Amp/Preamp Asylum

Looking for a new Amp or Preamp? If you're after tubes, post over here.

Return to Amp/Preamp Asylum


Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded

TKD based finished passive preamp

70.26.56.155

Posted on April 17, 2016 at 08:45:38
BRab
Audiophile

Posts: 962
Joined: January 28, 2002
Does anyone know of a finished passive based on a TKD pot?

 

Hide full thread outline!
    ...
RE: TKD based finished passive preamp, posted on April 17, 2016 at 13:50:11
Frihed89
Audiophile

Posts: 15703
Location: Copenhagen
Joined: March 21, 2005
Do they even make ladder attenuators?

 

Is this the preamp you are talking about, posted on April 18, 2016 at 08:39:20
airtime
Audiophile

Posts: 11287
Location: Arizona
Joined: February 4, 2003
.

 

RE: Is this the preamp you are talking about, posted on April 18, 2016 at 18:17:40
Blackdog
Manufacturer

Posts: 1505
Location: Ontario
Joined: March 20, 2006
Those are not TKD. They're made in Poland by Khozmo. Darn fine passive attenuators. 48 stepped attenuators, very well made. They will outperform a TKD easily.


Dan Santoni

 

RE: Is this the preamp you are talking about, posted on April 20, 2016 at 06:34:10
BRab
Audiophile

Posts: 962
Joined: January 28, 2002
You're right. These are not TKD; however, I'm not so sure that they would outperform the TKD unless you've made a direct comparison. The reason I'm afer a TKD passive is that the TKD has outperformed anything else I've tried, the last being a pair of Slagle autoformers widely considered to be the last word in transparent attenuation.

 

Curious, please elaborate about TKG vs. Slagle., posted on April 20, 2016 at 06:47:36
I've read good things about both. What do you feel the TKD does better? Thanks.

 

Very interesting. Thanks Nt, posted on April 20, 2016 at 08:09:35
Frihed89
Audiophile

Posts: 15703
Location: Copenhagen
Joined: March 21, 2005
Nt

 

RE: Curious, please elaborate about TKG vs. Slagle., posted on April 20, 2016 at 12:37:41
BRab
Audiophile

Posts: 962
Joined: January 28, 2002
I had the Slagles in a passive that had a selector switch that became noisy. I replaced the passive with an old TKD volume pot I had previously used and was very surprised with the improvement in detail, frequency extension and dynamic contrast. I still think the Slagles are very good and the improvement may be down to a lucky match of the TKD with my sources and amplifier with respect to impedances etc, but I do think the alleged superiority of stepped attenuators, autoformers and all the rest of the miracle attenuators is really overstated and the sq of a good traditional volume pot can be quite extraordinary.

 

RE: TKD based finished passive preamp, posted on April 23, 2016 at 13:41:08
TGT
Audiophile

Posts: 531
Location: Kentucky
Joined: December 6, 2002
By the way, Bascom H. King talks about his preference for a passive preamp in the section on PS audio's new preamp.

 

Thanks. nt, posted on April 24, 2016 at 20:11:40
nt

 

RE: TKD based finished passive preamp, posted on April 25, 2016 at 11:27:43
TubeDriver
Audiophile

Posts: 794
Location: East Coast
Joined: February 16, 2007
You can get TKD stereo 100k pot for $100 at Parts Connection or other DIY stores. Pretty easy to build it up or just take it to your local guitar center and pay them to put it in a box, add a switch (for 2-3 sources) and install some RCAs on the back.

 

RE: Curious, please elaborate about TKG vs. Slagle., posted on April 26, 2016 at 09:50:24
mitch2
Audiophile

Posts: 1521
Location: Great Lakes
Joined: August 28, 2001
You are comparing a transformer (autoformer) volume attenuator to a resistor-based volume attenuator. Sort of apples to oranges except that they both attenuate volume. I believe TKD made both resistor-based attenuators as well as potentiometers, which are a different device and generally thought to be inferior sonically to a discrete resistor based control. Do you know whether yours is a potentiometer or resistor based control?

For the resistor volume attenuator, the switch itself, whether TKD, Khozmo or other types is basically a means to make contact with discrete resistors. The biggest sonic difference will be the type of resistors used. The other thing that may have a smaller effect on the sound is the quality of construction and materials used in the contacts (e.g., silver or gold plating over a base metal). Otherwise, what makes one attenuator better than another are the ergonomics (how it feels when used) and durability.

My preamp has a Shallco switch with Audio Note Tantalum Resistors and sonically it beats both Goldpoint and Endler switches I also have here, although the comparison is not fair since the Shallco is part of a no-gain buffered preamp and the others are simply volume attenuators. I owned a Tom Evans Vibe that used a DACT attenuator (which uses SMDs same as the Goldpoint) and that preamp sounded outstanding, although not as good as my current preamp. The easiest thing might be to try a Goldpoint attenuator or find somewhere to buy the TKD attenuator, not the potentiometer.

Below is a link to a site showing many types of volume controls.

 

Page processed in 0.023 seconds.