|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
24.8.210.206
In Reply to: RE: Glocks do not use clips. They use magazines. posted by Victor Khomenko on January 12, 2011 at 11:21:02
If you can't shoot and kill a home intruder with 15 rounds, you might as well give it up.
---------------------------
Normal people scare me
Follow Ups:
But more importantly - if 10 was the limit, you would be still asking the same question, why ten and not three... so why pretend? One has to make the decision at some point, and today the extended mags are allowed in most states. If you have data showing their negative effect on crime statistics, I am sure there is someone who would be willing to hear the argument.
Otherwise, this makes no difference. For besides the number of rounds there are also other things like the caliber choices (Why, Oh, Why, would anyone need anything over .32ACP?), bullet design, barrel length, action type, etc, etc, etc.
These aberrant crimes do not prove there is a systemic problem with magazine capacity.
Using liberal logic....
If the average bus wreck kills 14 people, why are busses allowed that carry so many passengers?
If the average airliner crash kills 120 people, why do we allow anything other than single flier planes?
The use of a high capacity magazine does not prove the risk these devices being legal. Can you list other relvent examples?
Just as the nut was not a 'representative liberal' or 'representative conservative,' he is also not representative of gun owners.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: