|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
24.4.255.236
In Reply to: MAD parts posted by djk on February 4, 2007 at 15:13:30:
..cap be in parallel with the 3.3 and not the 200?
Follow Ups:
No, the $.30 mylar is for the 200uF electrolytic.
No need for sarcasm, really. I didn't ask, but was offered, the cheapest route. :-) That's okay, though, as if this doesn't work out well, I won't be out much if I decide to go with higher grade components later - which might also mean upgrading the drivers - which will mean the speakers will only be the ESS in case only.Let me ask this, then. Would it makes sense to run a "better, smaller" cap in parallel with the 3.3 cap, as well as the 200uF cap, to bolster both, as it were?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: