General Asylum

General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories.

Return to General Asylum


Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded

OP Amps, Whats Your Opinion?

97.117.136.151

Posted on June 24, 2015 at 09:48:49
AudioSoul
Audiophile

Posts: 4594
Location: north central AZ
Joined: July 9, 2005

They are in all but the most expensive audio equipment now. I know at first they were taboo. Has their technology improved? I am considering a new integrated amp and I want the best sound I can get.

 

Hide full thread outline!
    ...
RE: OP Amps, Whats Your Opinion?, posted on June 24, 2015 at 10:02:08
If you want any even half-way reasonable/informative replies, post your question in the "Amp/preamp" asylum, or at the diyaudio.com forum.

:)

 

RE: OP Amps, Whats Your Opinion?, posted on June 24, 2015 at 10:19:42
b.l.zeebub
Audiophile

Posts: 9361
Location: 52deg 28'N,1deg56'W
Joined: April 17, 2006
Since the bad old days of TLO72 and LF353 opamps have advanced beyond all recognition.

These days good opamps are far better than what is possible to achieve using discrete components.

Problem is the only way to find out which ones are inside is by opening the amp.
Don't know of many retailers who let you do that.

 

RE: OP Amps, Whats Your Opinion?, posted on June 24, 2015 at 10:27:36
rick_m
Audiophile

Posts: 6230
Location: Oregon
Joined: August 11, 2005
You really can't generalize. Sorry.

Op Amps have gotten better and also more specialized so that helps. Implementation still rules however so it really boils down to the goals and competance of the designer.

I can tell you how to do some tests if you have a scope and Fn generator that can sort out some issues, but the real bottom line for just about all of us is to listen. If it sounds good in your system, you're in business. If it sounds bad, well that's interesting but try to find something that doesn't if you can. If most everything sounds off in your system you need to try to figure out why. It can be surprising sometimes...

As far as audiophiles making pronouncements from on high concerning the "sound" of this or that technology or part, take it with a grain of salt. Ask yourself 'how do they know where the problem really lays?' How do they know it's just one problem?

To thine own ears be true...

Rick

 

RE: OP Amps, Whats Your Opinion?, posted on June 24, 2015 at 10:52:26
mkuller
Audiophile

Posts: 38130
Location: SF Bay Area
Joined: April 22, 2003
...they have improved but still it's the end sound of the component that really matters more than what's inside.

 

RE: OP Amps, Whats Your Opinion?, posted on June 24, 2015 at 12:26:58
"...they have improved but still it's the end sound of the component that really matters "

How have they improved? Do you know about this stuff?

Our good friend John Curl can talk with you all day long (trust me) about opamps and other electronic gremlins.

For another discussion about them, go to the diyaudio 'lounge'.

:)

 

RE: OP Amps, Whats Your Opinion?, posted on June 24, 2015 at 12:32:09
unclestu
Dealer

Posts: 5851
Joined: April 13, 2010
Unfortunately opamps have drfifted to SMD technology ( Surface mount), For cerain application they are perfectly fine, In fact Rowland Research use LS opamps for his amps (at least at one time) claiming that their distortion specs are lower than what he could achieve with discrete components.

The issue I have with many opamps is that the traces are miniscule and thus ultimate dynamics often suffer as a result. That can occur with even opamp volume controls, which sometimes overload given a high input. I'm sure designers are working to alleviate this issue, but I remain a bit skeptical.

 

Much better for sure, posted on June 24, 2015 at 13:16:18
E-Stat
Audiophile

Posts: 37639
Joined: May 12, 2000
Contributor
  Since:
April 5, 2002
but are still innately complex designs using lots of NFB.

There is no surprise to me that the best gear in my experience continues to use discrete components - be they triodes or JFETs.

 

RE: OP Amps, Whats Your Opinion?, posted on June 24, 2015 at 14:08:47
jedrider
Audiophile

Posts: 15167
Location: No. California
Joined: December 26, 2003
There are a bunch of op-amps that are really considered good. I think that using op-amps is hard to avoid unless the designer is very clever.

There is a phono stage, for instance, that has a discrete MC input and I am wondering whether it will be better than my current phono stage that uses op-amps exclusively, and ones that are not even noteworthy?

I think you have to listen to the gear to decide.

 

RE: OP Amps, Whats Your Opinion?, posted on June 24, 2015 at 14:38:39
mkuller
Audiophile

Posts: 38130
Location: SF Bay Area
Joined: April 22, 2003
...I have talked to my friend John about them before.

Does he use any in Parasound products?

I'll bet he does.

Cost no object - that's a different story.

 

RE: OP Amps, Whats Your Opinion?, posted on June 24, 2015 at 15:19:55
TWB2
Dealer

Posts: 316
Location: N. California
Joined: July 10, 2004
"These days good opamps are far better than what is possible to achieve using discrete components."

Really?? I think not.

You simply don't find them in the best gear.

 

Very true, posted on June 24, 2015 at 17:01:29
E-Stat
Audiophile

Posts: 37639
Joined: May 12, 2000
Contributor
  Since:
April 5, 2002
I think that using op-amps is hard to avoid unless the designer is very clever.

Audio Research uses them in the mute timer circuit. Ironically, that is the only thing that has ever failed with my twenty year old SP9 MKIII.

 

RE: OP Amps, Whats Your Opinion?, posted on June 24, 2015 at 17:05:33
huubdas
Audiophile

Posts: 138
Joined: August 30, 2009
All opamps work in Class B with heavy negatve feedback [ transient intermodulation distortion ] to compensate crossover distortion and because many stages to reduce noise.
You only hear this after a while, listening fatigue.
But all this is masqued by solid state amp's (class B or AB), CD and other digital sources.
In an all valve setup with non-digital vinyl there is no place for opamp's, keep it pure I would say.

With modern manipulated CD's , solid state amp's, radio, internetsources an opamp more or less is not relevant. HIGH FIDELITY is long gone, that's why merchandisers say: REAL DIGITAL QUALITY, STEREO SOUND, etc. Nobody say's HIFI anymore because it is not HIFI. Real HIFI stopped with digital, solidstate amp's, miniboxes,midiboxes, yes, even stereo imho.

 

RE: OP Amps, Whats Your Opinion?, posted on June 24, 2015 at 17:46:22
risabet
Audiophile

Posts: 3197
Location: SoCal
Joined: January 10, 2005
The phono section in my pre-amp is an op-amp based unit. It has been replaced with a discrete, tube-based unit and the difference is night and day, with the discrete circuit sounding much better. Though this is comparing apples to oranges, I think that op-amps are still more limited sonically than discrete circuits, ceteris paribus!



Science is the great antidote to the poison of enthusiasm and superstition.

Adam Smith

 

RE: Very true, posted on June 24, 2015 at 18:04:00
MikeCh
Audiophile

Posts: 1113
Joined: November 16, 2002
You can't hardly compare a LM555 digital timer in a standard SOIC package to an analog opamp. I guess you could... if you have no clue about what you're talking about.

Personally, I've never had an opamp fail and I've used a lot of them. OTOH, I've owned a number of high-end preamps that don't use opamps fail.

Regardless, this has nothing to do with the OP's query.

 

RE: Very true, posted on June 24, 2015 at 18:11:42
E-Stat
Audiophile

Posts: 37639
Joined: May 12, 2000
Contributor
  Since:
April 5, 2002
I've owned a number of high-end preamps that don't use opamps fail.

Sorry to hear that. I cannot relate.

Regardless, this has nothing to do with the OP's query.

Sure it does. Op amps do have their place. :)

 

RE: OP Amps, Whats Your Opinion?, posted on June 24, 2015 at 18:15:57
MikeCh
Audiophile

Posts: 1113
Joined: November 16, 2002
>> All opamps work in class B.

Really?

It's quite easy to bias an opamp to operate in class-A operation. One of many threads on the topic: http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/media-arts-and-sciences/mas-836-sensor-technologies-for-interactive-environments-spring-2011/readings/MITMAS_836S11_read02_bias.pdf

 

RE: OP Amps, Whats Your Opinion?, posted on June 24, 2015 at 18:58:38
AbeCollins
Audiophile

Posts: 46291
Location: USA
Joined: June 22, 2001
Contributor
  Since:
February 2, 2002
Like anything else, it depends on the designer's skill in implementation. There are crappy sounding op-amp based products like there are crappy sounding products that use all discrete components.... and the other way around.

One of the best sounding phono stages I've had in my system used op-amps, high speed op-amps to be more precise, sometimes used as video amplifiers. It was the Graham Slee Era Gold V MM phono based on the Analog Devices AD817 op-amp.

My Cambridge 640p phono used op-amps and it sounded pretty mediocre. Go figure.




 

RE: OP Amps, Whats Your Opinion?, posted on June 24, 2015 at 19:15:32
huubdas
Audiophile

Posts: 138
Joined: August 30, 2009
Yes, isn't that proof that opamps suck ? Doesn't help much.

And: what does that help the general musiclovers who trustfully and innocent buy their gear ? Technicians/hifi people know their way, does one have to be a thorough electronics expert to finally enjoy favorite music ?

Opamps are great building blocks for computers, phones, TV, telecom, medical gear but not for HIFI. Digital is for convenience, not for music. Stereo is an annoying special effect and so on, don't break my mouth open.

 

an operational amplifier doesn't need to be on a chip., posted on June 24, 2015 at 19:23:36
Timbo in Oz
Audiophile

Posts: 23221
Location: Canberra - in the ACT - SE Australia
Joined: January 30, 2002
Indeed you can build an operational amplifier with valves.

There are a lot of potentially very good (op-amp) chips available now and for at least two decades.

Most need real attention to their grounding, heat sinking and Power supply arrangements as do everything else.

Even if you did mostly listen to simple stereo recordings and not to multiple mono-mike pop mix-downs the sound you hear has passed through quite a few op-amps. And if you are a typical audiophile, hundreds of them, over and over.








Warmest

Tim Bailey

Skeptical Measurer & Audio Scrounger


 

RE: OP Amps, Whats Your Opinion?, posted on June 24, 2015 at 19:30:18
huubdas
Audiophile

Posts: 138
Joined: August 30, 2009
Audio, phonopre is the most simple amp there is, little amp with RIAA correction, 6dB/oct. Worth 3 dollar material, mostly the casing.

Many so called Super High End manufacturers take benefit of those glossy magazine readers who think they buy something space age special.

A big con the audio industry. They only want your wallet and what's in it.

 

RE: OP Amps, Whats Your Opinion?, posted on June 24, 2015 at 19:49:38
MikeCh
Audiophile

Posts: 1113
Joined: November 16, 2002
Maybe it's time to get out and listen to some new gear? Be sure to pick up one of these first and use it before doing so.

Your opinion is fairly misconceived, although very stereo-audiophile-typical.

 

RE: OP Amps, Whats Your Opinion?, posted on June 24, 2015 at 20:03:47
I can't comment on that, 'cause I know almost nothing about circuit design.

Ask me about recording techniques or psychoacoustics, and we can talk. I got that down - more or less.

:)

 

Organ meats, the peasants used to eat them....., posted on June 24, 2015 at 20:11:11
yet greats chefs elevate them to the highest culinary standards. Sometimes, it's not what ingredients are used, as long as they are fresh and the chef has an overarching talent.

 

Nice name dropping there..., posted on June 24, 2015 at 22:12:18
PaulN
Audiophile

Posts: 1412
Joined: January 13, 2000
In most JC designs beyond the basic price-points, an opamp used as a DC servo to mitigate offset. He favors discrete gain stages. Though if you know Curl, you know he actually prefers tubes and always has.

 

And, just like modernist cuisine..., posted on June 24, 2015 at 22:16:41
PaulN
Audiophile

Posts: 1412
Joined: January 13, 2000
the sheeple run in the fields like it's May Day when the trend is announced from the jolly press; i.e., 47 Labs.

 

too many transistors and too much negative feedback, posted on June 25, 2015 at 02:46:54
morricab
Distributor or Rep

Posts: 9178
Location: switzerland
Joined: April 1, 2005
No matter what you do with them you cannot get around these fundamental limitations and in the best of cases they sound ok and in the worst they are the worst.

 

RE: silly question: any variation in quality of transistors? [n.t.a.], posted on June 25, 2015 at 03:11:28
wangmr
Audiophile

Posts: 2410
Location: Downtown
Joined: November 29, 2012
.

 

RE: silly question: any variation in quality of transistors? [n.t.a.], posted on June 25, 2015 at 05:45:51
morricab
Distributor or Rep

Posts: 9178
Location: switzerland
Joined: April 1, 2005
For discrete transistors I am sure that there is some quality differences although i would not know which ones are good and which ones are not.

For opamps, it is usually specific manufacturer for a given opamp so if you have specific needs then there is likely not much choice in the chip you buy. A couple of companies now are making what they call "discrete" opamps, which are not using miniaturized transistors all on a die but normal small signal transistors that are arranged like an opamp circuit. I think Burson makes one of the more popular disrete opamps.

 

RE: OP Amps, Whats Your Opinion?, posted on June 25, 2015 at 06:29:01
AbeCollins
Audiophile

Posts: 46291
Location: USA
Joined: June 22, 2001
Contributor
  Since:
February 2, 2002

True. But it goes to show what can be done with an inexpensive component in the hands of a good designer. The Graham Slee Era Gold V is a highly regarded phono.... as is the vacuum tube Aesthetix Rhea at 5x the price. Yet I preferred the sound of Graham Slee, op-amps and all.

 

Why not ask John Curl? (video), posted on June 25, 2015 at 06:56:02
I'm not sure op amps are addressed, but this is classic John Curl talking amps and various other topics as well. Worth watching.

 

RE: appreciate the respectful answer [n.t.a.], posted on June 25, 2015 at 07:48:51
wangmr
Audiophile

Posts: 2410
Location: Downtown
Joined: November 29, 2012
.

 

Yep, I believe Curl has said on AA that he designs ss circuits because..... , posted on June 25, 2015 at 08:56:13
there's more possibility for innovation - NOT because he prefers the sound of ss.

 

RE: OP Amps, Whats Your Opinion?, posted on June 25, 2015 at 09:10:03
Palustris
Audiophile

Posts: 2408
Location: Cape Cod
Joined: September 12, 2008
"phonopre is the most simple amp there is,"

A phono preamp that is well designed is the MOST difficult amplifier to engineer. Anyone can put together a simple filter with a 6dB/ octave slope, however that filter would not be close to the the RIAA curve. Further, it takes a real engineer design a circuit that is consistent in manufacturing and that does not degrade as the components age. Many in the DIY community build all sorts of power amps and preamps before tackling a phono stage. Anyone who believes that it is simple doesn't understand the process or the engineering.

 

RE: OP Amps, Whats Your Opinion?, posted on June 25, 2015 at 09:43:37
huubdas
Audiophile

Posts: 138
Joined: August 30, 2009
No, you're wrong, I'm no audiophile or something weird like that.

I am a music lover and just ventilating my hangup's regarding bad sound.

Grown up with analogue and valves, until now. All "new" things sucked, stereo, solid state, quadro, digital, multichannel, you obviously defend new things because you paid lots of money, I understand, once I dreamed to, but now I see clear.

 

RE: OP Amps, Whats Your Opinion?, posted on June 25, 2015 at 09:52:32
huubdas
Audiophile

Posts: 138
Joined: August 30, 2009
RIAA slopes are 6 dB/oct with 2 crossoverpoints, more sophisticated rolloffs at 50 and 10 kHz.
Simple, 2 12AX7 triodes per channel, you are talking about VOODOO, victim of the audio accessoires for fancy prices.
I bet you use loudspeakercables 20 mm (1 inch) thick, gold plated, copper/silver alloy, 400 Dollar per meter. That is oke, good for economics.

 

RE: OP Amps, Whats Your Opinion?, posted on June 25, 2015 at 10:27:25
Todd Krieger
Audiophile

Posts: 37333
Location: SW United States
Joined: November 2, 2000
Op-amps take some of the guesswork out of amplifier design.... Although the ultimate designs are with discrete components, one must really know what he's doing in order for his discrete design to demonstrably outperform a competent one using op-amps. And it's too easy to mess up a discrete design to where it won't outperform op-amps.

 

RE: an operational amplifier doesn't need to be on a chip., posted on June 25, 2015 at 10:41:57
Alpha Al
Industry Professional

Posts: 2958
Location: N. Carolina
Joined: February 16, 2004
Contributor
  Since:
December 3, 2015




That is true. Philbreck made op amp modules that used a pair of 12AX7's.

 

Although the..., posted on June 25, 2015 at 11:01:33
mkuller
Audiophile

Posts: 38130
Location: SF Bay Area
Joined: April 22, 2003
...Vendetta Research head-amp I bought from him used j-fets.

And I believe he uses the same in his Blowtorch preamp design.

 

RE: Nice name dropping there..., posted on June 25, 2015 at 14:33:17
Oh please. If nobody can ever mention a person's name, then everything said here means nothing.

I had lunch with John Hilliard, and he said...
I took lessons with Pierre Thibaud, and he said...
I talked with Bob Ludwig, and he said...
I had drinks with Linda Ronstadt.
I played craps with Madonna in Vegas.

Eschewing "name-dropping" is overrated. Everybody who's not a moron and has been outside their home during their adult life has spent some time with someone who is "famous".

It makes no sense to ridicule/berate someone who mentions someone's name, other than out of petty envy.

:)

 

RE: OP Amps, Whats Your Opinion?, posted on June 25, 2015 at 14:47:11
Caucasian Blackplate
Industry Professional

Posts: 8313
Location: Seattle
Joined: June 18, 2004
They are best avoided. There are plenty of linestage options without them. (Just about every tube preamp available on the market)

 

What is an op-amp?, posted on June 25, 2015 at 15:47:55
Posts: 2799
Location: Orange Co., Ca
Joined: September 19, 2001
Let's take a step back for a second.
An Op-Amp has, by definition, very high gain and it is used with large amounts of feedback such that the closed-loop performance is determined by the passive feedback components and not the components within the op-amp.

So, if you don't like using lots of negative feedback don't use an op-amp. Simple.

Regarding too many transistors - this is an irrelevance considering the first point. A monolithic op-amp will use as many transistors as necessary to achieve high gain and whatever specs that are important. In open-loop terms any op-amp is very non-linear so using less transistors won't make it less 'bad'. This leads me to the topic of 'discrete op-amps' which, IMHO, is an oxymoron. Such a circuit may be justified to drive unusual loads but there is no justification on gain terms. If it is an op-amp it should have high gain and using discrete transistors to produce that gain does not make it more 'good'. One the other hand, if you want a moderate open-loop gain amplifier to use with a little feedback (in the style of a Nelson Pass power amp) then you probably have to design your own - but that isn't really an op-amp.

Regards
13DoW

 

Completely agree, posted on June 25, 2015 at 17:00:44
E-Stat
Audiophile

Posts: 37639
Joined: May 12, 2000
Contributor
  Since:
April 5, 2002
So, if you don't like using lots of negative feedback don't use an op-amp. Simple.

Regarding too many transistors...A monolithic op-amp will use as many transistors as necessary to achieve high gain and whatever specs that are important.


This is what both Brad and I have observed and why we're not fans of that approach.

 

Thanks..., posted on June 25, 2015 at 18:28:50
mkuller
Audiophile

Posts: 38130
Location: SF Bay Area
Joined: April 22, 2003
...excellent talk but he doesn't mention them.

 

RE: Thanks..., posted on June 25, 2015 at 22:03:00
I'm about an hour into the 1.5 hour video, and, yeah, he hasn't mentioned opamps yet. Still, even you might have learned something by this point.

John is clearly not in his element when speaking contemporaniously in public, but don't let that distract you from what he's teaching you.

:)

 

" They are in all but the most expensive audio equipment now ", posted on June 26, 2015 at 01:16:48
beppe61
Audiophile

Posts: 4705
Joined: January 29, 2004


Hi i would not call this cheap ... with an original price of 23,800 USD.
I do not know it is now out of production ... i guess its sound is still ok by the way.
Kind regards,
bg

 

RE: Thanks..., posted on June 26, 2015 at 09:54:53
mkuller
Audiophile

Posts: 38130
Location: SF Bay Area
Joined: April 22, 2003
...even me?

Then for you it must have been mind-blowing ;-)

 

RE: OP Amps, Whats Your Opinion?, posted on June 26, 2015 at 11:05:17
d

 

RE: What is an op-amp?, posted on June 26, 2015 at 12:47:05
morricab
Distributor or Rep

Posts: 9178
Location: switzerland
Joined: April 1, 2005
I guess my point was that you pile on non-linear transistors and then try to fix the mess with feedback you can get something that measures well but sonically...well hey I'll let you decide.

Simpler seems to be better even for transistors as Pass has come to discover.

Cheever and some others have found that the best sound gear is the one that is the most linear, open loop and that closed loop performance is largely irrelevant soncially.

 

LOL, posted on June 26, 2015 at 12:50:20
I hadn't watched that video for over a year so couldn't remember about whether or not op amps were mentioned. I personally would stay away from op amps. Discrete circuits/designs were the reason we paid more. So what happened? Can't tell me op amps got that much better. I'd have to hear it.

 

The video..., posted on June 26, 2015 at 13:56:50
mkuller
Audiophile

Posts: 38130
Location: SF Bay Area
Joined: April 22, 2003
...personally I have found few solid state amps I could live with for any length of time - there was something always irritating about them, a glare in the upper midrange or some sort of subtle distortion that bothers me.

So I have ended up with tubed amps and couldn't be happier.

One of the things Curl talks about in your video is the problem of 7th harmonic distortion with solid state amplifiers.

It's a problem they all have and he has had to overcome it in the design of Parasounds. He says it gives the amps and edgy, amusical sound and has to be avoided.

2nd and 3rd harmonic distortion are musical so they aren't much of a problem.

Any 7th, he says, no matter how little is a killer.

 

Obviously your hearing must still be intact, posted on June 26, 2015 at 19:17:15
What you describe is why I currently do not own a solid state amp and (I'm guessing) part of the reason there are so few women in high end audio. The glare can be brutal but most don't hear it unless their high frequency hearing is still intact.

 

Walker Reference Phono Amp, posted on June 27, 2015 at 06:18:00
TWR
Audiophile

Posts: 1346
Location: Tempe, Arizona
Joined: November 13, 2003
This $25k phono stage is op amp based. At least the original version I owned about 15 years ago was. Sounded pretty good to me.

I currently have a Lounge Audio op amp based phono stage ($300) that sounds very good.

Ron Sutherland is another great designer who uses op amps in his products.

My point is that op amp based designs, cheap or expensive, can sound very good in the hands of a good designer.
Open up your mind, in pours the trash. - Meat Puppets, 1987

 

RE: Obviously your hearing must still be intact, posted on June 27, 2015 at 06:27:33
Even the A21 or the older HCA models?

I wonder if that's also why I never liked the Neumann KM84 and AKG C-451E microphones. They both have an edgey "brittle" sound (especially the KM84). (As condenser mics, they have an amplifier built into them.)

:)

 

RE: Obviously your hearing must still be intact, posted on June 27, 2015 at 08:56:29
"Even the A21 or the older HCA models?"

I never heard the older models. But I did review the JC-1. The JC-1 had bigger issues than just a brittle edge. And yes, I did discuss them with John Curl. In fairness, the amp I reviewed was an early version and I'm sure any issues have now been corrected.

My comments were not targeted at Parasound, but solid state in general based on my experience over the years.

 

That was about , posted on June 27, 2015 at 10:35:40
E-Stat
Audiophile

Posts: 37639
Joined: May 12, 2000
Contributor
  Since:
April 5, 2002
as tepid a review you'll find. He repeatedly pointed out what other SS and tube products do better.

 

Op amps were not mentioned -nt, posted on June 27, 2015 at 10:36:33
E-Stat
Audiophile

Posts: 37639
Joined: May 12, 2000
Contributor
  Since:
April 5, 2002
.

 

RE: Obviously your hearing must still be intact, posted on June 27, 2015 at 11:18:04
mkuller
Audiophile

Posts: 38130
Location: SF Bay Area
Joined: April 22, 2003
...nah I hear it in the upper midrange where your ears are more sensitive.

That's probably because my HF hearing rolls off around 12k.

 

The Gaincard sounded good ... , posted on June 28, 2015 at 01:54:43
beppe61
Audiophile

Posts: 4705
Joined: January 29, 2004
Hi
the Gaincard is built around one "power" op-amp per channel.
And it caused quite a stir when it came out for the high quality of sound.
Also the Jeff Rowland Concentra integrated is a parallel of many power op-amps and quite well received.
Never heard them by the way.
Kind regards,
bg

 

RE: That was about , posted on June 28, 2015 at 22:46:57
beppe61
Audiophile

Posts: 4705
Joined: January 29, 2004
Hi and i understand. Tepid maybe.
Nevertheless they placed it among the "Class A" units in 2013.
I have got another opinion that in one of the best sounding room at a Axpona show the 6010 was singing very fine with a analog tape source.


Kind regards,
bg

 

Page processed in 0.062 seconds.