General Asylum

General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories.

Return to General Asylum


Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded

Acoustat 2+2

24.211.142.218

Posted on October 27, 2016 at 14:02:22
jwidgren
Audiophile

Posts: 5
Location: Mid Atlantic
Joined: March 29, 2016
I've been playing around with my Acoustat 2+2's after a long hiatus from listening today and tried to confirm a trick I've used in the past. I put a 2" thick book under the rear edge of each base so that the panels are tipping down toward my listening position. Every time I do this the music focus just seems to snap right into place - dramatically better. Yet, I've never seen this mentioned anywhere in the >25 years I've owned these. Has anybody else tried this? comments? also I find the interfaces now have a low level hum to them when plugged in; any ideas on how to squelch this noise? (I assume it's the bias transformers, but??)
Si vis pacem, para bellum

 

Hide full thread outline!
     FYI - E-Stat 14:33:58 10/27/16 (1)
       RE: FYI - jwidgren 08:16:53 10/28/16 (0)
     RE: Acoustat 2+2 - slapshot 14:20:53 10/27/16 (1)
    ...
RE: Acoustat 2+2, posted on October 27, 2016 at 14:20:53
slapshot
Audiophile

Posts: 2248
Joined: January 9, 2006
Depending on the stands, many Maggie owners could play with the vertical tilt of the panels, and this has been well discussed (at least in the past) in the Planar Asylum.

 

FYI, posted on October 27, 2016 at 14:33:58
E-Stat
Audiophile

Posts: 37634
Joined: May 12, 2000
Contributor
  Since:
April 5, 2002
There's a forum devoted to planar speakers where you'll get more specific feedback. Click here to get there.

I owned 2+2s for twenty some years and now run 1+1s in the HT. I find tilt back or tilt forward useful for *short* panels, but since these are nearly eight feet tall, you've got a floor to ceiling line source.

I did find, however, that precise - and I mean laser pointer and string from each speaker to listening position focused precise - placement was critical for optimal imaging with the 2+2. The 1+1s are less sensitive to extreme beaming with their narrower format.

If both interfaces share the same hum, you may have a ground loop in your system. On the other other, if the interfaces have never been touched in twenty five years, they could likely do with some TLC. I replaced the original Monster cable in mine which had oxidized horribly to the detriment of the sound, especially at the top. I also bypassed the signal fuse as well. Replacing the socks with thin spandex yields another beneficial improvement.

If you need service, I can heartily recommend Roy Esposito who was an Acoustat employee back in the day. He rebuilt the interfaces in my 1+1s and added his "air" mod.

 

RE: FYI, posted on October 28, 2016 at 08:16:53
jwidgren
Audiophile

Posts: 5
Location: Mid Atlantic
Joined: March 29, 2016
Thanks for the tips! - I may indeed be fighting ground loops and will start a process to verfiy that and hopefully find a safe solution. It seems very possible, since I have my power amps on the opposite side of the room and powered from a different AC breaker circuit. After that I will take the interfaces out on the bench and go over them from top to bottom, as you suggest. My hypothesis is that by tilting the speakers forward there is less destructive interference from the longer paths at the top of the panels to the same points about 4' lower (my ears). I can picture a test set-up to measure the maximum delay of this time "smear", but from simple geometry is should be on the order of ~ 1ms. I may build a new, more massive base for the 2+2's that will allow me to easily adjust the tilt at will.
Si vis pacem, para bellum

 

RE: Acoustat 2+2, posted on October 28, 2016 at 08:17:56
jwidgren
Audiophile

Posts: 5
Location: Mid Atlantic
Joined: March 29, 2016
I'll go back and search in the planars thread - thanks!
Si vis pacem, para bellum

 

Page processed in 0.023 seconds.