|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
98.84.71.61
I'm not the world's most zealous Led Zeppelin fan. Quite honestly, they lost me after II. But I'm always encouraged when a member of a band as large and influential as Led Zeppelin is concerned about the sound quality of their catalog. Here's one more story on the subject.
Follow Ups:
.
Those (2) boxed sets from the early 1990's is not bad sound at all.
W/ all of the booze & drugs back in those days, it is a wonder the fans got anything at all from the super-groups of the 70's?
I like the Led Zeppelin reissues and I'm buying them for the new content not the remastering.
I find the whole remastering and high resolution thing kind of funny. Jimmy Page sounds like more of an idiot than Neil Young. The industry is all about making money (nothing wrong with that) but I've no need to question the sincerity of the musicians (they can be duped as easy as the rest of us). Remastering always raises a red flag with me but expanded content is almost always a good thing.
Give me rhythm or give me death!
I see your point.
I succumbed to temptation though, with the Beatles mono LPs. There was such overwhelming praise for the remastering over on the Vinyl Asylum (and elsewhere) that I had to hear it for myself.
I bought the box set, but so far have only listened to Sgt. Pepper's. The main difference I noticed with that remastering was how the bass and drums stood out more than with the original.
Hey, wait a minute. I'm not normally a conspiracy theorist, but there's two Beatles left alive, the bassist and the drummer. And what instruments stand out in the remastering? Hmmm.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: