High Efficiency Speaker Asylum

Need speakers that can rock with just one watt? You found da place.

Return to High Efficiency Speaker Asylum


Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded

couldn't resist

75.69.134.146

Posted on October 7, 2016 at 05:47:23
mhardy6647
Audiophile

Posts: 16018
Location: New England
Joined: October 12, 1999
Contributor
  Since:
October 23, 2016
:-)


DSC_6117

Thoughts? Comments? Suggestions?

DSC_6121a

As an aside: Why the fug is it that no two hifi components have the same type of connectors on 'em? These utterly massive and (otherwise) beautifully made JBL drivers have little spring-loaded connectors that would have looked at home on a mid-1970s Radio Shack 'monkey coffin'. Thus the strategically installed nails and cliplead (OFC, cryo-treated, but of course!) adaptors.

DSC_6122





all the best,
mrh

 

Hide full thread outline!
    ...
RE: couldn't resist, posted on October 7, 2016 at 07:16:37
kyle
Audiophile

Posts: 1839
Location: London Ontario
Joined: September 29, 1999
If your 604s were 8Gs they would have the same connectors as the JBLs. Altec went with the same connector type on most of their speakers in the 70s.
One leg of your spades might fit in the spring connector as will bare wire.

 

they're 604Es and the lug is too big, posted on October 7, 2016 at 17:00:24
mhardy6647
Audiophile

Posts: 16018
Location: New England
Joined: October 12, 1999
Contributor
  Since:
October 23, 2016
plus,the wire from the XO/L-pad is a little too short. Oops!

Thanks for the suggestion and information, though.
all the best,
mrh

 

RE: they're 604Es and the lug is too big, posted on October 7, 2016 at 21:31:19
kyle
Audiophile

Posts: 1839
Location: London Ontario
Joined: September 29, 1999
I knew you have Es and I've seen you're pic of the CAT5 wires.
You could spring for another 3 foot pair without ends. It could set you back 2 or 3 bucks.

 

RE: couldn't resist, posted on October 7, 2016 at 22:08:57
mah
Audiophile

Posts: 87
Joined: May 26, 2008
Altec and JBL knew what they were doing. Their products had to perform up to their specs and be reliable in all sorts of environments. Those connectors are proven and more than adequate for domestic use.

 

The XOs are hardwired, posted on October 8, 2016 at 04:56:34
mhardy6647
Audiophile

Posts: 16018
Location: New England
Joined: October 12, 1999
Contributor
  Since:
October 23, 2016
so, yeah, I could -- but it's just an experiment.

all the best,
mrh

 

RE: couldn't resist, posted on October 8, 2016 at 08:55:58
moray james
Manufacturer

Posts: 1599
Location: Calgary on the Bow
Joined: May 19, 2002
so have you had a listen yet? Do you plan to disconnect your 604 tweeters and run these for a while? moray james.
moray james

 

I shall try that anon, posted on October 8, 2016 at 17:18:04
mhardy6647
Audiophile

Posts: 16018
Location: New England
Joined: October 12, 1999
Contributor
  Since:
October 23, 2016
not sure that losing the coaxial treble unit is a good idea, though.

Won't stop me from giving it a whirl, though.

all the best,
mrh

 

RE: I shall try that anon, posted on October 8, 2016 at 18:28:37
moray james
Manufacturer

Posts: 1599
Location: Calgary on the Bow
Joined: May 19, 2002

Why no? Looks like a fine driver and horn, you can time align the compression and the 604 woofer diaphragm. Might surprise you. Have fun thanks for posting always enjoy looking at gear in your room.
moray james

 

RE: couldn't resist, posted on October 11, 2016 at 11:50:39
Crazy Dave
Audiophile

Posts: 14371
Location: East Coast
Joined: October 4, 2001
There was a Pioneer speaker that had a copy of the Altec coax and a horn mid like that. The crossed the woofer to the horn mid, then to the tweeter in the coax. I would imagine that the drivers operated very "pistonically" in this configuration.

Dave

 

oops, an apology is in order, posted on October 13, 2016 at 14:22:05
mhardy6647
Audiophile

Posts: 16018
Location: New England
Joined: October 12, 1999
Contributor
  Since:
October 23, 2016
the lugs do fit in the spring-loaded JBL terminals.

D'oh.

Sorry.

all the best,
mrh

 

Page processed in 0.027 seconds.