" what you are seeing...unlike a guy like me that would just say..."cool")

thanks for sharing...to their credit, the end results speak for themselves...

Mark

 

RE: Still in the Black Opps or Skunk works mode..., posted on October 8, 2015 at 08:55:58
josh358
Industry Professional

Posts: 12332
Joined: February 9, 2010
I do know that they're big enough to have a specialized engineering staff, e.g., production engineer, QC engineer, etc. And of course Mark and Jim are engineers themselves. While I didn't get to witness the R&D effort, when I was there I was impressed by how everyone worked together. It seemed a very collegial atmosphere and they're used to working as a team.

While he couldn't show me current products, Wendell did offer to show me some of the projects they've worked on in the past. I would have loved to see them, but we ran out of time. I did see by chance a bunch of prototype Mini Maggie baffles of all shapes and sizes. It gives you an idea of how much tweaking and experimentation goes on to produce the sound we take for granted.

 

RE: Great front end for the .7's, posted on October 8, 2015 at 09:24:50
mbnx01
Audiophile

Posts: 7956
Location: Eagle, Idaho
Joined: October 22, 2004
Oh yeah, the Quads are keepers. The .7's are great for the money, play louder and have a huge image. But other than that the Quads are better across the board. It's not close.








'A lie is halfway around the world before the truth gets its boots on'. -Mark Twain

 

RE: Great front end for the .7's, posted on October 8, 2015 at 09:29:51
Mark Man
Audiophile

Posts: 1079
Location: MN
Joined: January 31, 2010
I have only heard Quads once many many years ago...so I cannot really comment...

Are you using the same frontend and just swapping them out?

thanks
Mark

 

RE: Great front end for the .7's, posted on October 8, 2015 at 14:04:34
mbnx01
Audiophile

Posts: 7956
Location: Eagle, Idaho
Joined: October 22, 2004
Yup. That's one of the things I like about the Hydra, it's stable into anything and sounds great on whatever speaker I'm using.



'A lie is halfway around the world before the truth gets its boots on'. -Mark Twain

 

RE: Great front end for the .7's, posted on October 8, 2015 at 16:47:03
Mark Man
Audiophile

Posts: 1079
Location: MN
Joined: January 31, 2010
I have never heard and of the Rogue Gear...

but everyone on AA loves their stuff and great value...

I just like that there are allot of great American audio manufacturers turning out great pieces...

ARC
Rogue
CJ
PS Audio
Ayre
Magnepan
MAC
Sanders
Magico
Pass
bel canto
Joseph
Boulder
just off the top of my head...

Thanks again
Mark


 

RE: Great front end for the .7's, posted on October 8, 2015 at 17:52:07
mbnx01
Audiophile

Posts: 7956
Location: Eagle, Idaho
Joined: October 22, 2004
Vandersteen and Ryan Acoustics.




'A lie is halfway around the world before the truth gets its boots on'. -Mark Twain

 

RE: Great front end for the .7's, posted on October 8, 2015 at 20:40:28
Satie
Audiophile

Posts: 5426
Joined: July 6, 2002
The old WATT Puppy sounded closed in compared to the Neo8/T IV and they were always a disappointment to me. Every time I ended up in their demo room at the dealers was a disappointment.

I also dislike their balcony perspective on orchestral works. I like the presentation at stage height you get from vertical line sources.

 

RE: 1.7i's verses LS 50's and KEF Blades...long..., posted on November 1, 2015 at 05:54:07
volumezero
Audiophile

Posts: 95
Location: BKK
Joined: July 7, 2004
Good write up. I've been looking at the ls50 also and will probably get a chance to listen to them in the next several days. However, over the weekend I had the opportunity to listen to the atc scm19, followed by the 1.7s. I was sold on the scm19 until I listened to the 1.7s.

The ATCs are wonderful speakers, very neutral and transparent. However, to me they require serious listening and preferably a dedicated room. When I heard the Maggie's, it was no contest. To me the 1.7s just made me want to enjoy the music. Soundstage and 'warmth' was very alluring. I will be putting the 1.7s in my living room and the acoustics are anything but ideal. And at the dealers where I heard the 1.7s, the room was more or less similar whereas the ATCs were in a dedicated room. I will definitely be picking up a pair of 1.7s and perhaps in the future find some place for the ATCs unless the ls50 are exceptional

 

RE: 1.7i's verses LS 50's and KEF Blades...long..., posted on November 1, 2015 at 07:39:37
Mark Man
Audiophile

Posts: 1079
Location: MN
Joined: January 31, 2010






My friend who bought the 1.7i's ran them 24/7 until they had about 300+hours on them...then they really opened up...so there is some break-in required...

I can see the LS 50's in smaller room with a decent tube front end sounding very good...when I heard them with the Marantz front end, in a very big room...they were very thin...they have a hyper detail quality, similar to Wilson or Magico...IMHO...Hence the tube front end for LS 50's to warm them up...

Now, back to the 1.7's...the 1.7i's, IMHO are a much better speaker than the original 1.7's...I went from the 3.7's and upgraded to the 3.7i's doing the Maggie upgrade for $500...best money I ever spent...I live 20 minutes from the Magnepan factory so I had no shipping you can search my Moniker and I have written much about this...

You cannot upgrade the 1.7's to the (i's)...so if you are listening at a dealers I am guessing you are listening to the 1.7i's if they are new...but I would double check, because the I's are worth it...

The guys on this board are very generous with their knowledge and experiences. I have learned allot about Maggies and placement and front ends that work well on this board...having a bigger living room at some point you may want to add a sub...same friend bought the REL S3 and it blends seamlessly with the Maggies...I also wrote something up on that sub...

Bang for the buck, the 1.7's are truly an impressive speaker. There are many possibilities on placement...you can really change the musical presentation by just moving them around...(tweeters in or tweeters out) is a big one...but giving them room to breath behind them, IMHO is very important to get the magical imaging and sound stage...

I do not know if this is possible in your room, But Sadie on this board turned may of us on to the HK/Limage speaker placement if you have a shoe-box room and are playing farfield...

My 3.7i's are 8'-10" off the front wall and 13" from the side walls...the room is 12'-8" wide and 20'+/- and I sit 10'-10" from speaker to ears...Basically the HK/Limage set-up is 40%-60% into the room, tweeters in and no toe in...this set-up is a room coupling set-up...see attached link...

Also the link to the Cardas dipole calculator that works very well for a starting point for speaker placement...with minimal fine tuning...

http://www.cardas.com/room_setup_calculators.php

Good luck, keep us posted, enjoy the music and if you are buying new make sure you are getting 1.7i's they are worth buying new...
Thanks
Mark

I wanted to delete the second picture, but did not know how...the first pic shows the Mye Audio Stands, which are great and that I elevated them a little, which I like...the first pic the subs are gone...could not get them to blend with the 3.7i's...do not miss them at all and condo living, my neighbors appreciate the subs are gone...

 

RE: 1.7i's verses LS 50's and KEF Blades...long..., posted on November 1, 2015 at 08:10:15
volumezero
Audiophile

Posts: 95
Location: BKK
Joined: July 7, 2004
Very nice setup and thanks for your valuable input. The dealer also recommended 10' from the front walls so I have to remeasure my room to see if I have enough space. For subs, I'm thinking of Jl audio e112 which I'll be picking up in a couple days.

Yes I'll be picking up the 1.7i.... But at this point I'm thinking whether I should go for the 3.7i instead since my room is pretty big.... But then again I've never owned a pair of magnepans so I guess trying out the 1.7s first then if I really like the sound I can trade them for the 3.7s.

Thanks again

 

RE: 1.7i's verses LS 50's and KEF Blades...long..., posted on November 1, 2015 at 08:21:38
Mark Man
Audiophile

Posts: 1079
Location: MN
Joined: January 31, 2010
thanks for the kind words...

The 3.7i's with the true ribbon tweeter are really nice, but also 3X the cost of the 1.7i's...if you have a good dealer, he would take the 1.7i's in on a trade up no problem...or selling them locally on Craig's list also no problem...I just hate all the tire kickers on Craig's list and all the low ball offers, but they will sell...just price them more than what you want so you can come down and they feel they are getting a deal, IMHO..

I do think the 1.7i's are a great starting point...you can always move up...

The whole placement thing, for me is actually pretty fun...the info I posted are just two methods that I found worked for me...

good luck
thanks
Mark

keep us posted...

 

Page processed in 0.030 seconds.