|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
99.111.118.190
In Reply to: RE: LOL posted by drlowmu on October 12, 2016 at 09:43:10
A designer should always ? there work doubt there design make it prove that its right. If a designer feels they are the worlds best they most certainly are not.
Follow Ups:
The folks who claim to have the answers usually have none.
When you see a bunch of pseudo-technical terms applied to justify their results...followed by an attack on those who exercise an Engineering analysis ought to be enough reason to ignore.
That this sort of behavior is well documented, it looks more like some sort of willful ignorance or just outright nastiness to keep pushing it.
I just love laughing at the claims. So utterly ridiculous...like a 2A3 amp with just the right wiring and a driver stage designed to start rolling off in the early 5 digit CPS domain able to deliver power 1-2 orders of magnitude higher than its actual capability. OMG...and the response when asked is to suggest traveling some hundreds of miles to hear one for myself????
Are you out ov yer Vulcan mind, Spock?
cheers,
Douglas
Friend, I would not hurt thee for the world...but thou art standing where I am about to shoot.
And a speaker designer should always question there (sic) spelling. However, I agree with you 100%.
There's fixed bias, cathode self bias, grid leak bias and confirmation bias.
Jeff's amps mostly use the latter.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: