Classical Court

From Perotin to Prokofiev (and beyond), performed by Caruso to Khatia, it's all here.

Return to Classical Court


Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded

A New Century/Cleveland Orch

76.214.238.65

Posted on November 11, 2020 at 08:37:35
oldmkvi
Audiophile

Posts: 10581
Joined: April 12, 2002
If there's a better sounding Orchestra today, I don't know what it could be!
The Beautiful Tone and Clarity of playing is fantastic!
I only wish it were in 24/96, like their other recent releases.
I'm sure every member of the Orchestra is aware of their Legacy, and they are certainly keeping it alive.
I hope they will have more releases over the next year!
You know, next year, the start of
Trump's Second Term...

 

Hide full thread outline!
    ...
Repertoire? [nt], posted on November 12, 2020 at 00:35:19
Posts: 26437
Location: SF Bay Area
Joined: February 17, 2004
Contributor
  Since:
February 6, 2012

 

RE: Repertoire? [nt], posted on November 12, 2020 at 00:59:30
Todd Krieger
Audiophile

Posts: 37333
Location: SW United States
Joined: November 2, 2000
It's a pricey three-CD set...... I don't find the music selections in this set particularly interesting...... (I would purchase the disc with the Prokofiev Three if it were marketed as a stand-alone CD.)

One of the pictures in the linked Amazon ad shows the music lineup in the set.

 

24/48 Download at Pro Studio Masters. No, posted on November 12, 2020 at 02:06:53
oldmkvi
Audiophile

Posts: 10581
Joined: April 12, 2002
CD s for me.
Strauss is beautiful.

 

RE: 24/48 Download at Pro Studio Masters. No, posted on November 12, 2020 at 02:34:31
Todd Krieger
Audiophile

Posts: 37333
Location: SW United States
Joined: November 2, 2000
I guess I could buy the 24/48 on that site (much better price), convert it to CD (I have an algorithm for this), and then burn a CD-R..... (Probably wouldn't sound as clean as the commercial CD.) I'll probably sample the music at a lower resolution (for free), and then decide which way to go.

 

RE: Repertoire? [nt], posted on November 12, 2020 at 07:57:23
oldmkvi
Audiophile

Posts: 10581
Joined: April 12, 2002



/

 

RE: Repertoire? [nt], posted on November 12, 2020 at 07:58:26
oldmkvi
Audiophile

Posts: 10581
Joined: April 12, 2002



/

 

Why No Recording Contracts for More American Orchestras?, posted on November 12, 2020 at 11:01:08
Mel
Audiophile

Posts: 2993
Location: New York City Area
Joined: February 21, 2001
Exceptions of course: Pittsburgh (RR), Minnesota (BIS), Boston (DG), Others?

San Francisco had to produce its own Mahler series. Anything since?

Others?

Yes, I know the volume is down generally.

Also self-financing (whether here or in Europe) usually means recorded performances. But recordings usually sound better when done in empty halls.

 

Ah - OK! Yes, I've had the Prokofiev and Strauss downloads for awhile [nt], posted on November 12, 2020 at 11:28:56
Posts: 26437
Location: SF Bay Area
Joined: February 17, 2004
Contributor
  Since:
February 6, 2012

 

Seattle too, posted on November 12, 2020 at 11:33:05
Posts: 26437
Location: SF Bay Area
Joined: February 17, 2004
Contributor
  Since:
February 6, 2012
BTW, I agree with you that "studio" recordings usually sound better than "in-concert" recordings.

Oh yeah - the Oregon Symphony has a few recordings on the Pentatone label - Houston too.

 

RE: Repertoire? [nt], posted on November 12, 2020 at 16:54:50
I liked the "plywood walls" acoustic Szell built better than the, admittedly gorgeous, recent re-build. MY system reflects (!) that. Likely says more about my ears.

 

RE: Seattle too, posted on November 12, 2020 at 20:26:49
Todd Krieger
Audiophile

Posts: 37333
Location: SW United States
Joined: November 2, 2000
One of my favorite recordings is Eugene Istomin performing Mozart Concertos 21 and 24 with Gerard Schwarz and the Seattle Symphony on Reference Recordings....... The 24 in particular is sublime.

 

Yes - I haven't heard it though, but I do love RR's engineering in general, posted on November 13, 2020 at 00:59:43
Posts: 26437
Location: SF Bay Area
Joined: February 17, 2004
Contributor
  Since:
February 6, 2012
Seattle's newer stuff (over the last few years) has been on their own label - I've had mixed results with their "own label" downloads. I'll try to listen to that Istomin recording, but I'm in the middle of going through the 60-disc "other" Living Stereo set, which contains some titles I didn't even remember, such as this recital by everybody's favorite virtuoso violinist (and rumored KGB officer!), Leonid Kogan:

(That reminds me that I once asked for and received the autograph of Lubomir Maly, the violist of the Prague Quartet and rumored agent of the Czech equivalent of the KGB. This was after they had played a concert at Stanford back in the 70's. Somehow, he didn't seem too excited about signing his name on my Prague Quartet album - after all, it could be used as incriminating evidence of fraternizing with the Americans - LOL!)

 

"plywood walls" , posted on November 13, 2020 at 11:46:46
pbarach
Audiophile

Posts: 3306
Location: Ohio
Joined: June 22, 2008
The plywood walls had a modernist appearance that didn't match the art deco style in the rest of the hall. They also caused the huge Aeolian Skinner organ to be walled off and not usable for decades.

The renovated hall has brought out the organ pipes so the organ can now be used. Also there is slightly longer reverb, which prevents the deafening overload that Severance used to have in big choral/orchestral works. Still, it's a relatively small hall (capacity 2000, vs. Boston Symphony Hall 2625, Disney Hall 2265, Davies 2700, Orchestra Hall Chicago 2500, Berlin Philharmonie 2440) that probably wouldn't "like" Mahler 8.

 

Anything since?, posted on November 13, 2020 at 14:28:40
Kal Rubinson
Reviewer

Posts: 12436
Location: New York
Joined: June 5, 2002
Lots.

 

I listened again earlier tonight to the Prokofiev 3rd, first movement, posted on November 14, 2020 at 01:22:03
Posts: 26437
Location: SF Bay Area
Joined: February 17, 2004
Contributor
  Since:
February 6, 2012
Dang - that recording still seems really muted on the top to me (at least compared to most other recordings). Maybe I just need to pump up the volume.

 

RE: "plywood walls" , posted on November 14, 2020 at 20:07:30
Todd Krieger
Audiophile

Posts: 37333
Location: SW United States
Joined: November 2, 2000
I need to visit the renovated Hall someday...... It generally had good reviews, but people I know are sort of "split" over which they preferred....... People tell me the sound in the hall is generally better, but more "seat location dependent" than the "Szell Shell" version.

 

RE: "plywood walls" , posted on November 15, 2020 at 05:16:04
pbarach
Audiophile

Posts: 3306
Location: Ohio
Joined: June 22, 2008
The bad seats in Severance are on the main floor under the overhanging balcony. The best sound (IMO) is in the first few rows of the balcony, which were also the best seats prior to the renovation.

 

(1) Money, plain and simple; (2) Work Rules, posted on November 15, 2020 at 08:13:37
John Marks
Manufacturer

Posts: 7799
Location: Peoples' Democratic Republic of R.I.
Joined: April 23, 2000
Not to bring a firestorm down upon my head, but, the primary reason there are so few recordings by American orchestras is that the projects cost far too much compared to the expected short-term revenue from sales of classical recordings.

Now, I cheerfully admit that it has been ages since I looked at a major-orchestra contract, but, on the other hand, I would be surprised if work rules had changed much.

I completely understand that the work rules were enacted to ensure the high quality of the final product, and to keep hard-working musicians from being exploited. But, as far as I understand it, a session lasts for three hours. After 20 minutes of (recorded) playing, there has to be a 10-minute break. Then there's 20 more minutes of recording, then another 10-minute break.

HOWEVER, the producer has to choose which 20 minutes he or she wants to use. If the producer wants to use all 40 minutes, that hour gets paid for twice.

I was once offered $30,000 to "help" with the expenses of recording Mahler 4 with an American orchestra. There was no way I could get that math to work. And the fact that they had traveled so far down the indy-label "food chain" to dangle that in front of me showed me that the larger and more experienced and I am sure better-funded indy labels had also been tempted but, mirabile dictu, sanity had prevailed, and prevailed generally!

Please do not misunderstand--my favorite Scripture verse is Matthew 10:10. The laborers are worth their hire. The BSO Charles Munch La Mer is still selling, more than 60 years later. But for every recording like that, there are literally thousands that never broke even.

I did not want to dig my own little hole even deeper by throwing my $50,000 into the pot, spending $80,000 total (back then it cost more than $2 in advertising and promotion to sell each CD, which I got paid $7 for, but from which I had to amortize startup costs and pay royalties), and take in (GROSS) perhaps $9,800 in the first year. (A big shot at Harmonia Mundi USA told me that their "average" new release sold 1,400 copies in its first year. But even if I had sold 4,000 copies in the first year, that's only $28,000 gross, so I would have lost more than $30,000 for the privilege of releasing yet another Mahler 4.)

For another project, I discussed with the AFoM putting out a live recording of Mahler by a pick-up orchestra (which had included academics, visiting foreigners, and talented amateurs), and the AFoM told me that the presence of one union member on that stage meant that all players on the stage had to be paid union scale.

I know, there is a "small issue" loophole, but that is merely a legal guarantee that you will never make money, so you need 100% "Angel Money" up front. Plus some payment for all your own work.

The sad irony is that what eventually happened to that second Mahler project is that they kept the live US master tapes on the shelf, and re-recorded the repertory with a radio orchestra in Poland, for....

$10,000 all-in, including the conductor.

Which is, in microcosm, why there are so many new releases by orchestras you might not have heard of, and so few by US orchestras you have.

BTW, there used to be two semi-well-known US orchestras that were not Unionized, but I do not know if that is still the case.

Sorry for the length.

jm

 

Lots of good nuggets of info in that post!, posted on November 15, 2020 at 11:02:44
Posts: 26437
Location: SF Bay Area
Joined: February 17, 2004
Contributor
  Since:
February 6, 2012
I had no idea that there were a couple of well known US orchestras which were not unionized - that's certainly tantalizing info! ;-)

 

I might be wrong, but..., posted on November 15, 2020 at 11:47:21
John Marks
Manufacturer

Posts: 7799
Location: Peoples' Democratic Republic of R.I.
Joined: April 23, 2000
IIRC, at least back in the day, Seattle and Nashville.

jm

 

RE: "plywood walls" , posted on November 16, 2020 at 07:57:10
Todd Krieger
Audiophile

Posts: 37333
Location: SW United States
Joined: November 2, 2000
Whenever I sat higher up in the balcony at Severance Hall (most concerts I attended were up there), I often focused on seats that were unoccupied during the concert prior to intermission. (Especially if there were multiple pieces prior to intermission, in which late patrons assume their seats between pieces.) I then moved down for the rest of the concert. Rarely had an "incident" where I ended up taking someone's seat.

Whenever I moved down, I often pretended to be listening to the "world's best stereo system".......... The lower balcony was indeed the best location to listen to a concert at Severance Hall. (I still remember how John Mack would "crow" his oboe reed as the musicians prepared prior to the concert and during intermission. And clarinetist Franklin Cohen playing the "Mahler One cuckoo" in which he once mis-timed during a performance.)

 

Page processed in 0.031 seconds.