General Asylum

General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories.

Return to General Asylum


Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded

The comment: "oh, they all sound about the same".....

219.76.144.52

Posted on January 20, 2015 at 06:54:51
wangmr
Audiophile

Posts: 2410
Location: Downtown
Joined: November 29, 2012
would apply best - or approximately - to what component?

thanks for interest.

roger wang

 

Hide full thread outline!
    ...
 It applies only to those who spout it ceaselessly (nt) - kerr 06:34:37 01/21/15 (0)
 RE: The comment: "oh, they all sound about the same"..... - fantja 04:13:28 01/21/15 (0)
 RE: The comment: "oh, they all sound about the same"..... - The Dill 19:59:35 01/20/15 (0)
 I take offense to that comment - 2chJunkie 17:05:39 01/20/15 (0)
 Without doubt it applies best to the individual making the comment.... - three_sox 15:37:53 01/20/15 (1)
     +1 nt - G Squared 19:21:11 01/20/15 (0)
 silicone diodes.......no wait - Awe-d-o-file 12:57:45 01/20/15 (3)  To all or to no components.... - Goober58 12:56:30 01/20/15 (0)
 RE: The comment: "oh, they all sound about the same"..... - dbphd 11:41:40 01/20/15 (0)
 Your posts? (nt) - mkuller 10:36:44 01/20/15 (4)  RE: The comment: "oh, they all sound about the same"..... - lord addleford 10:31:49 01/20/15 (0)
 RE: The comment: "oh, they all sound about the same"..... - Todd Krieger 08:48:23 01/20/15 (0)
 You must have taken lessons in 'how to ask' from Sudz. He never gave any answer either - Nuit 07:43:12 01/20/15 (8)  The McIntosh MA8000 - driver8 07:42:52 01/20/15 (0)
 RE: The comment: "oh, they all sound about the same"..... - genungo 07:19:49 01/20/15 (0)
 +1... nt - Dman 07:04:09 01/20/15 (0)
 The Audiophile! -nt - rick_m 06:58:08 01/20/15 (1)
The Audiophile! -nt, posted on January 20, 2015 at 06:58:08
rick_m
Audiophile

Posts: 6230
Location: Oregon
Joined: August 11, 2005
.

 

+1... nt, posted on January 20, 2015 at 07:04:09
Dman
Audiophile

Posts: 7211
Location: Kansas
Joined: January 28, 2001
nt

Dman
Analog Junkie

 

RE: The comment: "oh, they all sound about the same"....., posted on January 20, 2015 at 07:19:49
Digital components?

More so than analog components, at least...

 

The McIntosh MA8000, posted on January 20, 2015 at 07:42:52
driver8
Audiophile

Posts: 842
Location: Montreal
Joined: December 5, 2002
Sounds exactly the same as every McIntosh MA8000 I have heard.



 

You must have taken lessons in 'how to ask' from Sudz. He never gave any answer either, posted on January 20, 2015 at 07:43:12
So you ask a question, no commentary, just the question. And expect everyone else to entertain you?
Reads exactly the same a a typical Sudz query.
Now if you would have at least wrote why you ask.. Or some insight of your own. But no all you do is spew out something to 'churn the water'.
Gee I did not respond to your question? well I did. with exactly what I think of it too.
I did not know Sudz got a new moniker. LOL

 

RE: You must have taken lessons in 'how to ask' from Sudz. He never gave any answer either, posted on January 20, 2015 at 07:56:38
Amen. +1

Enough with the "I'm bored, so I'll ask".




 

good one lol... nt, posted on January 20, 2015 at 08:26:19
Green Lantern
Audiophile

Posts: 16952
Location: San Diego, Ca
Joined: November 12, 2002
Contributor
  Since:
June 17, 2003










 

RE: The comment: "oh, they all sound about the same"....., posted on January 20, 2015 at 08:48:23
Todd Krieger
Audiophile

Posts: 37333
Location: SW United States
Joined: November 2, 2000
"would apply best - or approximately - to what component?"

45 rpm adapters..........

 

RE: You must have taken lessons in 'how to ask' from Sudz. He never gave any answer either, posted on January 20, 2015 at 09:43:03
He's become the Asian Sudz, only even less articulate and more annoying!

Cheers,
Al

 

He receives 1/100 bitcoin for every reply..., posted on January 20, 2015 at 09:48:49
Steve O
Audiophile

Posts: 12364
Location: SE MI
Joined: September 6, 2001
...Helps with maintaining an up-to-date system in these tough economic times.

 

RE: The comment: "oh, they all sound about the same"....., posted on January 20, 2015 at 10:31:49
lord addleford
Audiophile

Posts: 1095
Location: new england
Joined: July 5, 2005
what a schmucky question?

 

Your posts? (nt), posted on January 20, 2015 at 10:36:44
mkuller
Audiophile

Posts: 38130
Location: SF Bay Area
Joined: April 22, 2003
(nt)

 

Ooops! Nt, posted on January 20, 2015 at 10:47:35
Nt

 

RE: The comment: "oh, they all sound about the same"....., posted on January 20, 2015 at 11:41:40
dbphd
Audiophile

Posts: 1674
Location: Montecito, CA
Joined: September 6, 2006
According to a group at AVS, everything except speakers. You will be castigated if you imply otherwise.

db

 

To all or to no components...., posted on January 20, 2015 at 12:56:30
depending on the definition of "about" as well as the ability of the listener to discern difference.

 

silicone diodes.......no wait, posted on January 20, 2015 at 12:57:45
Awe-d-o-file
Dealer

Posts: 21037
Location: 50 miles west of DC
Joined: January 10, 2004
selenium rectifiers.....no, cheap paper electrolytics. No, elliptical styli. When my royalty check comes I'm not going to buy any of those things.........I'm going to buy a boat

thanks Frank

E
T
ET

"If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking till you do suck seed" - Curly Howard 1936

 

ELLIPTICAL!? Where were you when conical was all the rage!? , posted on January 20, 2015 at 13:05:46
Dman
Audiophile

Posts: 7211
Location: Kansas
Joined: January 28, 2001
Maybe wangmr is really Julian Hirsch of Stereo Review!!! Didn't HE think all amps sound the same???

Dman
Analog Junkie

 

Where were you when conical was all the rage!? , posted on January 20, 2015 at 14:35:41
Awe-d-o-file
Dealer

Posts: 21037
Location: 50 miles west of DC
Joined: January 10, 2004
Let me see I think I was still a wee lad with a BSR that had a ceramic cart with a flip needle!


E
T
ET

"If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking till you do suck seed" - Curly Howard 1936

 

+1 :) -nt, posted on January 20, 2015 at 14:51:36
E-Stat
Audiophile

Posts: 37609
Joined: May 12, 2000
Contributor
  Since:
April 5, 2002
.

 

Without doubt it applies best to the individual making the comment...., posted on January 20, 2015 at 15:37:53
...Though somewhat paradoxically IMHO the biggest variable in audio reproduction is the individual listening to it.

 

I take offense to that comment, posted on January 20, 2015 at 17:05:39
2chJunkie
Audiophile

Posts: 1057
Joined: March 2, 2002



;-)

 

That's right! Can't diss the BSR. I hear Sudz loves em! nt, posted on January 20, 2015 at 17:47:07
Dman
Audiophile

Posts: 7211
Location: Kansas
Joined: January 28, 2001
nt

Dman
Analog Junkie

 

+1 nt, posted on January 20, 2015 at 19:21:11
G Squared
Audiophile

Posts: 8478
Location: Washington, DC Metro Area
Joined: November 16, 2004
Contributor
  Since:
May 23, 2023
Nt
Gsquared

 

RE: The comment: "oh, they all sound about the same"....., posted on January 20, 2015 at 19:59:35
The Dill
Audiophile

Posts: 2197
Location: Portland, Oregon
Joined: July 1, 2004
Contributor
  Since:
February 3, 2016
wangers questions ...

 

RE: The comment: "oh, they all sound about the same"....., posted on January 21, 2015 at 04:13:28
fantja
Audiophile

Posts: 15518
Location: Alabama
Joined: September 11, 2010
Most feel that cables/power cords fit into this catagory...

 

monotony..., posted on January 21, 2015 at 06:34:35
wangmr
Audiophile

Posts: 2410
Location: Downtown
Joined: November 29, 2012
is your postings in return (which don't say a thing on stated topic or didn't you see that?)

roger wang

 

It applies only to those who spout it ceaselessly (nt), posted on January 21, 2015 at 06:34:37
kerr
Audiophile

Posts: 4376
Location: Central Indiana
Joined: November 10, 2003
nt

 

The worst is trying to make combacks which just whine about the poster dissing your post LOL., posted on January 22, 2015 at 12:39:14
Sudz also originally was really bad at that, so he got hated even more than normal. He gradually got better, but by then it was too late. Way way too many disliked him.

When you own rebuttal was sent to "Whiner's Woad' You should have gotten a clue..
But, as usual, nope.. You try to make cracks at other people who made minor insults in your (or your posts) general direction.
Bad mistake.You should just take the whole thing with a 'grain of salt' and realize the way you wrote your post was a mistake, and remember to not make the same mistake again. And forget about it.
But, as is usual for a few members, that will be way too hard for you to remember.

 

RE: You must have taken lessons in 'how to ask' from Sudz. He never gave any answer either, posted on January 22, 2015 at 14:42:53
DanS
Audiophile

Posts: 313
Location: EL PASO, TEXAS
Joined: December 19, 2002
That is a racist comment!
Dan

 

RE: You must have taken lessons in 'how to ask' from Sudz. He never gave any answer either, posted on January 23, 2015 at 15:35:23
"That is a racist comment!"

DanS,
How do you figure that? Are you implying that mentioning the fact that Roger is Asian is somehow racist? Is bringing up the fact that (for example) Cayin electronics are Chinese a "racist comment"?

Some (many?) of us have been going back and forth (mostly in a good natured manner) with Roger Wang on the Asylum for quite a while. I see no reason to believe that mentioning that Roger is the "Asian Sudz" is a racist comment. Are you one of those chickenshit douchebags who sees racism in every utterance? Until you have something constructive to say just STFU. I don't need nor do I appreciate your mealy mouthed meddling.

Tread lightly,
Al

 

RE: too funny....., posted on January 26, 2015 at 08:13:11
wangmr
Audiophile

Posts: 2410
Location: Downtown
Joined: November 29, 2012
and i agree with you - no way does the original posting sound like coming from a racist. prejudice in other ways, surely, but not a racist-in-intent.

"treading heavily" is more fitting for a closing.

roger wang

 

How is it "prejudiced"?, posted on January 26, 2015 at 08:28:53
rlindsa
Audiophile

Posts: 7265
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Joined: October 5, 2004
Prejudiced means having an unfavorable opinion or feeling formed beforehand or without knowledge, thought, or reason. (dictionary.com)

It's a fact that you have posted some 2000 times and many of those posts are asking for opinions for which you rarely provide your own opinion. And it's also a fact that Sudz does much the same. So I don't think this particular post and the comparison to Sudz was "prejudiced" (i.e., judged without knowledge, thought or reason) - it was based on your and Sudz's posting history.

rlindsa

 

several faulty premises....., posted on January 26, 2015 at 08:52:31
wangmr
Audiophile

Posts: 2410
Location: Downtown
Joined: November 29, 2012
Rlindsa,
i don't how you're counting number of postings - whether in response to an original posting or not; i think that matters as they are two differing styles of nature (so to speak).

next, to align (?) me with mr. sudz is pretty stupid and probably stems from my *support* of his (right to) post. as i've said many times - not that it matters with english-langauge speakers and/or this A.A. board - if someone were to post the exact same posting as sudz (or maybe now me), you would never hear cries of troll or attention-getting or other denigrating reactions.

next, i'm very familiar with what prejudice means aside from the americanized meaning of ethnic groups and stereotyping them (obviously i'm not referring to that singular look at the meaning). prejudice as in pre-formed and pre-judgements - this is shown by my above observation (the same exact posting of a sudz or me under another moniker will not get the same negative down-look reaction).

last, it's also a prejudice (which I answered at least two times) that one is prejudiced against BY NOT GIVING HIS/HER OWN ANSWER when posting an original posting. i already answered why this should not be necessary (see what i wrote under my posting about what component sounds more or less the same to you - directly under it, i gave my own answer).

roger wang

 

RE: a thanks to all those responsible answerings [n.t.a.], posted on January 26, 2015 at 08:55:56
wangmr
Audiophile

Posts: 2410
Location: Downtown
Joined: November 29, 2012
.

 

RE: a thanks to all those responsible answerings [n.t.a.], posted on January 26, 2015 at 10:17:20
rlindsa
Audiophile

Posts: 7265
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Joined: October 5, 2004
Yes, I count 2 "responsible answerings", out of 35 responses.

rlindsa

 

RE: a thanks to all those responsible answerings [n.t.a.], posted on January 27, 2015 at 05:48:57
wangmr
Audiophile

Posts: 2410
Location: Downtown
Joined: November 29, 2012
why can't you learn to move on, instead on trailing after me even when i try to thank those who took the topic seriously (as it was meant).

roger wang

 

Page processed in 0.055 seconds.