Cable Asylum

Interconnects, speaker wire, power cords. Ask the Cable Guys.

Return to Cable Asylum


Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded

REVIEW: Wire World Ultraviolet 7 HDMI Cable

72.239.126.152

Posted on March 16, 2014 at 05:39:13
DexysMidnightRunner
Audiophile

Posts: 162
Location: Florida
Joined: January 5, 2001
Model: Ultraviolet 7 HDMI
Category: Cable
Suggested Retail Price: $120 - 145
Description: 1 and 2-meter video cables
Manufacturer URL: Wire World
Model Picture: View

Review by DexysMidnightRunner on March 16, 2014 at 05:39:13
IP Address: 72.239.126.152
Add Your Review
for the Ultraviolet 7 HDMI


Like many home theater enthusiasts, I was skeptical about the ability of HDMI cables to improve (or degrade) video and audio quality - per the conventional theory, the signals are digital, and the cables either work - presumably perfectly - or don't, so there's supposedly nothing to gain by trying better cables. While this may be the boilerplate theory, in practice it's untrue. Case in point, the Wireworld Ultraviolet HDMI cable under review here.

Initial positive impressions: The video quality improved exponentially in virtually every aspect as compared to the well-regarded cables they replaced - the much-recommended and largely praised Monoprice HDMIs, in a variety of lengths and gauges. Films were simply more film-like, with depth and dimensionality that had been absent with the Monoprice cables. My Pioneer plasma is not 3-D, but the sense of three-dimensionality was impressive...and no wonky 3-D glasses to have to wear! Detail and sharpness increased radically, bringing textures to life...the fabrics of clothing, skin textures, all the variations of life. Film is capable of tremendous resolution and detail; it appears that, theory be damned, lesser cables are not delivering all the quality that's potentially in the source. Mind, this is with the sharpness control of the Pioneer plasma properly set to near its lowest setting, to avoid the false detail and ringing common with the factory-delivered settings.

Colors became both richer and solider with the Ultraviolets, rendering many more subtle shades and hues more visible and realistic. Blacks, especially, were improved, noticeably deeper and less noisy; black level is one of the key factors in great video presentation, better blacks (that don't hide low-level details in the murk) giving a much more realistic picture. Black-and-white films could look spectacular, whether I was viewing classics such as "The Third Man" and "Casablanca" or modern, soon-to-be classics like "Schindler's List," which was a knockout film with the Ultraviolets in place. I should note, as this is a review of both the 1-meter and 2-meter lengths, I'm currently using two 2-meter Ultraviolet cable runs: one between a Dish satellite receiver and my AVR, and another connecting the AVR to my plasma display, while a 1-meter length connects a Pioneer Blu-ray BDP-62FD player to the AVR. As soon as I saw the improvement on Blu-ray, I called my Wireworld dealer [Liquid HiFi, an authorized dealer who offers great prices and service; email for Liquid HiFi: ronaldbuffington@msn.com], to order another 2m length for my satellite receiver. While the satellite reception is generally good, any improvement in quality is warmly appreciated...and the Ultraviolet delivers in spades, whether it's used with Blu-ray, DVD, or satellite.

If I say less about the audio performance, it's because the jump in audio performance with my video sources, while noticeable, seemed in my system of a lesser magnitude than the dramatic increase in video performance. Audio presentation was clearer, with less grit and smear in the sound, more detailed without introducing spitty high-frequency tizz. Voices in particular were more resolved, allowing me to more clearly parse dialogue. I haven't yet played any purely music media through my video system, so I can't comment on the sound rendered by SACD, DVD-A, or even ordinary CDs; I'll update this review with more detailed sonic impressions once I listen critically to sources other than films and television through my video system (which is completely separate from my main audio system; unfortunately, I cannot use an HDMI connection with my audio system, which only has analogue inputs).

Over the last couple of weeks my initial positive impressions were confirmed on a daily basis; there were no notable changes in performance during the first hundred hours of use, so break-in might not be a significant issue with the Ultraviolets.

As for the one negative comment I could make: These cables have a flat profile and are rather stiff horizontally, so if your equipment sits side-by-side, as does some of mine, rather than vertically in a rack, they're a bit less maneuverable in handling acute bends than typical round-profile cables, and a longer length might be required so bends can be made more gradually. At first I tried a 1m cable between my satellite receiver and AVR; it just reached, but I could see that lateral stress was being applied to the female HDMI chassis connectors. Fragile as these POS connectors are (didn't engineers learn ANYTHING about designing a secure and robust connector in the last hundred years?), I did not want to risk breaking the chassis connectors and putting the system out-of-order, so I opted for a 2m length, which obviated the problem. And that's it so far for downsides.

As you probably have noticed by now, I am very happy with these cables. They're really well built, with high-quality construction and materials, and very reasonably priced cables delivering great performance...and yet they're only mid-way along the Wireworld line of HDMI cables. While I may well get even better performance with Wireworld cables further up the price and performance line, I'm content for now to enjoy the higher-quality video I gained in my system with the Ultraviolets.


Product Weakness: Lateral stiffness
Product Strengths: Resolution, Detail, Build quality


Associated Equipment for this Review:

Amplifier: Yamaha AVR
Preamplifier (or None if Integrated): N/A
Sources (CDP/Turntable): Pioneer Elite BDP-62FD Blu-ray; Dish satellite receiver
Speakers: Sound Dynamics 300Ti, Von Schweikert center channel
Cables/Interconnects: Wireworld Ultraviolet 7 HDMI, Goertz M1 speaker cables, MIT power cords
Music Used (Genre/Selections): None
Time Period/Length of Audition: 2 weeks
Other (Power Conditioner etc.): MIT Iso-Strip
Type of Audition/Review: Product Owner



-----

If you haven't heard it, you don't have an opinion.

 

Hide full thread outline!
    ...
RE: REVIEW: Wire World Ultraviolet 7 HDMI Cable, posted on March 16, 2014 at 06:49:56
mcbuddah
Audiophile

Posts: 384
Location: Wisconsin
Joined: June 8, 2012
Hats off for a thorough review of what is apparently an excellent HDMI cable. Were I still in the market for my HT system cables, I would certainly try them out. As it is, my HT system rewiring project ended a year ago after auditioning too many HDMI cables that exaggerated some aspects of video reproduction at the expense of others or did little at all to improve things when compared to cheap ones. The best that I found included the outrageously expensive PS-Audio I2S all-silver HDMI they developed for their 10K+ transport/DAC package. I was lucky enough to pick up a couple of them at steep discounts when they were discontinued, but I could not find enough for everything I wanted to do. Eventually, I tried the new Mapleshade vividlink HDMI ($168/2 meter), and was truly blown away at how much improvement I got, even better than the I2S cables.

If you are still looking for another major improvement to your video reproduction, I strongly suggest putting each of your HT components on maple platforms, supported by iso-blocks. I put 20x15x 3 1/2 platforms under my OPPO and Pioneer AVR, but the biggest improvement for video came when I put a 12" square x 3" block, iso-blocks, and brass cones under the POS DishNetwork set-top box! I bought all three blocks from dawnsplatforms for under $250 shipped, and they really put my system over the top.
Everything is going to the dogs

 

Excellent report - and quite a surprise, posted on March 16, 2014 at 08:31:03
Metralla
Audiophile

Posts: 7801
Location: San Jose, California
Joined: January 30, 2001
I expected you to say that video improved only slightly, but to read: "The video quality improved exponentially in virtually every aspect as compared to the well-regarded cables they replaced - the much-recommended and largely praised Monoprice HDMIs, in a variety of lengths and gauges" was quite surprising.

Good job.


Regards,
Geoff

 

RE: Excellent report - and quite a surprise, posted on March 16, 2014 at 13:41:28
DexysMidnightRunner
Audiophile

Posts: 162
Location: Florida
Joined: January 5, 2001
Thanks, Geoff - I was quite surprised myself at the results. I'd read review after review where, if any changes were perceived at all, it was the audio that evidenced the greatest change, so I wondered if that was likely to be my experience as well. Having absorbed so many "WE have SCIENCE on our side!" articles and reviews that uniformly denied the very possibility of alteration to the signal, I also wondered if in fact the near-perfect signal conductor had really been developed. When what I saw and heard went against the stream, all I could do was climb out on the limb and report my experience. The SCIENCE! guys who quote theory as fact are, IME, just wrong. I suppose they completely forgot the whole "Perfect Sound Forever" disaster of the last thirty years.
-----

If you haven't heard it, you don't have an opinion.

 

RE: REVIEW: Wire World Ultraviolet 7 HDMI Cable, posted on March 16, 2014 at 14:17:56
DexysMidnightRunner
Audiophile

Posts: 162
Location: Florida
Joined: January 5, 2001
Thanks! If I could get, say, a 98% discount on the PS cables :-) I might try them...as it is, I'm glad you also mention the real-world sub-$200 Mapleshade cables, certainly something I would put on my shopping list as within reach of mere mortals like me. I'd nominate the Wireworld Ultraviolet 1m as a must-try candidate in the 2-digit(!) price category - Liquid HiFi, an authorized Wireworld dealer, can deliver these cables at a very nice price, with the 2m lengths just into the 3-digit category. So many cables, so little time...so I'm really glad you took the time to write of your experiences with many cables, as it seems the Mapleshade Vividlink HDMIs deserve much more attention.
-----

If you haven't heard it, you don't have an opinion.

 

RE: REVIEW: Wire World Ultraviolet 7 HDMI Cable, posted on March 16, 2014 at 15:13:43
fantja
Audiophile

Posts: 15519
Location: Alabama
Joined: September 11, 2010
As always, another outstanding review!
I use a WW Silver Starlight 5.2 w/ outstanding results.
I can only imagine how the Platinum sounds/looks.
Wireworld, IMO, builds the very best HDMI.

 

RE: REVIEW: Wire World Ultraviolet 7 HDMI Cable, posted on March 16, 2014 at 19:36:40
Marc Almirall
Audiophile

Posts: 292
Location: San Diego, Ca.
Joined: August 3, 2009
Nice to read this well written and thorough review of these excellent cables.

In November of last year I treated myself to a new plasma TV(Panny 50ST60) after hearing about Panasonics exit from the pdp arena. I've been extremely happy with it, but had itched to try and wring out every last ounce of performance from it, including replacing the power cord and getting an ISF calibration. Originally I had been using a 1m Perfect Path HDMI between the Blu-Ray player and the TV. It was primarily the locking HDMI's and the price that sold me on the Perfect Paths. I still consider them very decent cables(and use that one between my cable box and television now), but replacing it with a 2m Ultraviolet 7 did bring things up a couple notches in the picture quality area. I admit that at first I didn't pick up on the improvements wrought by this cable, and after a week or so I wondered if things weren't in fact better with the previous one I'd been using, so I put the Perfect Path back between bdp and the television and thats when I really noticed the changes. Like you noted in your review the biggest difference for me was that the picture gained more depth and more "pop" in 2D with a greater ability in revealing subtle textures and gradations of color, especially in skin tones. Black levels and contrast definitely took a jump too. Overall I've been really pleased with the UV7 and at the $40 price I paid for mine(with an old credit at The Cable Co.) could not be more pleased. Even at full retail I'd do it again.

Like you I also went with the longer length for the reason you noted in your review. With my TV, the HDMI's are mounted on the side which I thought would put undue strain on the fragile connections. The longer length helped make the bend more gracefully and alleviated the strain on the jacks.

 

RE: REVIEW: Wire World Ultraviolet 7 HDMI Cable, posted on March 16, 2014 at 22:35:43
DexysMidnightRunner
Audiophile

Posts: 162
Location: Florida
Joined: January 5, 2001
Marc, you make a great point in suggesting that one way to confirm (or disprove) impressions of cable performance is to leave the newer cable in for a week or so, then replace it with the older cable. It's shocking how clearly the differences can be seen, if there are any. I did that after using the Wireworlds for a week, using two older HDMI cables, the Monoprices which had been my mainstays, as well as an Audioquest Forest, a cable I tried before the Ultraviolets arrived. To my eyes and ears, I detected no real differences between the Monoprices and the Forest, so I considered them essentially equals. The Ultraviolets were head and shoulders above both of my previous cables, and it took but minutes to confirm the reality of the positive changes wrought.

A friend had much the same experience with his new Ultraviolets; at about the same time as I bought my first two, he bought one to use between an Oppo 105 and his new 65" Panny. He called me a few hours later on the same day he received his cable and said he was going to get a second WW for his satellite TV source, so impressed was he with the performance of the Ultraviolet with Blu-ray. Raved about the black levels and color, saying none of his reference discs had ever looked so good. Putting his older cable back in showed how comparatively degraded were the sound and video with the old cable. Perhaps the old saw is true - we don't always see the faults of the old and familiar until it's compared with its superior.
-----

If you haven't heard it, you don't have an opinion.

 

RE: REVIEW: Wire World Ultraviolet 7 HDMI Cable, posted on March 16, 2014 at 22:48:34
DexysMidnightRunner
Audiophile

Posts: 162
Location: Florida
Joined: January 5, 2001
I can only imagine how the Platinum sounds/looks.

You took that thought straight from inside my brain - I'm actively resisting the urge to spend $1000 for a single Platinum cable! Mcbuddah mentioned in this thread that the Mapleshade Vividlink is a top-of-the-heap contender, and since it's a sub-$200 cable, that's much more likely to wind up on my next shopping list.
-----

If you haven't heard it, you don't have an opinion.

 

RE: REVIEW: Wire World Ultraviolet 7 HDMI Cable, posted on March 17, 2014 at 10:25:15
fantja
Audiophile

Posts: 15519
Location: Alabama
Joined: September 11, 2010
The Platinum will really shine if you own a plasma tv.
Keep me posted on your purchase.

 

RE: REVIEW: Wire World Ultraviolet 7 HDMI Cable, posted on August 20, 2014 at 06:22:05
agisthos
Audiophile

Posts: 15
Joined: September 14, 2011
I can understand why most people who do an actual trial think there is no difference between HDMI cables for video quality.

When I first got my high end Sony backlit LED TV, ISF calibrated and so on, I purchased a series of expensive HDMI cables from Nordost, QED, Chord Company and others, and I really could barely tell a difference between them on video quality.

It was only until I purchased a Mapleshade Vivlink Plus HDMI that I first experienced a video quality improvement, and noticeably. But the Vivlink is a fragile construction bordering on the ridiculous (like all of Mapleshades products), and very susceptible to noise related issues from whatever it touches.

So I have always wondered how the latest Wireworld Platinum Starlight compares. Its good to hear reports of Video improvement from the Ultraviolet, a very affordable cable indeed relative to speciality cables.

 

RE: REVIEW: Wire World Ultraviolet 7 HDMI Cable, posted on August 20, 2014 at 19:19:50
fantja
Audiophile

Posts: 15519
Location: Alabama
Joined: September 11, 2010
I use the WireWorld Silver Starlight 5.2 HDMI. Killer performance, only bettered by, the Platinum version. It will not matter if the cable is current platinum or not, it is still a platinum version HDMI.

 

Mapleshade "Plus" HDMI Cable is a well kept secret..., posted on August 25, 2014 at 07:57:51
This HDMI cable REALLY does improve the picture...let's keep it top secret !!

Let's let people on these forums keep on saying that.. "all HDMI cables are the same"...HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA ....

 

RE: Mapleshade "Plus" HDMI Cable is a well kept secret..., posted on August 25, 2014 at 08:27:59
fantja
Audiophile

Posts: 15519
Location: Alabama
Joined: September 11, 2010
Right On!

 

RE: REVIEW: Wire World Ultraviolet 7 HDMI Cable, posted on August 27, 2014 at 13:31:20
agisthos
Audiophile

Posts: 15
Joined: September 14, 2011
Okay I will have a Silver Starlight 7 series coming soon. Going head to head with the Vivlink Plus !!

If it matches or exceeds it I will be pleased, and then go for the Platinum Starlight. But to drop over 1k on the Platinum is too much risk.

 

Page processed in 0.027 seconds.