Lundahl LL1941 vs LL1943

I have listened to the LL1931 compared to the LL1941, which is the closest thing without being the thing you ask.

The amorphous core MC transformers (LL1931, LL1941) give the most clearly heard detail of the two, where small performance details are heard most distinctly. The mu-metal core MC transformers (LL1933, LL1943) provide a broader brush with regard to details, but do so with somewhat more upper bass/lower midrange warmth.

I find that I can live nicely with either of these, but gravitate toward the amorphous core transformers, primarily because I want the detail and already have a nicely balanced system not in need of more warmth.

Kevin Carter
K&K Audio
www.kandkaudio.com

RE: Lundahl LL1941 vs LL1943, posted on January 1, 2015 at 02:17:25
Cos Audiophile Posts: 2 Joined: January 1, 2015	Kevin, did you also had a chance to compare the performance of LL1931 with LL1941 at different ratios, namely 1:16. I will be using this ratio in my system. Best regards, Cos

RE: Lundahl LL1941 vs LL1943, posted on January 1, 2015 at 07:22:11
KevinC Manufacturer Posts: 2984 Location: NC Joined: April 19, 2001	Your subject and text use different part numbers. which did you intend to ask about? Kevin Carter K&K Audio www.kandkaudio.com

RE: Lundahl LL1941 vs LL1943, posted on January 1, 2015 at 15:11:01
Cos Audiophile Posts: 2 Joined: January 1, 2015	I am interested in comparison between LL1931 and LL1941 at 1:16 ratio.

RE: Lundahl LL1941 vs LL1943, posted on January 1, 2015 at 16:27:49
KevinC Manufacturer Posts: 2984 Location: NC Joined: April 19, 2001	They sound the same to me connected for the same ratio. Kevin Carter K&K Audio www.kandkaudio.com

K&K Audio / Lundahl Transformers

Lundahl LL1941 vs LL1943

92.244.132.44