Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded
I've read many times that 6SN7's are "big tone" tubes, but........
71.187.40.191 |
||
Posted on October 29, 2014 at 10:03:56 | ||
there don't seem to be that many 6SN7 preamps, while many employ 12AX7's and 12AU7's. Why? Is it harder to come up with a good circuit for 6SN7's, more expensive to design/implement? Less good 6SN7's available than 12AX(AU)7's? AFAIK there are hardly any phono sections that use 6SN7's. How come? IIRC the only 6SN7 pre I've heard was a Cary SLP 98. It sounded pretty good to me, but not radically better or much more "big toned" than 12AX(AU)7 based pre's I've heard. I only heard the Cary for a short time at a show, so my impressions of it are not based on long term auditioning. So what's the deal? Do 6SN7's really inherently provide more fleshed out timbre than 12's? |
I'm gonna check that one out. Dealer not far away has 'em. nt, posted on October 29, 2014 at 20:42:04 | |
nt |
Thanks for all the replies, guys. A 6SN7 preamp is in my future. nt, posted on October 29, 2014 at 21:00:18 | |
nt |
RE: Thanks for all the replies, guys. A 6SN7 preamp is in my future. nt, posted on October 29, 2014 at 23:26:59 | |
Posts: 15703
Location: Copenhagen Joined: March 21, 2005 |
DeHavilland Ultraverve 3. |